Quite a few poor decisions that would've been overturned.
The absurdity of it all is that the umpire can call for a replay to check for No-Balls but the players cant call for a replay for Blatantly wrong LBW decisions.

by jackpot jim » Tue Oct 05, 2010 6:49 pm
by cripple » Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:06 pm
jackpot jim wrote:This Test is a perfect example of why the Decision Review System needs to be used for ALL Test matches.
Quite a few poor decisions that would've been overturned.
The absurdity of it all is that the umpire can call for a replay to check for No-Balls but the players cant call for a replay for Blatantly wrong LBW decisions.
by Media Park » Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:11 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by jackpot jim » Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:36 pm
cripple wrote:jackpot jim wrote:This Test is a perfect example of why the Decision Review System needs to be used for ALL Test matches.
Quite a few poor decisions that would've been overturned.
The absurdity of it all is that the umpire can call for a replay to check for No-Balls but the players cant call for a replay for Blatantly wrong LBW decisions.
But from what i have read here all the mistakes evened themselves out in the end, so there really isn't any major issue with one team or the other being to harshly dealt with.
by NFC » Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:54 pm
by smithy » Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:56 pm
NFC wrote:Standard of umpiring was a complete joke this test match. Complete and utter joke.
by Jim05 » Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:04 pm
by Media Park » Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:09 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Jim05 » Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:46 pm
by tiger07andbeyond » Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:16 pm
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.
by brod » Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:43 pm
by Jim05 » Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:25 pm
by smithy » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:02 am
by jackpot jim » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:23 am
Jim05 wrote:I hope we lose the series 3 zip it may be the only way the selectors see how **** we are and make some changes. Huss,north and hauritz thanks but see you later. Bring in hughes,fergie and smith. This would have been the perfect series to try something. Laxman always kills us but sharma is a muppet and he faced enough balls for us to get him out. Some of pontings moves very strange but im worried what happens when he pulls pin,dont think clarkey is up to it just yet. Maybe haddin next in line very good brain and has captained nsw.
by Gozu » Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:54 am
smithy wrote:Micheal Clarke should've been given the ball ahead of North and Hauritz for starters.
When are you lot gonna turn to the dark side and realise what I was saying months ago.
Hauritz is NOT A TEST BOWLER.
Give the young lad Smith a chance.
He can't do any worse, is a MUCH better fielder and batsman.
George would have to be a good chance to make his debut too given Bollingers injury.
by wristwatcher » Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:08 am
by smithy » Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:12 am
by wristwatcher » Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:23 am
smithy wrote:You'll turn to the dark side soon enough Gozu.
Hauritz is crap and is only in the side cause he moved south.
North has the same amount of 1st class wickets and if he could bat would be an allrounder.
get Smith in NOW, can;t do any worse.
Who are the current ACB selectors by the way?
Is there a decent cricket brain amongst them ?
by Jim05 » Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:42 am
by Jim05 » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:18 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |