by mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Sep 23, 2010 8:43 pm
by auto » Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:10 pm
by auto » Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:11 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:it is an absolute scam sham bullshit
by mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:11 pm
by White Line Fever » Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:16 pm
by auto » Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:25 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:history
the best way to predict the future is to relate back to the past
by JAS » Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:27 pm
by Q. » Thu Sep 23, 2010 10:02 pm
by fish » Thu Sep 23, 2010 10:33 pm
White Line Fever wrote:I'm no scientist but we just had our coldest and wettest winter in 20 years in the driest state in the driest country in the world.
Based on that I think some humans believe they are bigger than god (not that i believe in that) and can't accept that weather changes!
Big deal worry more about todays issues.
by Barto » Thu Sep 23, 2010 10:35 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:it is an absolute scam sham bullshit
by Barto » Thu Sep 23, 2010 10:36 pm
fish wrote:White Line Fever wrote:I'm no scientist but we just had our coldest and wettest winter in 20 years in the driest state in the driest country in the world.
Based on that I think some humans believe they are bigger than god (not that i believe in that) and can't accept that weather changes!
Big deal worry more about todays issues.
The planet has just had it's hottest decade on record which sort of makes a coldish winter pale in comparison.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Fri Sep 24, 2010 12:24 am
by FlyingHigh » Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:57 am
by Psyber » Fri Sep 24, 2010 11:45 am
by Psyber » Fri Sep 24, 2010 11:59 am
"Monetary gain": Research grants.Barto wrote:So what monetary gain to the scientists have to gain from this 'scam'.mighty_tiger_79 wrote:it is an absolute scam sham bullshit
There's no doubt in my mind that continual pollution from fossil fuels consumed by an ever increasing population must have some deleterious effect on the environment.
by FlyingHigh » Fri Sep 24, 2010 12:17 pm
Psyber wrote:I had to vote "don't believe" on the assumption the poll meant that human activity was the major cause.
I would have supported the view that it is possibly a contributing factor.
FlyingHigh's statistic from Catalyst [not exactly a primary data source] may be correct about the overall rise only being 2 degrees in 125,000 years.
However:
1. 125,000 years is a small sample of the billions of years involved.
2. It doesn't exclude large fluctuations during that period of 125,000 years.
[Like the vineyards in Yorkshire in 200AD, and Greenland being green, not white, from about 900AD to about 1100 AD. It is not warm enough for those to happen now.]
by stretch » Fri Sep 24, 2010 12:33 pm
by fish » Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:05 pm
Psyber wrote:"Monetary gain": Research grants.Barto wrote:So what monetary gain to the scientists have to gain from this 'scam'.mighty_tiger_79 wrote:it is an absolute scam sham bullshit
There's no doubt in my mind that continual pollution from fossil fuels consumed by an ever increasing population must have some deleterious effect on the environment.
by Gingernuts » Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:05 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |