by Footy_Rulz » Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:17 pm
by Choccies » Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:22 pm
teaoby wrote:Footy_Rulz wrote:Well then the rule is a joke...and that is a massive loophole
well if your A's had done the right thing and won last week u'd be fine too![]()
sorry couldn't help myself. but in all seriousness. we're not trying to mess with the system these blokes have legitimatly come back from injury and need a game. we're just lucky enough to have everyone else already in a GF
by Footy_Rulz » Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:23 pm
by TEX07 » Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:34 pm
Choccies wrote:teaoby wrote:Footy_Rulz wrote:Well then the rule is a joke...and that is a massive loophole
well if your A's had done the right thing and won last week u'd be fine too![]()
sorry couldn't help myself. but in all seriousness. we're not trying to mess with the system these blokes have legitimatly come back from injury and need a game. we're just lucky enough to have everyone else already in a GF
So do we but we aren't blatantly cheating like that !! Waltham has played 12 A grade games so to prepare for his A grade finals he 'needs' to play a D grade game ?? Get yer hand off it.... Thats a crap rule and I dont care what piss weak crap Executive Member comes out with but thats a joke and if he is on the committee that approves those permits he should hang his boots up. Disgrace.
by Q. » Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:42 pm
by Choccies » Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:46 pm
by Executive Member » Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:56 pm
Choccies wrote:teaoby wrote:Footy_Rulz wrote:Well then the rule is a joke...and that is a massive loophole
well if your A's had done the right thing and won last week u'd be fine too![]()
sorry couldn't help myself. but in all seriousness. we're not trying to mess with the system these blokes have legitimatly come back from injury and need a game. we're just lucky enough to have everyone else already in a GF
So do we but we aren't blatantly cheating like that !! Waltham has played 12 A grade games so to prepare for his A grade finals he 'needs' to play a D grade game ?? Get yer hand off it.... Thats a crap rule and I dont care what piss weak crap Executive Member comes out with but thats a joke and if he is on the committee that approves those permits he should hang his boots up. Disgrace.
by Footy_Rulz » Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:03 pm
Executive Member wrote:Choccies wrote:teaoby wrote:Footy_Rulz wrote:Well then the rule is a joke...and that is a massive loophole
well if your A's had done the right thing and won last week u'd be fine too![]()
sorry couldn't help myself. but in all seriousness. we're not trying to mess with the system these blokes have legitimatly come back from injury and need a game. we're just lucky enough to have everyone else already in a GF
So do we but we aren't blatantly cheating like that !! Waltham has played 12 A grade games so to prepare for his A grade finals he 'needs' to play a D grade game ?? Get yer hand off it.... Thats a crap rule and I dont care what piss weak crap Executive Member comes out with but thats a joke and if he is on the committee that approves those permits he should hang his boots up. Disgrace.
Thanks for the vote of confidence there Choccies it means a lot to me![]()
Can I suggest that if you and your club are outraged by the rule then you speak to your Club Delegate who has the power to get it changed
It's not like we sat around and made the rule up all we can do is enforce it and like I said if you and your club feel that strongly about it then you have the power to change it
by TEX07 » Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:13 pm
by Trader » Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:17 pm
Footy_Rulz wrote:...and will not change the feeling that our players will feel for the rest of our lives of being cheated by the SAAFL if we lose on saturday.
by TEX07 » Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:19 pm
Trader wrote:Footy_Rulz wrote:...and will not change the feeling that our players will feel for the rest of our lives of being cheated by the SAAFL if we lose on saturday.
Rest of your lives? There isn't that much difference between 2nd and 3rd!![]()
You never know, players looking for a bit of match fitness might only serve to distract the remaining players from their normal role and do nothing other than disrupt team balance. This could help prevent you boys from going out in straight sets.
by schimma » Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:24 pm
TEX07 wrote:If I was playing for SMOSH I would be stoked with the rule, PAOC win this week they would be thinking they have the GF in the bag! Come next week PAOC will need to play their best side in all grades leaving the D grade full of just that D graders, this is why this selection for PAOC is an unfair one and one that may get them into a D grade GF, but wont win them one.
If GG had won in the A grade last week, there is no way we would play a player down in the D grade for "match time". What will they gain from this? Maybe you could get the entire B grade to play in the C4 GF this week Choccies?My point is just because it is allowed to happen does not mean it should.
by Choccies » Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:29 pm
Executive Member wrote:Choccies wrote:teaoby wrote:Footy_Rulz wrote:Well then the rule is a joke...and that is a massive loophole
well if your A's had done the right thing and won last week u'd be fine too![]()
sorry couldn't help myself. but in all seriousness. we're not trying to mess with the system these blokes have legitimatly come back from injury and need a game. we're just lucky enough to have everyone else already in a GF
So do we but we aren't blatantly cheating like that !! Waltham has played 12 A grade games so to prepare for his A grade finals he 'needs' to play a D grade game ?? Get yer hand off it.... Thats a crap rule and I dont care what piss weak crap Executive Member comes out with but thats a joke and if he is on the committee that approves those permits he should hang his boots up. Disgrace.
Thanks for the vote of confidence there Choccies it means a lot to me![]()
Can I suggest that if you and your club are outraged by the rule then you speak to your Club Delegate who has the power to get it changed
It's not like we sat around and made the rule up all we can do is enforce it and like I said if you and your club feel that strongly about it then you have the power to change it
by teaoby » Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:33 pm
schimma wrote:TEX07 wrote:If I was playing for SMOSH I would be stoked with the rule, PAOC win this week they would be thinking they have the GF in the bag! Come next week PAOC will need to play their best side in all grades leaving the D grade full of just that D graders, this is why this selection for PAOC is an unfair one and one that may get them into a D grade GF, but wont win them one.
If GG had won in the A grade last week, there is no way we would play a player down in the D grade for "match time". What will they gain from this? Maybe you could get the entire B grade to play in the C4 GF this week Choccies?My point is just because it is allowed to happen does not mean it should.
I play for Smosh (try) and we just want to play the best. I personaly am not happy with the rules but like stated not much you can do about. A grade Players playing D grade is a disgrace and like i said the blokes missing out have been robbed. Good luck to all the D graders this week.
by finn » Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:38 pm
by Choccies » Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:41 pm
by Executive Member » Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:43 pm
by bandar » Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:44 pm
by Choccies » Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:45 pm
by schimma » Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:48 pm
Executive Member wrote:Standard response as expected......![]()
Piss weak SAAFL.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |