by hottie » Thu Aug 19, 2010 7:34 pm
by Aerie » Thu Aug 19, 2010 8:50 pm
by am Bays » Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:15 pm
saintal wrote:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/handby-and-panthers-part-ways/story-fn525un5-1225907215731
"There was a bit more to it", according to Handby. A very "South-like" situation unfortunately.
Anyway, the club moves on...
Pyman. That name always opens a can of worms. Rightly or wrongly, he'd lost the players in 2007. Some of the efforts that year were a disgrace.
It will be forever debated what clubs should do in these circumstances. I was against the decision at the time. Pulled out the tape of the 2006 final v Port the other day. It could be argued that he should have gotten more out of that highly talented squad though. Hell, to have half of those names now..
Getting off topic here.
by southee » Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:17 pm
am Bays wrote:saintal wrote:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/handby-and-panthers-part-ways/story-fn525un5-1225907215731
"There was a bit more to it", according to Handby. A very "South-like" situation unfortunately.
Anyway, the club moves on...
Pyman. That name always opens a can of worms. Rightly or wrongly, he'd lost the players in 2007. Some of the efforts that year were a disgrace.
It will be forever debated what clubs should do in these circumstances. I was against the decision at the time. Pulled out the tape of the 2006 final v Port the other day. It could be argued that he should have gotten more out of that highly talented squad though. Hell, to have half of those names now..
Getting off topic here.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/handby-happy-at-noarlunga/story-e6freckc-1225899104645
LOL!!!
by Freo HeaveHo » Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:39 pm
saintal wrote:Freo HeaveHo wrote:Michael Handby since has left the club i see in a statement on the clubs website
Disappointing that a club vice captain and long time servant of the club would choose to end things like that, especially only with 2 games to go.
by The Panther » Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:55 pm
by darley16 » Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:35 pm
by westcoastpanther » Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:48 pm
darley16 wrote:Seems as a club we are dammed no matter what we do. Pyman was good coach until "disruption" occured amoungst the players and the coach therefore someone had to go. Clay Sampson was the logical and at the time the right decision however his inexperience became clear after 2 seasons and as much as all Southies are fans of Clay the right decision albeit difficult was taken.
At last we have the right coach with all the creditials any SANFL would be seeking, he has been there for one season and has clearly stamped upon all at the club want is demanded if you want success, if you don't, continue the way of the past 10 years. It is clear that injuries and spoilt players of the past who didn't like the changes and sulked away have both impacted our season and inspite of that apart from 3-4 games this team has plenty to offer and to build upon for the coming tenure under Ronnie (and John Reid has been a great allay to Ron and will continue in that understated roll). This year was foundation laying and laying down the law as required, i believe we have much to look forward to...if the AFL doesn't destroy the SANFL in the meantime.
by CENTURION » Sun Aug 22, 2010 11:47 am
by Bunton » Sun Aug 22, 2010 5:36 pm
by Sojourner » Sun Aug 22, 2010 8:15 pm
by Mickyj » Sun Aug 22, 2010 8:41 pm
Sojourner wrote:In respect to Handby, there are reasons why he was dropped to the Reserves this season and also last season. West Adelaide have made no secret that they are planning to have a go and recruit several key position players for next season, I have my doubts that they will be bothering to go after Handby, although I am more than happy to be proven wrong and wish him all the best if he is fortunate enough to get a go at another SANFL club.
Its easy to look back in retrospect, yet my view has always been that South Adelaide lost the plot and condemned the club to failure when it sacked their most successful coach John Reid because "he had lost the support of the players". It was an absolutely pathetic decision at the club that reeked and was then repeated a number of times between then and now, most notably when Robert Pyman had the very same treatment and the playing group were chosen over the coach that had got the SAFC to a finals campaign, no mean feat when you look at the current situation that the club finds itself in.
South have had no shortage of players that could not care less about the jumper of the club or its colours and that has been our biggest problem in recent years, the sheer number of players that have walked away is a real worry.
The other major issue at South is that of the SFL clubs allocated to the club for recruiting, one of them is a finals playing club, the rest are making up the numbers and regularly vying for the spoon.
Yet I can say that I am 100% behind Ron and his decisions to cut certain players from the club, I think that many in here would agree that Ron has done very well with some of his recruits that would easily be picked for any SANFL club going around. I feel we are a strong chance of recruiting some good players at the end of this season from both interstate and our competitors and for no real reason, still feel quite confident about the direction the club is taking, despite the results on the board so far. Often people are happy to heap it on the SAFC, yet in the last number of seasons, one SANFL club has beaten Central for the flag once, indicating that 7 other SANFL clubs have been the also rans of the SANFL and if its premierships that really matter are in a sense actually no better at all than the SAFC.
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Sun Aug 22, 2010 9:01 pm
Sojourner wrote:The other major issue at South is that of the SFL clubs allocated to the club for recruiting, one of them is a finals playing club, the rest are making up the numbers and regularly vying for the spoon.
by bayman » Sun Aug 22, 2010 9:26 pm
by blueandwhite » Sun Aug 22, 2010 9:42 pm
bayman wrote:would ron fuller be interested in 'mouse backwell' ? i know sturt were going to sign him this year before the shoulder injury & i'd imagine that there would be every chance that sturt will want him again next season, having said that south would be in a better position (financially) than sturt, i also know torrens valley is very interested in his services, but going back to the first question would ron be interested in mouse ?
by Bunton » Sun Aug 22, 2010 9:59 pm
85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:Sojourner wrote:The other major issue at South is that of the SFL clubs allocated to the club for recruiting, one of them is a finals playing club, the rest are making up the numbers and regularly vying for the spoon.
Correct me if I'm wrong Sojourner, but I thought Morphett Vale, Noarlunga, Pt Noarlunga and Reynella (or most of Reynella's zone anyway) were all in Souths zone, and haven't these clubs all played off in SFL finals in the past few years, including this years?
by Bunton » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:00 pm
bayman wrote:would ron fuller be interested in 'mouse backwell' ? i know sturt were going to sign him this year before the shoulder injury & i'd imagine that there would be every chance that sturt will want him again next season, having said that south would be in a better position (financially) than sturt, i also know torrens valley is very interested in his services, but going back to the first question would ron be interested in mouse ?
by Bunton » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:03 pm
Sojourner wrote:In respect to Handby, there are reasons why he was dropped to the Reserves this season and also last season. West Adelaide have made no secret that they are planning to have a go and recruit several key position players for next season, I have my doubts that they will be bothering to go after Handby, although I am more than happy to be proven wrong and wish him all the best if he is fortunate enough to get a go at another SANFL club.
Its easy to look back in retrospect, yet my view has always been that South Adelaide lost the plot and condemned the club to failure when it sacked their most successful coach John Reid because "he had lost the support of the players". It was an absolutely pathetic decision at the club that reeked and was then repeated a number of times between then and now, most notably when Robert Pyman had the very same treatment and the playing group were chosen over the coach that had got the SAFC to a finals campaign, no mean feat when you look at the current situation that the club finds itself in.
South have had no shortage of players that could not care less about the jumper of the club or its colours and that has been our biggest problem in recent years, the sheer number of players that have walked away is a real worry.
The other major issue at South is that of the SFL clubs allocated to the club for recruiting, one of them is a finals playing club, the rest are making up the numbers and regularly vying for the spoon.
Yet I can say that I am 100% behind Ron and his decisions to cut certain players from the club, I think that many in here would agree that Ron has done very well with some of his recruits that would easily be picked for any SANFL club going around. I feel we are a strong chance of recruiting some good players at the end of this season from both interstate and our competitors and for no real reason, still feel quite confident about the direction the club is taking, despite the results on the board so far. Often people are happy to heap it on the SAFC, yet in the last number of seasons, one SANFL club has beaten Central for the flag once, indicating that 7 other SANFL clubs have been the also rans of the SANFL and if its premierships that really matter are in a sense actually no better at all than the SAFC.
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:24 pm
Bunton wrote:I'd suggest what is of more relevance in the junior positons, with three south zones clubs (Hackham, Aldinga and Christies beach) taking the bottom 3 out of 4 spots in all of the 18, 16s and 14s.
by am Bays » Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:32 pm
Bunton wrote:Porties have scraped into a final 8 again this year, as have Noarlunga for the first time in a while. Other 2 have been regulars
I'd suggest what is of more relevance in the junior positons, with three south zones clubs (Hackham, Aldinga and Christies beach) taking the bottom 3 out of 4 spots in all of the 18, 16s and 14s.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |