by NO-MERCY » Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:17 pm
by Chocko » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:33 pm
by finn » Tue Aug 17, 2010 2:35 pm
Bulls forever wrote:Blacks130 wrote:I know what the enticement is, I just want to know what peple like you and FS think it is. Your suggestions of what they are a little ambiguous but probably best reflect your understanding of what goes on outside of your own club.Bulls forever wrote:
Blacks, if you think that some of your players are playing for the love of their mates, I think you must be delusional. Are they getting cash money, probably not, extend your thinking and imagine what your club could provide to these top end players to entice them to your club. Uni is a proud amateur league club and would not be happy with last couple of years in Div 2 instead of challenging for a Div 1 premiership. It required some action and obviously your administration had the tools required to entice some damn good players to your club, so as FS tried to say, well done and good luck, your club deserves the climb after the year they have had.
So FS and myself go from congratulating your club and what you have done this year to receiving a sermon from FINN on what you possibily might be offering some of your players. Let me say that if the players playing wanted big remuneration they would be in the country leagues, not SAAFL. So what do we have left as FINN so elaborately explained, employment, networking, accomodation - pretty much sums up what I was thinking. Probably the two jugs that swayed them though. I can see FS, getting the cartons out for next years recruiting campaign. I now officially withdraw the praise for your club that I posted and now hope that you go out in straight sets.
Oh, and let me guess you are studying politics, if we say it is black, you sure as h... will say it is white.
by Iron Fist » Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:17 pm
by shobtop1 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:45 pm
Iron Fist wrote:How are Walkerville looking at the moment?
Obviously making the 5 after just coming up is a huge task and they have done that
but is it a very different side to last season or have they just put in a huge pre season and got a few new blokes?
personally on last years sides, thought St peters were a much better side then Walkerville.
by Iron Fist » Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:50 pm
shobtop1 wrote:Iron Fist wrote:How are Walkerville looking at the moment?
Obviously making the 5 after just coming up is a huge task and they have done that
but is it a very different side to last season or have they just put in a huge pre season and got a few new blokes?
personally on last years sides, thought St peters were a much better side then Walkerville.
I think the difference between Walkerville and St Peters is the depth. If you look at the reserves ladder, Walkerville has won 15 games compared to SPOCS 5...says a bit.
Just a quick reflection on how tight Div 2 has been this year aswell, these are all the games won by 6 points or less.
Rd 2 Athelstone def Modbury 98 - 96
Rd 3 Walkerville def Modbury 95 - 93
Rd 4 Flinders def Walkerville 76 - 72
Rd 6 St Peters def Eastern Park 99 - 93
Rd 10 Uni def Rostrevor 62 - 60
Rd 11 Athelstone def Modbury 43 - 41
Rd 11 PHOS def Walkerville 79 - 75
Rd 13 Eastern Park def Modbury 123 - 120
Rd 13 St Peters def Pembroke 82 - 76
Rd 15 Uni def Athelstone 74 - 73
Rd 15 Walkerville def Rostrevor 95 - 89
Rd 16 Rostrevor def Flinders 80 - 74
Rd 17 Uni def Modbury 105 - 99
So that's 13 games decided by under a kick compared to 9 in Div 1 and 7 in Div 3. A relatively useless stat but it looks like Modbury were pretty unlucky not to play finals.
by Bulls forever » Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:15 pm
finn wrote:Bulls forever wrote:Blacks130 wrote:I know what the enticement is, I just want to know what peple like you and FS think it is. Your suggestions of what they are a little ambiguous but probably best reflect your understanding of what goes on outside of your own club.Bulls forever wrote:
Blacks, if you think that some of your players are playing for the love of their mates, I think you must be delusional. Are they getting cash money, probably not, extend your thinking and imagine what your club could provide to these top end players to entice them to your club. Uni is a proud amateur league club and would not be happy with last couple of years in Div 2 instead of challenging for a Div 1 premiership. It required some action and obviously your administration had the tools required to entice some damn good players to your club, so as FS tried to say, well done and good luck, your club deserves the climb after the year they have had.
So FS and myself go from congratulating your club and what you have done this year to receiving a sermon from FINN on what you possibily might be offering some of your players. Let me say that if the players playing wanted big remuneration they would be in the country leagues, not SAAFL. So what do we have left as FINN so elaborately explained, employment, networking, accomodation - pretty much sums up what I was thinking. Probably the two jugs that swayed them though. I can see FS, getting the cartons out for next years recruiting campaign. I now officially withdraw the praise for your club that I posted and now hope that you go out in straight sets.
Oh, and let me guess you are studying politics, if we say it is black, you sure as h... will say it is white.
I'm sorry that the expanation sounded like I was pontificating as it was not meant to be at all. Personally, I took no offence at all to FS's comments and thought they were pretty level - I wished to respond in the same manner without getting involved in any petty squabbling.
Cartons on a recruiting campaign is possibly a stroke of genius.
Back to the finals; good luck to all involved, obviously not enough luck that you beat the Blacks but a sizable dollop nonetheless.
by Blacks130 » Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:53 pm
Yes they will Bulls.Bulls forever wrote: Perhaps nyou can answer will Uni pay the SAAFL to play a home final on Sat week.
by Footy Smart » Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:05 am
Rd 2 Athelstone def Modbury 98 - 96
Rd 3 Walkerville def Modbury 95 - 93
Rd 4 Flinders def Walkerville 76 - 72
Rd 6 St Peters def Eastern Park 99 - 93
Rd 10 Uni def Rostrevor 62 - 60
Rd 11 Athelstone def Modbury 43 - 41
Rd 11 PHOS def Walkerville 79 - 75
Rd 13 Eastern Park def Modbury 123 - 120
Rd 13 St Peters def Pembroke 82 - 76
Rd 15 Uni def Athelstone 74 - 73
Rd 15 Walkerville def Rostrevor 95 - 89
Rd 16 Rostrevor def Flinders 80 - 74
Rd 17 Uni def Modbury 105 - 99
So that's 13 games decided by under a kick compared to 9 in Div 1 and 7 in Div 3. A relatively useless stat but it looks like Modbury were pretty unlucky not to play finals.
by S Demon » Sat Aug 21, 2010 6:34 pm
by alcho-pop » Sat Aug 21, 2010 6:54 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:Your right their Booza. i think they'll win the flag this year.
would of learnt alot from their first year in Div 2 last year.
by Footy Chick » Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:03 pm
alcho-pop wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Your right their Booza. i think they'll win the flag this year.
would of learnt alot from their first year in Div 2 last year.
Phos too good at camden oval today, running over the top of EP in the last quarter. EP looked up and running in the 3rd quarter but PHOS mainly Rowe, took advantage of the scoring end massively in the last.
On a side note cannot believe the league let a final be played on an oval in that sort of condition, i know there was a lot of rainfall this week but surely there would have been a better option for a better spectacle??
by S Demon » Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:06 pm
Footy Chick wrote:alcho-pop wrote:Phos too good at camden oval today, running over the top of EP in the last quarter. EP looked up and running in the 3rd quarter but PHOS mainly Rowe, took advantage of the scoring end massively in the last.
On a side note cannot believe the league let a final be played on an oval in that sort of condition, i know there was a lot of rainfall this week but surely there would have been a better option for a better spectacle??
Wah wah wah, we've just had the wettest season for about 8 years - if you can find another oval that isn't trashed, then good luck to you. Footy is a winter sport, remember?
by Senor Moto Gadili » Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:09 pm
alcho-pop wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Your right their Booza. i think they'll win the flag this year.
would of learnt alot from their first year in Div 2 last year.
Phos too good at camden oval today, running over the top of EP in the last quarter. EP looked up and running in the 3rd quarter but PHOS mainly Rowe, took advantage of the scoring end massively in the last.
On a side note cannot believe the league let a final be played on an oval in that sort of condition, i know there was a lot of rainfall this week but surely there would have been a better option for a better spectacle??
by Blacks130 » Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:34 pm
Nonsense. Where out of interest would or could it have been played and not had suffered as a game?alcho-pop wrote:On a side note cannot believe the league let a final be played on an oval in that sort of condition, i know there was a lot of rainfall this week but surely there would have been a better option for a better spectacle??
by locky801 » Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:36 pm
Blacks130 wrote:Nonsense. Where out of interest would or could it have been played and not had suffered as a game?alcho-pop wrote:On a side note cannot believe the league let a final be played on an oval in that sort of condition, i know there was a lot of rainfall this week but surely there would have been a better option for a better spectacle??
by Blacks130 » Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:51 pm
Reflective of how much footy has been played there in the last few months. All the SAAFL needed was 12 grounds with clubs that have wound up and it would've been OKlocky801 wrote:Blacks130 wrote:Nonsense. Where out of interest would or could it have been played and not had suffered as a game?alcho-pop wrote:On a side note cannot believe the league let a final be played on an oval in that sort of condition, i know there was a lot of rainfall this week but surely there would have been a better option for a better spectacle??
Cane Reserve is a picture, very little footy, have had my Juniors out there training, very little mud, a little soft under foot but apart from that a great surface
by The Ruckman » Sat Aug 21, 2010 10:15 pm
by bandar » Sun Aug 22, 2010 1:22 am
alcho-pop wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Your right their Booza. i think they'll win the flag this year.
would of learnt alot from their first year in Div 2 last year.
Phos too good at camden oval today, running over the top of EP in the last quarter. EP looked up and running in the 3rd quarter but PHOS mainly Rowe, took advantage of the scoring end massively in the last.
On a side note cannot believe the league let a final be played on an oval in that sort of condition, i know there was a lot of rainfall this week but surely there would have been a better option for a better spectacle??
by finn » Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:43 pm
locky801 wrote:Blacks130 wrote:Nonsense. Where out of interest would or could it have been played and not had suffered as a game?alcho-pop wrote:On a side note cannot believe the league let a final be played on an oval in that sort of condition, i know there was a lot of rainfall this week but surely there would have been a better option for a better spectacle??
Cane Reserve is a picture, very little footy, have had my Juniors out there training, very little mud, a little soft under foot but apart from that a great surface
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |