Agree Heater...
At best, it needs to have a separate category... if not completely ignored!
by Media Park » Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:25 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by The Angry Bull » Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:12 pm
Media Park wrote:gadj1976 wrote:I think it's fine to give this a run as a couple of exhibition games but to have it as our domestic cricket competition is pure lunacy.
I thought that's what T20 was...
When we played NZ with Punter, Catfish and co, with Chris Cairns sporting a massive 'fro, and McGrath feinting bowling underarm...
Now look at it...
by Media Park » Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:19 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by MAY-Z » Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:45 am
Gozu wrote:NFC wrote:Well, I'll be attending the standard 50 over FRC games, and then will refuse to attend the split innings matches as it's a complete and utter farce.
There will be standard 50 over ODD games? I thought this format was replacing them altogether?
Also will these hybrid games now be considered First Class games?
by MAY-Z » Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:48 am
jackpot jim wrote::butthead:![]()
![]()
This ridiculous new preposed format is more likely to turn fans away from the game than attract new ones.
It wont be until the 50 over game is dead and buried before people realise how good it was.
The problem was that there were simply toooo many programmed which turned people off it. Two teams playing a meaningless 7 match series in 12 days which has happened regularly in recent years has killed the interest in it.
Can also see interest in the 20/20 game dropping off pretty quick if they program too many of them.
by The Angry Bull » Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:33 pm
by brod » Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:10 pm
by jackpot jim » Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:25 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |