by teaoby » Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:53 pm
by teaoby » Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:55 pm
Iron Fist wrote:Para Hills have Old Igg's CBC and Scotch???
I cant see you winning all 3 of those like you predict by ya ladder X Runna
by piccachu » Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:59 pm
if cbc get their numbers back then sure. but i can see them beating portland and the iggies game will be 50/50.
think it will come down to how well Phan and Thredgold come up for them. phan's knee is very iffy and thredgold has had a month plus off and the ankle (i think) may not be the best. but in saying that having douglas back is the biggest in for them because it releases hegerty and raidis who are sweepers more then in and under.
by X Runna » Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:49 pm
Iron Fist wrote:Para Hills have Old Igg's CBC and Scotch???
I cant see you winning all 3 of those like you predict by ya ladder X Runna
by X Runna » Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:56 pm
piccachu wrote:if cbc get their numbers back then sure. but i can see them beating portland and the iggies game will be 50/50.
think it will come down to how well Phan and Thredgold come up for them. phan's knee is very iffy and thredgold has had a month plus off and the ankle (i think) may not be the best. but in saying that having douglas back is the biggest in for them because it releases hegerty and raidis who are sweepers more then in and under.
what is everyones oppinion on CBC when we played them earlier in the year they seem to have close to there full list and were were near enough to it also and we beat them by near on 9 goals i think. it was in the wet which i think was a big advantage for us but have not seen them in the dry obviously there results from earlier in the year indicate there a bloody good side but im yet to see that side, douglas is a gun but seemed to have to do way to much against us and got caught numerous times. i also think Iggies are slipping under the radar. on paper there side is a cracker and i think they are going to be very dangerous in the finals race
by Flipper » Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:03 pm
X Runna wrote:piccachu wrote:if cbc get their numbers back then sure. but i can see them beating portland and the iggies game will be 50/50.
think it will come down to how well Phan and Thredgold come up for them. phan's knee is very iffy and thredgold has had a month plus off and the ankle (i think) may not be the best. but in saying that having douglas back is the biggest in for them because it releases hegerty and raidis who are sweepers more then in and under.
what is everyones oppinion on CBC when we played them earlier in the year they seem to have close to there full list and were were near enough to it also and we beat them by near on 9 goals i think. it was in the wet which i think was a big advantage for us but have not seen them in the dry obviously there results from earlier in the year indicate there a bloody good side but im yet to see that side, douglas is a gun but seemed to have to do way to much against us and got caught numerous times. i also think Iggies are slipping under the radar. on paper there side is a cracker and i think they are going to be very dangerous in the finals race
I think they are a great side. You are right Piccachu, full list, dry warm weather and big grounds - they are really good.
Got off to a good head start early in the year, lost a couple under wintry conditions but with key players back from injury and the weather likely to be a bit better in the next 6 or 7 weeks - I can see them qualifying highly and probably making the grand final.
by Iron Fist » Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:25 pm
by SATCHEL » Thu Jul 29, 2010 6:41 pm
teaoby wrote:if cbc get their numbers back then sure. but i can see them beating portland and the iggies game will be 50/50.
think it will come down to how well Phan and Thredgold come up for them. phan's knee is very iffy and thredgold has had a month plus off and the ankle (i think) may not be the best. but in saying that having douglas back is the biggest in for them because it releases hegerty and raidis who are sweepers more then in and under.
by Trader » Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:53 pm
teaoby wrote:seaton: kilburn, mitcham, pac
mitcham: pac, seaton, kilburn
(Bold are the away games).
by NO-MERCY » Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:23 pm
piccachu wrote:As for you MFW, I'd be more worried about your own side before throwing stones champ, last year was only a start as to the players your gonna lose at the end of this year.
interesting statement NM from last year we lost nathan martinovic and shaun hughes (who only played 3 Agrade games last year) if my memory serves me correctly NM your mob offered perko and Las the world and still couldnt tempt them across, and i cant see to many of the lads leaving, infact i think recruiting for next year has started already and things are looking really good mate
Sorry thought this was aimed at portland
by teaoby » Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:44 pm
Trader wrote:teaoby wrote:seaton: kilburn, mitcham, pac
mitcham: pac, seaton, kilburn
(Bold are the away games).
Are Seaton and Mitcham playing at a neutral venue or something?
Oh, and how do portland finished 12 & 8 in an 18 game season?
FWIW, here's my go...
PAC
Iggies
CBC
Portland
Seaton
SMOSH
by Trader » Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:51 pm
teaoby wrote:gimme a break we all know math is your specialty anyway
by Hellboy » Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:20 am
Trader wrote:teaoby wrote:gimme a break we all know math is your specialty anyway
Stirring the sh!t is my only speciality, oh, and identifying $lutty forwards.
by Latte Lad » Fri Jul 30, 2010 8:54 am
Hellboy wrote:Trader wrote:teaoby wrote:gimme a break we all know math is your specialty anyway
Stirring the sh!t is my only speciality, oh, and identifying $lutty forwards.
Amen to that
by piccachu » Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:39 am
Perkins was offered the world $60 a win , if you've heard any different well someones telling little porky's at your club.
Las was never spoken to either.
but he is well known for porky pies aswellyou got a couple of good ones in perkins and laslett we offered them the world and still couldnt get them across
by pom pom » Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:00 am
by Flipper » Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:15 am
Iron Fist wrote:galps is a huge out.
what is wrong with him??
a good side needs to be able to play in all weather types.
And I think that winter will run a little longer this year so unlike years passed. We will be playing finals in the wet.
by silent hour » Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:23 am
by Footy Chick » Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:25 am
by Slots It Through » Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:42 am
pom pom wrote:Can someone please explain to me why a professional SANFL coach when disciplining a young very talented player for missing training, not only decides the player cannot play for that SANFL club over the weekend (fair enough) BUT decides to tell that player he will NOT play anywhere at all?????? Gee that really gives a young player confidence and keeps him fit and in form to not play any footy. Good way of loosing young gifted players from our game at an age when they are easily swayed to other areas in life. Maybe someone from Alberton way can give me a SATISFACTORY answer????
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |