by gossipgirl » Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:19 pm
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:52 pm
by Sojourner » Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:04 pm
by Dutchy » Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:12 pm
SJABC wrote:Dutchy, what constitutes a "Blockbuster" game in your view?
by MAY-Z » Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:17 pm
Dutchy wrote:SJABC wrote:Dutchy, what constitutes a "Blockbuster" game in your view?
Derbys, Showdowns, Coll/Ess, Car/Coll, Car/Ess, Car/Rich
When the above matches must be in the program twice a year then what does it leave for the rest? Not much.
We play Essendon, Collingwood, Richmond and Carlton once a year without fail.
Roos host all 6 interstate clubs as home games this year.
Collingwood host 2 interstate clubs at home this year.
Ess/Carl host 4 interstate clubs at home this year.
You cant deny that the comp is set up for the rich to get rich and the poor to remain poor.
I understand we dont have the fan base but we do have the best fan>member ratio in the comp so that proves the club works hard to convert fans into members.
by Dutchy » Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:34 pm
by MAY-Z » Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:42 pm
Dutchy wrote:Ok give us an even draw then, you cant have it both ways!
BTW this is just an increase to the competitive balance fund, not an additional grab for cash.
by Dutchy » Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:09 pm
by am Bays » Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:58 pm
Dutchy wrote:So what would you propose to deal with the inequalities of the draw?
by Squawk » Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:59 pm
by Dutchy » Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:31 pm
am Bays wrote:Dutchy wrote:So what would you propose to deal with the inequalities of the draw?
Git rid of four Melbourne clubs - relocate them into the VFL so their fans don't "lose" their club
Everyone plays each other twice over 26 weeks.
Simple done.
by Booney » Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:35 pm
Dutchy wrote:am Bays wrote:Dutchy wrote:So what would you propose to deal with the inequalities of the draw?
Git rid of four Melbourne clubs - relocate them into the VFL so their fans don't "lose" their club
Everyone plays each other twice over 26 weeks.
Simple done.
Thats it, get rid of more clubs and create more franchises
by Gozu » Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:35 pm
Quichey wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/tax-could-cost-pies-300000-a-season-20100726-10so6.html
THE AFL has unveiled a Robin Hood-style plan to tax the wealthy clubs in a bid to help the poorer clubs in a controversial increase in attendance levies under which Collingwood, Essendon, Hawthorn and Geelong would be charged an extra $1 a fan at the turnstiles.
by Barto » Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:37 pm
by am Bays » Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:04 pm
Dutchy wrote:Thats it, get rid of more clubs and create more franchises
by Hondo » Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:28 pm
by am Bays » Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:37 pm
Hondo wrote:am, that's cliched rubbish I am sorry to say
You're on the wrong board if you want the hand clap icon for repetitive, unoriginal pay-outs of the AFL!
by Hondo » Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:54 pm
by Hondo » Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:28 pm
by Booney » Thu Jul 29, 2010 8:54 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |