by Big Phil » Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:37 pm
by Mad Mat » Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:04 pm
by am Bays » Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:09 pm
Mad Mat wrote:So is he playing for free, or do the dogs have room to fit him in under their salary cap?
by Dutchy » Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:17 am
doggies4eva wrote:Dutchy wrote:Rudolph was completely different, he started training in prep for 2010, not to play league in 2009. I presume Slade isnt doing this to play ressies for the rest of the year.
Would he be doing this if the Dogs were bottom?
Dogs.....bottom......oxymoron
or are you gay?
by Big Phil » Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:29 am
by doggies4eva » Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:23 am
Dutchy wrote:doggies4eva wrote:Dutchy wrote:Rudolph was completely different, he started training in prep for 2010, not to play league in 2009. I presume Slade isnt doing this to play ressies for the rest of the year.
Would he be doing this if the Dogs were bottom?
Dogs.....bottom......oxymoron
or are you gay?
by Grahaml » Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:20 am
by twosheds » Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:13 am
Grahaml wrote:Just a natural though for someone I would have thought. I expect Luke McCabe felt similarly when he returned. I guess in the end it comes down to how much confidence he has, whether he's happy to play out the year in the 2s if he can't crack the top grade and whether he'd rather not know if he still had it, or be shown up a bit. Needless to say, he won't be remembered badly if it goes pear shaped. Steinberner isn't remembered for the last stint he had where it didn't go so great.
by whatfuture » Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:27 pm
by Mad Mat » Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:54 pm
am Bays wrote:Mad Mat wrote:So is he playing for free, or do the dogs have room to fit him in under their salary cap?
If he plays twos he'd only be costing $100 a week and I'd imagine he'd be on basic matchies if he ever made it to the ones. That would've all been explained to him when they talked. He'd only take what they'd already budgeted to pay someone else already.
No salary cap implications what-so-ever.
by bulldogproud2 » Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:22 pm
whatfuture wrote:What does this decision say to the Juniors at Centrals that have played ressies or league all year. Also doesnt do much for Junior development at a club where Junior Development is already poor.
16s and 18s struggling this year. U/15 Country Development squad well below par this year (didnt have the best players picked or wanting to play as well as most players being played out of position, went goalless in their last game). When Scott Stevens states that over 75% of Centrals League players are a product of their local leagues and Junior squads then things arent all as good as it may seem long term at the Ponderosa.
by sjt » Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:27 pm
bulldogproud2 wrote:whatfuture wrote:What does this decision say to the Juniors at Centrals that have played ressies or league all year. Also doesnt do much for Junior development at a club where Junior Development is already poor.
16s and 18s struggling this year. U/15 Country Development squad well below par this year (didnt have the best players picked or wanting to play as well as most players being played out of position, went goalless in their last game). When Scott Stevens states that over 75% of Centrals League players are a product of their local leagues and Junior squads then things arent all as good as it may seem long term at the Ponderosa.
Surely you are not saying that the inclusion of one player (a player who has played in eight premierships, given wonderful service including being a former club captain) is going to have an impact on junior development at the club?? The same effort will be placed into developing juniors as is currently occurring. Sladey's return does nothing to change this.
Also, it just adds competition for onball spots at league and reserves level, which surely cannot be a bad thing. Sladey knows that he will only gain a league spot if his form warrants it. No favours will be given at all. However, given the loss of O'Sullvan for what is likely to be the full season and other injuries sustained at Central this year, Sladey is a useful backup.
Cheers
by Dogwatcher » Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:31 pm
by bulldogproud2 » Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:33 pm
by whufc » Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:12 pm
bulldogproud2 wrote:Agree wholeheartedly. His experience will be invaluable, even just on the training track if not in matches.
by JK » Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:21 pm
by whufc » Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:33 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:At the end of the day it's a decision/move that only needs to please one set of supporters .. If our club had a void to fill, and we had a much loved proven performer that wasn't long out of the game (like Stuey Bown [different circumstances I know]) I wouldn't have an issue with him returning so long as he was selected on form rather than anything else.
I would have thought this could only be a plus for the Dogs, if he's not playing well enough he doesn't get selected but mentors kids who look up to him and if he is playing well enough then it's a huge inclusion with oodles of September/October experience.
Just my $0.02 worth.
by whufc » Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:55 pm
by doggies4eva » Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:32 pm
by Big Phil » Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:39 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |