Tribunal outcomes

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby topsywaldron » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:39 pm

sjt wrote:Actually, looking through your moronic posts Staritski it was one of your better ones. Couldn't you find room to mention Centrelink, dole etc and let the hilarity continue.


And you for once have failed to mention Range Rovers or chardonnay. Well done.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby sjt » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:41 pm

aceman wrote:
sjt wrote:Actually, looking through your moronic posts Staritski it was one of your better ones. Couldn't you find room to mention Centrelink, dole etc and let the hilarity continue.



That's a bit "harsh and unwarranted", isn't it?


Look through his 35 posts, there's quite a common thread. Not harsh, probably unwarranted.
And he "bags" Big Phil for actually doing some research and presenting us with some facts.
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby smac » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:41 pm

topsywaldron wrote:
sjt wrote:Actually, looking through your moronic posts Staritski it was one of your better ones. Couldn't you find room to mention Centrelink, dole etc and let the hilarity continue.


And you for once have failed to mention Range Rovers or chardonnay. Well done.

A quick search indicates sjt has never posted either term.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby sjt » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:43 pm

topsywaldron wrote:
sjt wrote:Actually, looking through your moronic posts Staritski it was one of your better ones. Couldn't you find room to mention Centrelink, dole etc and let the hilarity continue.


And you for once have failed to mention Range Rovers or chardonnay. Well done.


I'd like you to show me once where I've mentioned either, at least once?? What are you talking about?
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby goraw » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:51 pm

sjt wrote:Actually, looking through your moronic posts Staritski it was one of your better ones. Couldn't you find room to mention Centrelink, dole etc and let the hilarity continue.


show me another SANFL ground that u can rock the roof of centrelink from inside the gate ;)
goraw
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:16 am
Location: prospect
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Gaza

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby Booney » Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:56 pm

sjt wrote:
aceman wrote:
sjt wrote:Actually, looking through your moronic posts Staritski it was one of your better ones. Couldn't you find room to mention Centrelink, dole etc and let the hilarity continue.



That's a bit "harsh and unwarranted", isn't it?


Look through his 35 posts, there's quite a common thread. Not harsh, probably unwarranted.
And he "bags" Big Phil for actually doing some research and presenting us with some facts.


Well, there is no place for that sort of thing on this site. Facts are not welcome in here. ;)
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61792
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8227 times
Been liked: 11958 times

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby Apachebulldog » Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:17 pm

You are quite correct Aceman, i also have noted that STARSHITSKI has a habit of mentioning the dole for some reason, as mentioned on one of my previous posts what has dole/centrelink got to do with discussing football ????
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: On the prairie
Has liked: 381 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby doggies4eva » Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:41 pm

Booney wrote:
sjt wrote:
aceman wrote:
sjt wrote:Actually, looking through your moronic posts Staritski it was one of your better ones. Couldn't you find room to mention Centrelink, dole etc and let the hilarity continue.



That's a bit "harsh and unwarranted", isn't it?


Look through his 35 posts, there's quite a common thread. Not harsh, probably unwarranted.
And he "bags" Big Phil for actually doing some research and presenting us with some facts.


Well, there is no place for that sort of thing on this site. Facts are not welcome in here. ;)


:? Isn't that a fact Booney :shock:
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby JK » Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:42 pm

doggies4eva wrote: :? Isn't that a fact Booney :shock:


Not if it came from Booney ;)
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:42 pm

goraw wrote:
sjt wrote:Actually, looking through your moronic posts Staritski it was one of your better ones. Couldn't you find room to mention Centrelink, dole etc and let the hilarity continue.


show me another SANFL ground that u can rock the roof of centrelink from inside the gate ;)


A slingshot maybe but not a throw ;)
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby CUTTERMAN » Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:03 pm

Apachebulldog wrote:You are quite correct Aceman, i also have noted that STARSHITSKI has a habit of mentioning the dole for some reason, as mentioned on one of my previous posts what has dole/centrelink got to do with discussing football ????

or the relativity of the number of premiership medals a player has and their onfield behavior? :)
'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.
CUTTERMAN
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:50 pm
Has liked: 214 times
Been liked: 126 times

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby whufc » Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:34 pm

CUTTERMAN wrote:
Apachebulldog wrote:You are quite correct Aceman, i also have noted that STARSHITSKI has a habit of mentioning the dole for some reason, as mentioned on one of my previous posts what has dole/centrelink got to do with discussing football ????

or the relativity of the number of premiership medals a player has and their onfield behavior? :)


well obviously if they were as thuggish as everyone makes them out they wouldnt be on the park to win these premiership medals ;) ;)
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28772
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5963 times
Been liked: 2852 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby EasyE » Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:48 pm

I love the fact that so many Norwood supporters are getting so upset about the Gowans' antics.

I grew up watching Gary McIntosh thug his way aroung the competition and i presume that you lot had no complaints then? Can anyone provide a tribunal history of his for a comparison?

The Gowans are certainly not angels on the footy field, but they are definately not the pioneers of this behaviour. Anyone reading this would think it was a gentlemans game before they arrived!
User avatar
EasyE
Member
 
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 1:17 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby JK » Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:03 pm

EasyE wrote:I love the fact that so many Norwood supporters are getting so upset about the Gowans' antics.


I counted one in this thread, maybe Booney is right, what place do facts have on a forum, much easier to make things up as you go along huh?
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby stampy » Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:32 pm

goraw wrote:
SJABC wrote:So both players throw a punch and nothing :roll:


the way it should be


tell stephen kernahan that :roll:
Go The Tiges!!!
stampy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9089
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has liked: 78 times
Been liked: 379 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby topsywaldron » Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:51 pm

sjt wrote:What are you talking about?


That each club has an dumb stereotype attached to them not just Centrals.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby sjt » Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:11 pm

topsywaldron wrote:
sjt wrote:What are you talking about?


That each club has an dumb stereotype attached to them not just Centrals.


I realise this. My post was directed to someone that likes to use these stereotypes. Your post was directed to me ( I don't believe I push these stereotypes). Don't know why you tried to defend his post. Did you think BP's post (re the tribunal history) was one eyed and biased also?
sjt
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2295
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 pm
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby gossipgirl » Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:30 am

sjt wrote:Actually, looking through your moronic posts Staritski it was one of your better ones. Couldn't you find room to mention Centrelink, dole etc and let the hilarity continue.


and dont forget the Flares ..... where have the Flares gone ...... I miss them so :D
Adelaide Crows World champions 2017 - Crows 4.11 to Lions 4.5
gossipgirl
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1672
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:04 pm
Location: Looking for all the Boats
Has liked: 1541 times
Been liked: 57 times
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby Big Phil » Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:58 pm

Jason Sutherland from Central found NOT GUILTY of striking from the game against West Adelaide on the weekend...

http://www.sanfl.com.au/league/reports/
User avatar
Big Phil
Coach
 
Posts: 20299
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:56 pm
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 284 times

Re: Tribunal outcomes

Postby fish » Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:00 pm

Big Phil wrote:Jason Sutherland from Central found NOT GUILTY of striking from the game against West Adelaide on the weekend...

http://www.sanfl.com.au/league/reports/

Cheers BP!
User avatar
fish
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6908
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:28 pm
Has liked: 190 times
Been liked: 48 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], pmackk and 25 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |