by Dogwatcher » Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:18 am
by topsywaldron » Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:21 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:In a few days time, I'm only just getting over the Sturt match.
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:33 pm
by JK » Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:44 pm
by doggies4eva » Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:50 pm
by Squawk » Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:00 pm
doggies4eva wrote:Norwood have got a quality mid-field and in my view was the reason we lost last time.
But we didn't have Boyd in the team then and he is starting to hit his straps so this game will be interesting as I would expect this to be important on the larger oval.
by Squawk » Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:08 pm
The Apostle AK wrote:If Norwood win: they get to sing their club song at Elizabeth for the 2nd time this year...
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:14 pm
Squawk wrote: You're just lucky that Norwood and SANFL great Thomas Seymour Hill actually (enthusiastically) let you apply to join the SANFL in the first place.
by topsywaldron » Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:24 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:
by doggies4eva » Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:27 pm
Squawk wrote:doggies4eva wrote:Norwood have got a quality mid-field and in my view was the reason we lost last time.
But we didn't have Boyd in the team then and he is starting to hit his straps so this game will be interesting as I would expect this to be important on the larger oval.
Boyd played in Rd 11 at Norwood. He had 6 kicks, 5 marks, 10 handballs and 5 tackles.
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:29 pm
topsywaldron wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:
Couldn't find any genuflecting photos?
by Squawk » Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:31 pm
doggies4eva wrote:Squawk wrote:doggies4eva wrote:Norwood have got a quality mid-field and in my view was the reason we lost last time.
But we didn't have Boyd in the team then and he is starting to hit his straps so this game will be interesting as I would expect this to be important on the larger oval.
Boyd played in Rd 11 at Norwood. He had 6 kicks, 5 marks, 10 handballs and 5 tackles.
Thnaks squawk. I should have checked my facts. I am hoping that he (and the other mid-fielders) have run into better form for next week's game.
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:32 pm
by topsywaldron » Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:34 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:We're not worthy my friend, not worthy.
by Squawk » Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:40 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Didn't you hear, the State Government's making it easier for him by making the one way road a two way road! Petrol costs cut.
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:42 pm
by HeartBeatsTrue » Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:45 pm
Yeah but he could be playing at another club (or even retired) by the time those projects finishSquawk wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Didn't you hear, the State Government's making it easier for him by making the one way road a two way road! Petrol costs cut.
Actually, you can add to that the Northern Expressway and the Tram overpass over South Rd too
He must have some political clout the young fella!
by Grahaml » Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:19 pm
by HeartBeatsTrue » Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:35 pm
Grahaml wrote:And perhaps playing big grounds suits Norwood more than Central, but it suits the dogs more.
by maccad » Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:47 am
doggies4eva wrote:Norwood have got a quality mid-field and in my view was the reason we lost last time.
But we didn't have Boyd in the team then and he is starting to hit his straps so this game will be interesting as I would expect this to be important on the larger oval.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |