Footy Budget

[Iron Fist]

Given it was published the first time with permission, I believe it then becomes the, erm, intellectual property of the Budget. Technically, they could run it as the front cover for the rest of the year

They never did get permission though Quichey, not once has Luke or anyone asked for permission before they printed it.
So therefore do i have grounds for a legal case??

[Iron Fist]

Given it was published the first time with permission, I believe it then becomes the, erm, intellectual property of the Budget. Technically, they could run it as the front cover for the rest of the year

Actually thats a good idea
may go have a chat to some lawyers about all this and see where it stands!
cheers Quichey

[Jimmy_041]

Matters that are in the public interest may be published with your permission

So, yes........ you have grounds for an action

[Iron Fist]

Matters that are in the public interest may be published with your permission

So, yes........ you have grounds for an action

Thanks Jimmy

[Jimmy_041]

Matters that are in the public interest may be published without your permission

So, yes........ you have grounds for an action

Thanks Jimmy

1. made an error - now corrected. Meaning, your photo is definitely not in the public interest
2. Wouldn't rely on what I say

[piccachu]

[quote][1. made an error - now corrected. Meaning, your photo is definitely not in the public interest
2. Wouldn't rely on what I say/quote]

i like it well played jimmy

[Mr Beefy]

[1. made an error - now corrected. Meaning, your photo is definitely not in the public interest
2. Wouldn't rely on what I say

i like it well played jimmy

They may be trying to attract the gay market to the footy rag

[Top End]

[1. made an error - now corrected. Meaning, your photo is definitely not in the public interest
2. Wouldn't rely on what I say

i like it well played jimmy

They may be trying to attract the gay market to the footy rag

A lovely photo but think I will not be picking up the soap anymore in the Changerooms. It is the sock down the Mankini that does it though

[Choccies]

That mankini looks a little different from behind I must say....

[Iron Fist]

That mankini looks a little different from behind I must say....

looks like Hosie wearing a singlet.
Look at the lovely bleeched blond hair.

[Boosh]

Given it was published the first time with permission, I believe it then becomes the, erm, intellectual property of the Budget. Technically, they could run it as the front cover for the rest of the year

Actually thats a good idea
may go have a chat to some lawyers about all this and see where it stands!
cheers Quichey

I think you will find that if the person in the photo is a willing participant and is aware of the photo being taken then the photo is the property of the person who took the pic not the person in it. However you might be able to get compensation from the person (Tom Lipson) who pushed for the photo to be published for their own benefit at your expense, whether that be financial or personal.

[Top End]

Given it was published the first time with permission, I believe it then becomes the, erm, intellectual property of the Budget. Technically, they could run it as the front cover for the rest of the year

Actually thats a good idea
may go have a chat to some lawyers about all this and see where it stands!
cheers Quichey

I think you will find that if the person in the photo is a willing participant and is aware of the photo being taken then the photo is the property of the person who took the pic not the person in it. However you might be able to get compensation from the person (Tom Lipson) who pushed for the photo to be published for their own benefit at your expense, whether that be financial or personal.

Now while Lippo might not be faultless perhaps Mr Piccachu might be able to shed more light on things I am told. Have even heard that Piccachu wanted the BIG MAN STORE as the advert on the same page just for fun

[Sturtman]

Given it was published the first time with permission, I believe it then becomes the, erm, intellectual property of the Budget. Technically, they could run it as the front cover for the rest of the year

Actually thats a good idea
may go have a chat to some lawyers about all this and see where it stands!
cheers Quichey

[Sturtman]

Matters that are in the public interest may be published with your permission

So, yes........ you have grounds for an action

Thanks Jimmy

[S Demon]

It's the vibe...

[SATCHEL]

Given it was published the first time with permission, I believe it then becomes the, erm, intellectual property of the Budget. Technically, they could run it as the front cover for the rest of the year

Actually thats a good idea
may go have a chat to some lawyers about all this and see where it stands!
cheers Quichey

I think you will find that if the person in the photo is a willing participant and is aware of the photo being taken then the photo is the property of the person who took the pic not the person in it. However you might be able to get compensation from the person (Tom Lipson) who pushed for the photo to be published for their own benefit at your expense, whether that be financial or personal.

Now while Lippo might not be faultless perhaps Mr Piccachu might be able to shed more light on things I am told. Have even heard that Piccachu wanted the BIG MAN STORE as the advert on the same page just for fun

I can confirm this as he was boasting about it at training last night. He also said that he has more scandelous material he wants to publish. I feel that this makes him a target for retaliation. A serious judgement on character for Picapoo is needed. I already have mine. He is a sh!t Bloke full stop

[Top End]

Actually thats a good idea
may go have a chat to some lawyers about all this and see where it stands!
cheers Quichey[/quote]

I think you will find that if the person in the photo is a willing participant and is aware of the photo being taken then the photo is the property of the person who took the pic not the person in it. However you might be able to get compensation from the person (Tom Lipson) who pushed for the photo to be published for their own benefit at your expense, whether that be financial or personal.[/quote]

Now while Lippo might not be faultless perhaps Mr Piccachu might be able to shed more light on things I am told. Have even heard that Piccachu wanted the BIG MAN STORE as the advert on the same page just for fun[/quote]

I can confirm this as he was boasting about it at training last night. He also said that he has more scandelous material he wants to publish. I feel that this makes him a target for retaliation. A serious judgement on character for Picapoo is needed. I already have mine. He is a sh!t Bloke full stop [/quote]

[b]Maybe a Fisty Calender a bit like the Mawson Lakes one with the sheila, although I know which one is best to look at and Fisty is not in the same League. Any scandelous photos would be used I am sure especially if Piccachu is involved. On another thought maybe no more Fisty please but a bit of scandal is always good and you know they will always get used