EP Football - PLFL, GFFL, MWFL, FWFL, EEFL

[ironknob]

we won by 5 pts and our B's won by 1.

[eags]

Better check my tips there MP

Tasmans 1-39
Souths 40+
Waybacks 1-39

[therealROSSCO]

hey look - UA you may be right.... maybe I did read too much into the games today....hats off to the winners....tasmans by just 5, waybacks by enough (very good win considering) and souths..... speaking about Lincoln South, how are they travelling!!!....7 - 0 - surely they are short priced favourites to win the flag......

[barksoff]

souths win easy to a pathetic bostons king bog jerry,story,white,north,hall, dunn 4 goals 3 taylor pappy would have to be bostons best player he has a real dislike for souths and will cost them a game or two in the future i hope like hell he dosnt get any finals as it would be a 2 goal advantage to any side that plays souths.
AG odds on who dislikes souths more wcp or pappy?

[zoo poo]

barksoff i totally agree with you pappy gave a 50m penalty for a tummy tap but went back 110mtrs he done his best to make it interesting totally agree i loved kings game.souths were good but nothing between souths waybacks tassies and mallees a good year to make the 4 and as for who hates souths more i know where moneys going

[ironknob]

barksoff i totally agree with you pappy gave a 50m penalty for a tummy tap but went back 110mtrs he done his best to make it interesting totally agree i loved kings game.souths were good but nothing between souths waybacks tassies and mallees a good year to make the 4 and as for who hates souths more i know where moneys going

everyone?? (except the league commissioners)

[djd]

can someone post the lincoln scores, i am assuming tasmans and waybacks by less then 39 and souths +39. in GF ramblers showed they are the team to beat by accounting for yeelanna by 6 goals. jim holman and tyson micken (gun, and your nephew KWF?) both back. cougars by 60 points over tumby.

[westcoastpanther]

in GF ramblers showed they are the team to beat by accounting for yeelanna by 6 goals.

Your not wrong there, everyone else just making up numbers in GF, including the undefeated Cougars.

Get your hand off it coach.....

[steiger]

in GF ramblers showed they are the team to beat by accounting for yeelanna by 6 goals.

Your not wrong there, everyone else just making up numbers in GF, including the undefeated Cougars.

Get your hand off it coach.....

How did you go Panther ?

[Media Park]

Eags- OOPS! I was bound to stuff up sooner or later... fixed now...

South 15.13.103 def Boston 3.9.27 (76 points)
Tasman 9.18 . 72 def Mallee 10.7.67 (5 points)
Waybacks 8.10.58 def Marbles 6.5.41 (17 points)

[Media Park]

Tipping leaderboard after round 6:

Total, with round 6 in brackets:

DJD 32
MarblePark 30
OL 30
Barksoff 29
KWF 28
Grub 27
Cove 26
Ktime 26
TRR 25
WCP 25
MP 25
Fev 25
Eags 23
Steiger 22
BP 22

Finally got around to this... Could hardly accept my (1)...

And Steigs, you might be tie-ing, but I had to see you off the bottom at least once!!!

[steiger]

Max points. Unchartered territory for me. Well done djd
Forgot to add the question - Are you all scared now ?

[Media Park]

Beer Grade:

Souths 8.7.55 (Steakn approximately 144 disposals) def Boston 7.7.49 (B. Watherston 5)
Tasman 6.2.38 def Mallee 5.7.37
Rangers 2.7.19 def Wayback 2.6.18

If my maths is any good, Souths/Bostons kicked more goals than the other two games combined!

And WCP versus Boof Marshall? Marshall 0 goals... "He's still got it..."

[old fullback]

Beer Grade:

Souths 8.7.55 (Steakn approximately 144 disposals) def Boston 7.7.49 (B. Watherston 5)
Tasman 6.2.38 def Mallee 5.7.37
Rangers 2.7.19 def Wayback 2.6.18

If my maths is any good, Souths/Bostons kicked more goals than the other two games combined!

And WCP versus Boof Marshall? Marshall 0 goals... "He's still got it..."

Dont think your maths is that flash,they only equalled the other two games.

[best on hill]

has anyone read the artical in the sunday mail re: bostons mp incident only a few pages in?

[steiger]

has anyone read the artical in the sunday mail re: bostons mp incident only a few pages in?

Yes best on - but I wonder if it made the City edition ???

[GWW]

I'm in Victor Harbor atm, the article made the SM sold here. Its listed as "Final" edition, whatever that means.

[sherrin22]

I work with a WFC person who has an involvment with the league side and for the treatment they have shown to Rossco I am going to post this

Kelsh, Vogelsanger, Rodd and Harders are not playing tommorow. Ryan Kelly comes in for his first league game and I wish him all the best as he is a top young lad. Lands and Lynch return to the side.

The side is

Kelly, Sara, OLeary
Sampson, Williams, Hunt
Kay, Keatley, Kelson
Rawson, Smith, Lands
Kayser, Cunningham, Osbourne

CraggSapsford, Goodwin, Davison

Cobban, Lynch, Konitzka

How do you like that ?

this is pathetic.
you have 8 positions out of 21 correct. a great advantage to any opposition coach
you named harders an out when neither have played for atleast 4 weeks
you even named Oleary who is injured..
great source!

so in answer to your question, we loved it!

[steakn]

Beer Grade:

Souths 8.7.55 (Steakn approximately 144 disposals) def Boston 7.7.49 (B. Watherston 5)
Tasman 6.2.38 def Mallee 5.7.37
Rangers 2.7.19 def Wayback 2.6.18

If my maths is any good, Souths/Bostons kicked more goals than the other two games combined!

And WCP versus Boof Marshall? Marshall 0 goals... "He's still got it..."

Only a slight exaggeration there MP, also Boof played CHB for the last half and its reasonably hard to get multiple goals from there.

[daicos]

I work with a WFC person who has an involvment with the league side and for the treatment they have shown to Rossco I am going to post this

Kelsh, Vogelsanger, Rodd and Harders are not playing tommorow. Ryan Kelly comes in for his first league game and I wish him all the best as he is a top young lad. Lands and Lynch return to the side.

The side is

Kelly, Sara, OLeary
Sampson, Williams, Hunt
Kay, Keatley, Kelson
Rawson, Smith, Lands
Kayser, Cunningham, Osbourne

CraggSapsford, Goodwin, Davison

Cobban, Lynch, Konitzka

How do you like that ?

this is pathetic.
you have 8 positions out of 21 correct. a great advantage to any opposition coach
you named harders an out when neither have played for atleast 4 weeks
you even named Oleary who is injured..
great source!

so in answer to your question, we loved it!

Glad to be of assistance