by GWW » Sun Jun 06, 2010 9:15 pm
by MST » Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:58 am
by Big Phil » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:16 am
by MST » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:19 am
by on the rails » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:14 pm
MST wrote:In my opinion this game is ideal for Sturt and the fact there were a number of players at yesterday's game says to me the boys are well aware of how big this contest is.
A line has been drawn in the sand and it's now up to the group to come out and hit Norwood with everything they've got.
by Pseudo » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:23 pm
by Squawk » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:24 pm
on the rails wrote:Speaking to a Port Magpies player who was at Propsect on Saturday I can tel you despite whatever spin coaches put on it, he was mightly pissed off that he had to spend, at his coaches direction, his one day off for the weekend watching North vs. South. He was probably even more pissed off at the end of the match having been subjected to one of the worst games of football for many a day!
by on the rails » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:42 pm
Squawk wrote: I know Norwood didn't go to Elizabeth to see Eagles vs Central when they had the bye (despite the fact we played them the following 2 weeks), because many players go home (interstate) or spend time with their families on bye weekends. They even cut back on training on the weekend to give the players that time.
by MST » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:43 pm
on the rails wrote:MST wrote:In my opinion this game is ideal for Sturt and the fact there were a number of players at yesterday's game says to me the boys are well aware of how big this contest is.
A line has been drawn in the sand and it's now up to the group to come out and hit Norwood with everything they've got.
You think the players went along voluntarily???![]()
Speaking to a Port Magpies player who was at Propsect on Saturday I can tel you despite whatever spin coaches put on it, he was mightly pissed off that he had to spend, at his coaches direction, his one day off for the weekend watching North vs. South. He was probably even more pissed off at the end of the match having been subjected to one of the worst games of football for many a day!
by on the rails » Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:49 pm
by MST » Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:07 pm
by smithy » Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:07 pm
MST wrote:The fact there were up to a dozen senior players seen in the stand at The Parade suggests the players are taking some ownership of the situation and were there of their own accord, which I think is a positive thing.
by Inflight » Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:09 pm
Big Phil wrote:Luke Norman and a bunch of about a dozen senior Stut players were sitting up in the stands as interested onlookers at the Parade yesterday.
They would have been impressed with what they saw from their opposition in this game, the Redlegs, and realise they'll be in for a tough one.
by Barto » Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:34 pm
Inflight wrote:Big Phil wrote:Luke Norman and a bunch of about a dozen senior Stut players were sitting up in the stands as interested onlookers at the Parade yesterday.
They would have been impressed with what they saw from their opposition in this game, the Redlegs, and realise they'll be in for a tough one.
Good call Phil but not too many games are won from the grand stand!
by sturtpeter » Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:29 pm
by Inflight » Tue Jun 08, 2010 1:37 pm
Barto wrote:Inflight wrote:Big Phil wrote:Luke Norman and a bunch of about a dozen senior Stut players were sitting up in the stands as interested onlookers at the Parade yesterday.
They would have been impressed with what they saw from their opposition in this game, the Redlegs, and realise they'll be in for a tough one.
Good call Phil but not too many games are won from the grand stand!
They get coached from there regularly.
by CUTTERMAN » Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:50 am
by bulldogproud2 » Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:17 am
by ca » Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:55 am
by Go Legs » Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:05 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |