rod_rooster wrote:Jimmy wrote:hows bens hammy's tho?? or what injury did he have that kept him out?? was it soft tissue....???
Broken arm.
FWIW, thats better football wise than a recurring hammy.
by Jimmy » Tue Dec 19, 2006 1:09 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Jimmy wrote:hows bens hammy's tho?? or what injury did he have that kept him out?? was it soft tissue....???
Broken arm.
by topsywaldron » Tue Dec 19, 2006 3:07 pm
Leaping Lindner wrote:Blue Boy wrote:Wished our champions came back after the AFL !!!
Money talks I guess !!!
Come on BBIt's got nothing to do with $. The guy feels he still has something to offer football wise, and he is North Adelaide through and through. He first played for us as a 16 year old and his old man played for us.
by Blue Boy » Tue Dec 19, 2006 3:27 pm
by BPBRB » Tue Dec 19, 2006 5:41 pm
Blue Boy wrote:This is probably where it is @ as far as dollars go at a guess and is all speculation !!!
I would say his job @ the crows would be good coin & most of his North wage will fall under his coaching requirements. So as far as his playing contract goes it would be fairly small.
I actually dont have a problem with this and a few others could probably learn from this model if they already dont.
by bayman » Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:53 pm
by spell_check » Tue Dec 19, 2006 7:17 pm
bayman wrote:with ben playing on & i think he should, the league should get him to do adds both on tv & more importantly at footy park during afl games with kids watching it & ben telling the kids go & watch your local team play (i prefer state team play) because the kids know ben they dont know tim shaw but lets 'use' ben as a marketing tool etc
by spell_check » Tue Dec 19, 2006 7:19 pm
by redden whites » Tue Dec 19, 2006 7:53 pm
by dash61 » Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:07 pm
BPBRB wrote:Blue Boy wrote:This is probably where it is @ as far as dollars go at a guess and is all speculation !!!
I would say his job @ the crows would be good coin & most of his North wage will fall under his coaching requirements. So as far as his playing contract goes it would be fairly small.
I actually dont have a problem with this and a few others could probably learn from this model if they already dont.
Bingo - bun for Blue Boy.
by Dogwatcher » Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:18 pm
bayman wrote:with ben playing on & i think he should, the league should get him to do adds both on tv & more importantly at footy park during afl games with kids watching it & ben telling the kids go & watch your local team play (i prefer state team play) because the kids know ben they dont know tim shaw but lets 'use' ben as a marketing tool etc
by Blue Boy » Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:21 pm
dash61 wrote:BPBRB wrote:Blue Boy wrote:This is probably where it is @ as far as dollars go at a guess and is all speculation !!!
I would say his job @ the crows would be good coin & most of his North wage will fall under his coaching requirements. So as far as his playing contract goes it would be fairly small.
I actually dont have a problem with this and a few others could probably learn from this model if they already dont.
Bingo - bun for Blue Boy.
Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Maybe Norfs learnt of the Peter Walsh move![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
by Dogwatcher » Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:21 pm
dash61 wrote:BPBRB wrote:Blue Boy wrote:This is probably where it is @ as far as dollars go at a guess and is all speculation !!!
I would say his job @ the crows would be good coin & most of his North wage will fall under his coaching requirements. So as far as his playing contract goes it would be fairly small.
I actually dont have a problem with this and a few others could probably learn from this model if they already dont.
Bingo - bun for Blue Boy.
Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Maybe Norfs learnt of the Peter Walsh move![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
by Blue Boy » Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:25 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:dash61 wrote:BPBRB wrote:Blue Boy wrote:This is probably where it is @ as far as dollars go at a guess and is all speculation !!!
I would say his job @ the crows would be good coin & most of his North wage will fall under his coaching requirements. So as far as his playing contract goes it would be fairly small.
I actually dont have a problem with this and a few others could probably learn from this model if they already dont.
Bingo - bun for Blue Boy.
Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Maybe Norfs learnt of the Peter Walsh move![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Not to say I don't respect Peter Walsh, but to compare him to Ben Hart is a little bit rich.
Hart has a much higher profile than Walsh, most of us have watched him grow up, while Walsh (not his fault) was mostly off our radar when he moved to Melbourne.
He also isn't as highly decorated and his profile has never been as high as Hart's.
I understand the sentiment Dash, but it ain't quite the same.
by sturt1 » Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:28 pm
BPBRB wrote:Dutchy wrote:For a second there I thought Darrell Hart was making a comeback
Hmm a sure way to increase the stress at North if that was the case!
by RoosterMarty » Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:17 pm
sturt1 wrote:BPBRB wrote:Dutchy wrote:For a second there I thought Darrell Hart was making a comeback
Hmm a sure way to increase the stress at North if that was the case!
In fairness I believe he was their last premiership captain.
by Jimmy » Tue Dec 19, 2006 11:17 pm
bayman wrote:with ben playing on & i think he should, the league should get him to do adds both on tv & more importantly at footy park during afl games with kids watching it & ben telling the kids go & watch your local team play (i prefer state team play) because the kids know ben they dont know tim shaw but lets 'use' ben as a marketing tool etc
by Aerie » Wed Dec 20, 2006 12:02 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:dash61 wrote:BPBRB wrote:Blue Boy wrote:This is probably where it is @ as far as dollars go at a guess and is all speculation !!!
I would say his job @ the crows would be good coin & most of his North wage will fall under his coaching requirements. So as far as his playing contract goes it would be fairly small.
I actually dont have a problem with this and a few others could probably learn from this model if they already dont.
Bingo - bun for Blue Boy.
Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Maybe Norfs learnt of the Peter Walsh move![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Not to say I don't respect Peter Walsh, but to compare him to Ben Hart is a little bit rich.
Hart has a much higher profile than Walsh, most of us have watched him grow up, while Walsh (not his fault) was mostly off our radar when he moved to Melbourne.
He also isn't as highly decorated and his profile has never been as high as Hart's.
I understand the sentiment Dash, but it ain't quite the same.
by Dogwatcher » Wed Dec 20, 2006 1:16 pm
by sturt1 » Wed Dec 20, 2006 7:12 pm
by Navy2005 » Fri Dec 22, 2006 2:55 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:dash61 wrote:BPBRB wrote:Blue Boy wrote:This is probably where it is @ as far as dollars go at a guess and is all speculation !!!
I would say his job @ the crows would be good coin & most of his North wage will fall under his coaching requirements. So as far as his playing contract goes it would be fairly small.
I actually dont have a problem with this and a few others could probably learn from this model if they already dont.
Bingo - bun for Blue Boy.
Derrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Maybe Norfs learnt of the Peter Walsh move![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Not to say I don't respect Peter Walsh, but to compare him to Ben Hart is a little bit rich.
Hart has a much higher profile than Walsh, most of us have watched him grow up, while Walsh (not his fault) was mostly off our radar when he moved to Melbourne.
He also isn't as highly decorated and his profile has never been as high as Hart's.
I understand the sentiment Dash, but it ain't quite the same.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |