daicos wrote:I was speaking with a person I know who works with an organization that is involved with the community and the story differs a lot from the one all our boston supporters are posting on here.
Their side of the story is allegedly Hull was antagonising a under17 player and Harry came offer to defend his junior player. When Hull jumper punched Harry a couple of times Harry snapped and layed him out. Allegedly Hull had been quite "vocal" during the game. They did not know anything about Phillip's actions. They stated it was totally out of character for Harry.
I am only posting what I heard so before you have a go at me just realize that thankyou
Can I politely enquire how this changes anything? Hull is 16, no problems even if he was having a crack with another u/17. Jumper punching, happens most weeks in senior footy I'd say. He was vocal, oh my god, that must just send a player right over the egde.
Of course the person from the organisation would definitely be telling it as they saw it, being model citizens and all.
The clincher here folks, is the fact PD was on the wing or closer to Mallee's HBF at the start of the third term. He is a FF and is rarely seen out of the square during a game. This was premeditated designed to shake Harry's tag, conjured up in the change rooms at half time.
Daicos, as much as you are trying to prove otherwise, there was nothing the BFC did wrong, apart from the supporter that obviously would not have occured if a filthy sniper was not laying the boots in.
Right in front of me. RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME!