by overloaded » Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:53 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by steiger » Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:54 pm
daicos wrote:All things need to be looked at not just certain incidents.
by OnSong » Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:57 pm
by overloaded » Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:58 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by tiger08 » Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:00 pm
overloaded wrote:What did ML mean when he said in the paper...
"I think I hurt as a coach on Saturday because I was fairly harsh on my players after the game,"
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
by untapped ability » Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:03 pm
by bantamweight » Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:14 pm
by bluestheboy » Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:46 pm
steiger wrote:MarblePark wrote:Don't want to get myself in deep trouble, but I heard a rumour about Marble Range having a meeting tonight in regards to their match at MP Oval this weekend...
Steiger? LDS? To confirm/deny?
For the record - MRFC have a football operations meeting on the 1st Tuesday of each month and today is the first Tuesday. It has not been called as a result of the events of last Saturday
by overloaded » Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:50 pm
bluestheboy wrote:Obviously didn't see the incident, but the PLFL tribunal has a tendency of leniency. To be honest, it is a hard job given that you need to live in the town and possibly bump into the player any time down the street.
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by Media Park » Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:00 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by tiger08 » Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:06 pm
MarblePark wrote:At least we can now compare every other incident in PL Footy with "Footbrawl."
Thanks Mr Coote!
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
by Media Park » Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:30 pm
tiger08 wrote:MarblePark wrote:At least we can now compare every other incident in PL Footy with "Footbrawl."
Thanks Mr Coote!
now read the editorial were the extravigant front page "footbrawl" becomes a minor "skirmish" and the fence jumper should be nailed to the cross.
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by tiger08 » Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:38 pm
MarblePark wrote:tiger08 wrote:MarblePark wrote:
It doesn't add up, does it?
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
by bluestheboy » Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:39 pm
overloaded wrote:bluestheboy wrote:Obviously didn't see the incident, but the PLFL tribunal has a tendency of leniency. To be honest, it is a hard job given that you need to live in the town and possibly bump into the player any time down the street.
If this is how they actually think btb, they shouldnt be on the tribunal...it defeats its purpose of justice.
by Media Park » Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:48 pm
tiger08 wrote:MarblePark wrote:tiger08 wrote:MarblePark wrote:
It doesn't add up, does it?
course it adds up, it's about selling newspaper's by dramatizing a black(pardon the pun) day in PL footy history and then using a scape goat to back pedal.
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by leonidis » Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:57 pm
by daicos » Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:04 pm
by tiger08 » Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:07 pm
MarblePark wrote:
T08, IMHO they're not 'dramatizing' too much, but I think there's some factual errors, which we've come to expect from the publication.
Hands down the most serious on-field incident in my memory.
I challenge anyone to come up with a worse one...
Media Park wrote:What about my behaviour, tool shiner? 8)
by steiger » Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:09 pm
daicos wrote:I also see the ravendale managers position is in the paper again. If I was 10 years younger I would put in for that as it would be a great opportunity and experience to run a sporting complex. Actually I might look into it further and consider applying, with my experience I would have to be a chance. Does anyone know what the pay rate is like? Who was the previous manager I might give him a call and see the pro's and con's.
by overloaded » Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:11 pm
bluestheboy wrote:If it was a court of criminal law or similar then your statements would hold water but these are well intentioned people giving up their time in the interest of the game.
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |