by valleys07 » Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:01 pm
by Q. » Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:06 pm
valleys07 wrote:Selwood has been ruled out of tomorrow nights match vs. Fremantle.
by Drop Bear » Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:11 pm
valleys07 wrote:Selwood has been ruled out of tomorrow nights match vs. Fremantle.
by valleys07 » Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:13 pm
Drop Bear wrote:Victory for common sense from the Geelong medicos. Not such good news for Supercoach!!
by valleys07 » Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:02 pm
by Rik E Boy » Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:36 pm
by Rik E Boy » Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:37 pm
valleys07 wrote:Drop Bear wrote:Victory for common sense from the Geelong medicos. Not such good news for Supercoach!!
Yep agree, whilst im shattered that a midfield gun for my SC team is out, it would have been foolish to play him
by Gingernuts » Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:38 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:LMAO. Bartel is playing of course.![]()
Why would you choose Selwood over Bartel? Bartel was always underpriced by comparision. Burn those trades boys BURN THOSE TRADES.![]()
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:43 pm
Gingernuts wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:LMAO. Bartel is playing of course.![]()
Why would you choose Selwood over Bartel? Bartel was always underpriced by comparision. Burn those trades boys BURN THOSE TRADES.![]()
regards,
REB
I won't be pulling the trigger. Scored alright without him last week, I'll just bring in the GC boys and roll the dice again. Early days, no need to panic.
by Rik E Boy » Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:46 pm
Quichey wrote:Gefugged REB.
by Q. » Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:03 pm
by White Line Fever » Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:38 pm
Rik E Boy wrote: As for me, I reckon Selwood might take a while to get going and that his low score from round one will now stay in his rolling average for four weeks if you include the match he misses this week.
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:45 pm
White Line Fever wrote:Rik E Boy wrote: As for me, I reckon Selwood might take a while to get going and that his low score from round one will now stay in his rolling average for four weeks if you include the match he misses this week.
regards,
REB
Did you know he was going to get KO'd?
If he didn't he probably would've scored the winning goal NOT Milburn and had 150+ points and we'd all be sitting back patting ourselves on the back for picking him.
He'll be back and better than ever in Round 3.
by Q. » Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:47 pm
by Rik E Boy » Fri Apr 01, 2011 3:10 pm
Quichey wrote:I picked Selwood over Bartel because I had the feeling Selwood would turn himself into a super-premium (ala GAJ & BJ), whereas I felt Bartel would probably still only average about 110PPG.
Oh, and I made a little edit to the thread title for ya REB
by White Line Fever » Fri Apr 01, 2011 3:17 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:White Line Fever wrote:Rik E Boy wrote: As for me, I reckon Selwood might take a while to get going and that his low score from round one will now stay in his rolling average for four weeks if you include the match he misses this week.
regards,
REB
Did you know he was going to get KO'd?
If he didn't he probably would've scored the winning goal NOT Milburn and had 150+ points and we'd all be sitting back patting ourselves on the back for picking him.
He'll be back and better than ever in Round 3.
Of course not. Do you know he'll be back and better than ever in Round 3. No. And no point using the If word. You can deal with 'if' I'll deal with what is......Bartel underpriced, Selwood not.
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Fri Apr 01, 2011 3:52 pm
by Q. » Fri Apr 01, 2011 4:10 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |