
by CoverKing » Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:39 pm
by Rik E Boy » Mon Apr 04, 2011 4:13 pm
CoverKing wrote:and here i come
by BenchedEagle » Mon Apr 04, 2011 4:16 pm
by CoverKing » Mon Apr 04, 2011 7:01 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:CoverKing wrote:and here i come
See you next CK. Bit of a grudge match after the mud we sling at each other. Pretty important clash too. I reckon whoever loses can kiss top four goodbye....after Round 3! How rude is that!
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:03 pm
by BenchedEagle » Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:36 am
by Rik E Boy » Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:51 pm
by Q. » Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:06 pm
by CoverKing » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:46 am
by Q. » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:48 am
CoverKing wrote:Dusty tunnels 291 v rebcats bartel and grimes!
I would be bloody unlucky to lose this!
by CoverKing » Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:51 am
Quichey wrote:CoverKing wrote:Dusty tunnels 291 v rebcats bartel and grimes!
I would be bloody unlucky to lose this!
Can see Bartel having a huuuuuge game and Grimesy is capable of 120-130. Nervous Sunday awaits you two...
by Rik E Boy » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:00 am
CoverKing wrote:Quichey wrote:CoverKing wrote:Dusty tunnels 291 v rebcats bartel and grimes!
I would be bloody unlucky to lose this!
Can see Bartel having a huuuuuge game and Grimesy is capable of 120-130. Nervous Sunday awaits you two...
I would still be unlucky to lose. 146 needed from both players is a huge huge ask
by CoverKing » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:11 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:CoverKing wrote:Quichey wrote:CoverKing wrote:Dusty tunnels 291 v rebcats bartel and grimes!
I would be bloody unlucky to lose this!
Can see Bartel having a huuuuuge game and Grimesy is capable of 120-130. Nervous Sunday awaits you two...
I would still be unlucky to lose. 146 needed from both players is a huge huge ask
Nah mate I'm gone. Goodes vs. ROK sunk me last night and you got tons from Jack and Foley. You deserve to win this one. I was struggling as soon as Cyril got rubbed out and my point chasing efforts appear to have been in vain. While many coaches are scoring less this week you have maintained your start so not much luck for me there.
There will be much head scratcing at REBCat park over the next few weeks.![]()
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:43 pm
CoverKing wrote:You only just got rid of yarran and jack, I'm pretty sure you had jack? Why you get rid of him mate. I understand yarran as I did the samebut the money was too good to refuse
by Q. » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:44 pm
by Q. » Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:48 pm
by Gingernuts » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:15 pm
by Q. » Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:00 pm
Gingernuts wrote:I'll be ******. I just beat Hondo.
by Hondo » Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:16 pm
by Q. » Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:17 pm
Hondo wrote:Well played Ginger
Stupidly in hindsight I put Yarran on the bench and let 61 points go by playing Tapscott on field for 50.
That said, you have a very good side and a much better midfield bench than mine. I really think ignoring Curnow was stubbornly wrong in hindsight.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |