by Dogwatcher » Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:24 am
by MatteeG » Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:28 am
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by rod_rooster » Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:43 am
Dogwatcher wrote:Soooo....who's going to replace Watson, who was going to replace Symonds.
by Dogwatcher » Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:00 pm
by catchisthecry » Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:06 pm
by catchisthecry » Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:11 pm
by catchisthecry » Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:12 pm
by rod_rooster » Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:37 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Does that mean we're giving up on the obsession of having an allrounder?
by NFC » Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:57 pm
by Media Park » Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:09 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by magpie in the 80's » Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:19 pm
by Psyber » Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:05 pm
I tend to agree with that - perhaps coming in earlier may encourage greater self discipline - after a few boo-boos...FlyingHigh wrote:While I don't think Clarke should be dropped, your point is valid Pysber. Three of the last four innings he has given his wicket away whilst on top of the bowling. It is the same sort of thing he got dropped for a couple of years ago, and to see it hasn't been eradicated is a cause for concern when he really should be maturing.
FWIW I think the batting order would be better with him at 4 and Hussey at 5.
by FD88 » Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:12 pm
by RoosterMarty » Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:12 pm
by panther » Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:13 pm
panther wrote:Im going to name the teams on form and fitness only and who deserves a spot.
australia
1 katich
2
3 ponting
4 hussey
5 clarke
6
7 haddin
8
9 johnson
10
11
south africa
1 smith
2
3 amla
4 kallis
5 devilliers
6 duminy
7 boucher
8
9 harris
10 steyn
11 ntini
Looking at the shoe ins for Australia one can only say that the batting is still very good, a very good keeper batsman, but an attack that is lacking penetration with the older ball.
Stuart Clark is missed
South Africa are a better team because they select 5 frontline bowlers, Australia need Clark and Watson in the team[or symonds fit enough to bowl] to have more depth.
Australia also needs a tall bowler who gets bounce and can bowl long spells with the old ball and if he was younger that could have been Dorey
Australia before the second test in melbourne in the last 7 tests against the second and third ranked teams [ south africa and india ] have not won a test match, thats the last 6 tests v India and 1 against south africa.
by hearts on fire » Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:15 pm
panther wrote:Im going to name the teams on form and fitness only and who deserves a spot.
australia
1 katich
2
3 ponting
4 hussey
5 clarke
6
7 haddin
8
9 johnson
10
11
south africa
1 smith
2
3 amla
4 kallis
5 devilliers
6 duminy
7 boucher
8
9 harris
10 steyn
11 ntini
Looking at the shoe ins for Australia one can only say that the batting is still very good, a very good keeper batsman, but an attack that is lacking penetration with the older ball.
Stuart Clark is missed
South Africa are a better team because they select 5 frontline bowlers, Australia need Clark and Watson in the team[or symonds fit enough to bowl] to have more depth.
Australia also needs a tall bowler who gets bounce and can bowl long spells with the old ball and if he was younger that could have been Dorey
Australia before the second test in melbourne in the last 7 tests against the second and third ranked teams [ south africa and india ] have not won a test match, thats the last 6 tests v India and 1 against south africa.
by FD88 » Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:16 pm
by RoosterMarty » Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:17 pm
FD88 wrote:Would be interested to know what people's thoughts on McDonald are
by Dogwatcher » Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:17 pm
magpie in the 80's wrote:THE Australian cricket selectors have called up NSW paceman Doug Bollinger and Victorian all-rounder Andrew McDonald.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |