by Squawk » Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:50 pm
by stampy » Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:50 pm
spell_check wrote:stampy wrote:i reckon those 2 should umpire the last test...............cant do any worse than rudi, thats for sure
But how do they move from the striker to non-striker positions?
by stampy » Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:51 pm
Squawk wrote:Gotta say I enjoy Warnie's commentary - you can just imagine that what he says in the commentary box is what he would be saying on the field. Other commentators definitely seem to commentate with the benefit of the TV coverage whereas Warnie seems to watch the game as though he is playing the game and not spectating.
by wycbloods » Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:52 pm
by wycbloods » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:01 am
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:06 am
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:07 am
Squawk wrote:Gotta say I enjoy Warnie's commentary - you can just imagine that what he says in the commentary box is what he would be saying on the field. Other commentators definitely seem to commentate with the benefit of the TV coverage whereas Warnie seems to watch the game as though he is playing the game and not spectating.
by wycbloods » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:08 am
by wycbloods » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:09 am
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Squawk wrote:Gotta say I enjoy Warnie's commentary - you can just imagine that what he says in the commentary box is what he would be saying on the field. Other commentators definitely seem to commentate with the benefit of the TV coverage whereas Warnie seems to watch the game as though he is playing the game and not spectating.
Warnie has proven to me what I always suspected. He is a very astute judge of cricket, and he has been great to listen to. No doubt would have made a great captain.
by Pottsy » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:12 am
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Warnie has proven to me what I always suspected. He is a very astute judge of cricket, and he has been great to listen to. No doubt would have made a great captain.
by dedja » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:13 am
wycbloods wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:Squawk wrote:Gotta say I enjoy Warnie's commentary - you can just imagine that what he says in the commentary box is what he would be saying on the field. Other commentators definitely seem to commentate with the benefit of the TV coverage whereas Warnie seems to watch the game as though he is playing the game and not spectating.
Warnie has proven to me what I always suspected. He is a very astute judge of cricket, and he has been great to listen to. No doubt would have made a great captain.
If he could've fitted the mould off the field he probably would've been skipper at some stage. His knowledge of the game is superb.
by Squawk » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:22 am
by rod_rooster » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:23 am
dedja wrote:wycbloods wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:Squawk wrote:Gotta say I enjoy Warnie's commentary - you can just imagine that what he says in the commentary box is what he would be saying on the field. Other commentators definitely seem to commentate with the benefit of the TV coverage whereas Warnie seems to watch the game as though he is playing the game and not spectating.
Warnie has proven to me what I always suspected. He is a very astute judge of cricket, and he has been great to listen to. No doubt would have made a great captain.
If he could've fitted the mould off the field he probably would've been skipper at some stage. His knowledge of the game is superb.
What ... infidelity, chain smoking, hookers, texting other's wives, pizzas and Indian SP bookie mates not what the selectors wanted off the field?
by rod_rooster » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:23 am
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Squawk wrote:Gotta say I enjoy Warnie's commentary - you can just imagine that what he says in the commentary box is what he would be saying on the field. Other commentators definitely seem to commentate with the benefit of the TV coverage whereas Warnie seems to watch the game as though he is playing the game and not spectating.
Warnie has proven to me what I always suspected. He is a very astute judge of cricket, and he has been great to listen to. No doubt would have made a great captain.
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:24 am
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:26 am
Squawk wrote:Its interesting to listen to those who have played with him in the IPL - many of the young Indian cricketers and even other internationals have all had nothing but praise for his captaincy in the IPL, saying how much they have learnt from him in that format.
by dedja » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:26 am
by wycbloods » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:26 am
dedja wrote:wycbloods wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:Squawk wrote:Gotta say I enjoy Warnie's commentary - you can just imagine that what he says in the commentary box is what he would be saying on the field. Other commentators definitely seem to commentate with the benefit of the TV coverage whereas Warnie seems to watch the game as though he is playing the game and not spectating.
Warnie has proven to me what I always suspected. He is a very astute judge of cricket, and he has been great to listen to. No doubt would have made a great captain.
If he could've fitted the mould off the field he probably would've been skipper at some stage. His knowledge of the game is superb.
What ... infidelity, chain smoking, hookers, texting other's wives, pizzas and Indian SP bookie mates not what the selectors wanted off the field?
by Squawk » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:27 am
Pottsy wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:I wish he could have been a skipper, we would have had a more imaginative brand of captaincy than the Waugh/Ponting era.
by dedja » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:27 am
rod_rooster wrote:FFS are you 60 Minutes?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |