by mal » Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:00 pm
by RoosterMarty » Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:13 pm
by mal » Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:22 pm
by Rik E Boy » Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:31 pm
RoosterMarty wrote:Haddin is a very good player but he can be a twat times. If it isn't a ridiculous appeal he takes hours to get ready to face the next delivery! He should also just leave those wide deliveries.
by mal » Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:45 pm
by cripple » Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:04 pm
by RoosterMarty » Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:09 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:RoosterMarty wrote:Haddin is a very good player but he can be a twat times. If it isn't a ridiculous appeal he takes hours to get ready to face the next delivery! He should also just leave those wide deliveries.
Anyone would think he was trying to play for a draw.
regards,
REB
by MAY-Z » Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:11 pm
mal wrote:I give up
AU 5/211
HADDIN 20*
CLARKE 61 *
5 overs
30 legitimate deliveries to go
On a 5th day pitch
and Gayle calls the game off
As a past captain of a cricket club, I would never ever concede a game
Believe it or not , sides have lost 5 wickets within 30 balls from primary school games to Test cricket
by mal » Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:32 pm
by Booney » Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:36 pm
wycbloods wrote:16 overs left in the day and the windies need 5 wickets. it will be a draw and there will be no Shane Warne miracle to make Les Burdett look good.
by RoosterMarty » Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:53 pm
Booney wrote:wycbloods wrote:16 overs left in the day and the windies need 5 wickets. it will be a draw and there will be no Shane Warne miracle to make Les Burdett look good.
Bit harsh, with only two hours left in a 5 day match it was still game on. Better than a 3 day result on a stinker every day.
by Adelaide Hawk » Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:04 pm
RoosterMarty wrote:Booney wrote:wycbloods wrote:16 overs left in the day and the windies need 5 wickets. it will be a draw and there will be no Shane Warne miracle to make Les Burdett look good.
Bit harsh, with only two hours left in a 5 day match it was still game on. Better than a 3 day result on a stinker every day.
It could have been a different story if the aussies were facing a better bowling attack... also I thought the aussies could have done a bit more to force the result. The runs were very gettable.
by smithy » Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:28 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Neither side can win if Hussey doesn't get out. Dead set spud.
regards,
REB
by jackpot jim » Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:34 pm
MAY-Z wrote: once again adelaide has been dealt up a terrible cricket wicket which gave the bowlers nothing on any day. good for batting but that was it. i cant remebe rthe last time we had a wicket at adelaide that gave the bowlers any encouragement at all - no wonder our state bowlers struggle
by jackpot jim » Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:39 pm
silicone skyline wrote:mal wrote:BETFAIR odds tea
AU $27
WI $22
$1-07
I would rather back WI instead of AU at those odds
The draw is the right odds
TAB odds, what a joke
Result 2nd Test Aust v WI Res LIVE
Select the winner or a draw
No. Description Win
22830
Draw
$1.08
22831
West Indies
$12.00
22829
Australia
$13.0
by Stumps » Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:52 pm
MAY-Z wrote:mal wrote:I give up
AU 5/211
HADDIN 20*
CLARKE 61 *
5 overs
30 legitimate deliveries to go
On a 5th day pitch
and Gayle calls the game off
As a past captain of a cricket club, I would never ever concede a game
Believe it or not , sides have lost 5 wickets within 30 balls from primary school games to Test cricket
the five wickets were never going to fall why waste everyones time for another 20 minutes - why mention it was a 5th day pitch? once again adelaide has been dealt up a terrible cricket wicket which gave the bowlers nothing on any day. good for batting but that was it. i cant remebe rthe last time we had a wicket at adelaide that gave the bowlers any encouragement at all - no wonder our state bowlers struggle
i was dissapointed that australia were never looking to win the game 4 an over was very achievable against an inexperienced attack on a good deck.
by jackpot jim » Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:22 pm
Stumps wrote:MAY-Z wrote:mal wrote:I give up
AU 5/211
HADDIN 20*
CLARKE 61 *
5 overs
30 legitimate deliveries to go
On a 5th day pitch
and Gayle calls the game off
As a past captain of a cricket club, I would never ever concede a game
Believe it or not , sides have lost 5 wickets within 30 balls from primary school games to Test cricket
the five wickets were never going to fall why waste everyones time for another 20 minutes - why mention it was a 5th day pitch? once again adelaide has been dealt up a terrible cricket wicket which gave the bowlers nothing on any day. good for batting but that was it. i cant remebe rthe last time we had a wicket at adelaide that gave the bowlers any encouragement at all - no wonder our state bowlers struggle
i was dissapointed that australia were never looking to win the game 4 an over was very achievable against an inexperienced attack on a good deck.
When you have played nearly 30 hours of cricket, what is another 20 minutes. Cannot believe any international captain would call off a game until there is less balls left than wickets remaining...
by Hondo » Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:31 pm
by mal » Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:45 pm
by Dogwatcher » Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:14 am
mal wrote: I reckon a guy called Hugh Trumble took 4 wickets in 4 balls once in Test cricket ?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |