Monkey Business

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Re: Monkey Business

Postby stampy » Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:58 pm

he he nice one taz
Go The Tiges!!!
stampy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9020
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:21 pm
Location: at church asking for divine intervention
Has liked: 75 times
Been liked: 364 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach

Re: Monkey Business

Postby brod » Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:12 am

My biggest concern in this matter is the lack of evidence to back up the charge - It is nothing but heresay and the word of one group of people (Australians) against that of another (Indians). It is your word against mine and that such a harsh penalty has been handed down on the basis of such evidence does not sit well with me. To my recolection Singh has no previous record (if he does it was seven years ago) and as such the penalty does not fit this situation. I will add that that the penalty fits the CRIME, but with the available evidence the crime cannot be conclusively proved wihout doubt.
User avatar
brod
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19193
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: Willaston
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 27 times

Re: Monkey Business

Postby Punk Rooster » Tue Jan 08, 2008 9:35 am

When the Indians name their next Test Squad, will the press call them "12 Monkeys"?
They shouldn't be offended by that..
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: Monkey Business

Postby locky801 » Tue Jan 08, 2008 10:44 am

brod wrote:My biggest concern in this matter is the lack of evidence to back up the charge - It is nothing but heresay and the word of one group of people (Australians) against that of another (Indians). It is your word against mine and that such a harsh penalty has been handed down on the basis of such evidence does not sit well with me. To my recolection Singh has no previous record (if he does it was seven years ago) and as such the penalty does not fit this situation. I will add that that the penalty fits the CRIME, but with the available evidence the crime cannot be conclusively proved wihout doubt.



Unfortunately with the ICC it does not have to be proven beyond reasonable doubt, my understanding is that it only has to be proven on the balance of probabilities, if this is the case I cannot see how they could believe one player or the other, obviously there is some other evidence or something else has come to light to back the charge
Life is about moments, Create them
User avatar
locky801
Coach
 
Posts: 58661
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 5:11 pm
Location: working all around Australia and loving it
Has liked: 4394 times
Been liked: 1419 times

Re: Monkey Business

Postby rod_rooster » Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:55 pm

Mike Proctor has stated that he is satisfied that the "Monkey" remark was made beyond reasonable doubt.
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Monkey Business

Postby Mic » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:00 pm

If India leave then Aus could say the monkey is off their back....
User avatar
Mic
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3125
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 3:17 pm
Has liked: 170 times
Been liked: 154 times

Re: Monkey Business

Postby Cambridge Clarrie » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:34 pm

Andy #24 wrote:Have the Aussies bitten off more than they can chew with the racism allegations. It seems evident that the Australian team has made offensive remarks to other teams but cries foul when it happens to them. I understand that there is no place for racism but it is not the only way to overstep the mark. We should be prepared to temper our own behaviour now as we can't just pick and choose what we think unnacceptabley offensive.

3 matches is a bit harsh. Does anyone believe the kid is racist? He was probably overwhelmed and retorted to Symonds with the first thing he knew could piss him off. This kind of punishment will not change any underlying beliefs that spawn racism, nor is there any need for a deterrent. I can't see these kind of remarks becoming prevelant and the offenders claiming a precedent of an absence of punishment.

Show some maturity boys, shake hands and get over it.


I'm with you Andy.

I love the fact that the Aussies find it acceptable to bag opponents in so many different ways but then become oh so precious when one of their own is allegedly called a 'monkey'. Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.

I've thought the Aussies have become unbearably arrogant since Steve Waugh retired and Ponting became captain. Ponting - great batsman, terrible example as a captain.
"They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head"
User avatar
Cambridge Clarrie
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1702
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Asleep in the Unley Oval pirate ship...
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 31 times

Re: Monkey Business

Postby Dogwatcher » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:45 pm

Cambridge Clarrie wrote: Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.



No?

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0707-22.htm

Henry's campaign has resonance because Le Pen does not have the market cornered on racism in the sport. So-called fans, throwing banana peels and peanuts at star players of African descent, have plagued European soccer this past season. For much of the World Cup, such assaults did not occur. But before the June 27th game against Spain, the French coach, Raymond Domenech, said Spanish fans were "making monkey chants" as the French team left their bus. The incident evoked memories of an outrageous racist diatribe against Thierry Henry delivered by Spanish coach Luis Aragones to "inspire" his team before a match against France a couple years ago. When Franch defeated Spain last week, it was more just desserts for Aragones and another bitter pill for Le Pen.


Black goalie Weekes has banana thrown at him
May 9, 2002 -- SportsLine.com wire reports
http://www.sportsline.com/u/ce/multi/0, ... 60,00.html

MONTREAL -- Two nights after a fan threw a banana at Carolina Hurricanes goalie Kevin Weekes, the Montreal Canadiens said Molson Centre security guards have been asked to watch for racist behavior.

The banana was thrown onto the ice as the players went to the dressing room after Montreal's 2-1 overtime victory Tuesday night in Game 3 of the best-of-7 Stanley Cup playoff series.

Neither Weekes, who is black, nor Carolina coach Paul Maurice would comment Thursday before Game 4.

Canadiens spokesman Donald Beauchamp said in a statement the team "does not tolerate such behavior and if members of our security staff witness such actions, they will react promptly."

The Raleigh News-Observer reported that Carolina defenseman Aaron Ward pointed out the banana to linesman Ray Scapinello. Ward also declined comment.

"We brought it to the attention of the league, but Kevin just wants to let it go, so we're willing to do that," Hurricanes general manager Jim Rutherford told the News-Observer. "We don't hold the Canadiens responsible for the behavior of a fan."

A capacity crowd of 21,273 attended the game.

Banana throwing and other racist acts aimed at black players have been reported at European soccer matches in the past, but it is the first such incident reported at the Molson Centre. Similar acts have been reported at junior hockey games in Canada.


AP NEWS
The Associated Press News Service
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Monkey Business

Postby Punk Rooster » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:47 pm

Cambridge Clarrie wrote:I love the fact that the Aussies find it acceptable to bag opponents in so many different ways but then become oh so precious when one of their own is allegedly called a 'monkey'. Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.

What is it with Sturt supporters?
Andrew Symonds objected to a racist taunt.
This taunt is not acceptable in the EPL, why should it be acceptable in Test Cricket?
The Aussies are masters of sledging, because they know there is a fine line, & they don't cross it.
Indians however are backwards when it comes to sledging, & they tried to take the Aussies on & lost- so they retort to racism.
Funnily enough, racism is definately not in the spirit of cricket, eh Anil?...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: Monkey Business

Postby Blue Boy » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:59 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:I love the fact that the Aussies find it acceptable to bag opponents in so many different ways but then become oh so precious when one of their own is allegedly called a 'monkey'. Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.

What is it with Sturt supporters?



Punky please watch your genarlization :wink:
It is what it is !!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Monkey Business

Postby purch » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:59 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:I love the fact that the Aussies find it acceptable to bag opponents in so many different ways but then become oh so precious when one of their own is allegedly called a 'monkey'. Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.

What is it with Sturt supporters?
Andrew Symonds objected to a racist taunt.
This taunt is not acceptable in the EPL, why should it be acceptable in Test Cricket?
The Aussies are masters of sledging, because they know there is a fine line, & they don't cross it.
Indians however are backwards when it comes to sledging, & they tried to take the Aussies on & lost- so they retort to racism.
Funnily enough, racism is definately not in the spirit of cricket, eh Anil?...


LOL. You must have good ears!
And your name suggests you are a...

cock :wink:
"And look at John Halbert"
" His whiskers have curled."
User avatar
purch
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1351
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 10:39 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Monkey Business

Postby smac » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:04 pm

Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.

That's because (I am assuming here) you are a caucasian Clarrie.

I said in a previous post (can't remember which thread, might be time to merge some of these) that it is difficult to understand, being a white man in a white mans country. You have just proved that point a little further.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Monkey Business

Postby purch » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:12 pm

smac wrote:
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.

That's because (I am assuming here) you are a caucasian Clarrie.

I said in a previous post (can't remember which thread, might be time to merge some of these) that it is difficult to understand, being a white man in a white mans country. You have just proved that point a little further.


What on earth are you suggesting smac? That dark skinned people look more like a monkey than caucasian people???
Now, really...when was the last time you saw a monkey?
"And look at John Halbert"
" His whiskers have curled."
User avatar
purch
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1351
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 10:39 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Monkey Business

Postby Dogwatcher » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:15 pm

Purch - if you read the articles I've provided above, you'll understand why black sportspeople don't like being referred to as monkeys. It has serious connotations.
After the hullabaloo in India, Harbajhan would have been aware that 'monkey' is considered a racist term.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Monkey Business

Postby am Bays » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:19 pm

It seems Brad Hogg will have to front an ICC disciplinary committee for allegedly calling the Indians "Bastards"

Reminds me of the alleged comment Bill Woodfull is meant to have said, when confronted by an angry Jardine complaining that he had been called a "bastard" by one of the Australian players,

Woodfull is alleged to have turned to the Australian dressing room and asked,

"which one of you bastards called this bastard a bastard?"

I understand that story is acrophyal because reports from players of the day is that Bill Woodfull, a school principal, had a much more polite command of the English language.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19615
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2082 times

Re: Monkey Business

Postby sasquatch » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:29 pm

purch wrote:
smac wrote:
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.

That's because (I am assuming here) you are a caucasian Clarrie.

I said in a previous post (can't remember which thread, might be time to merge some of these) that it is difficult to understand, being a white man in a white mans country. You have just proved that point a little further.


What on earth are you suggesting smac? That dark skinned people look more like a monkey than caucasian people???
Now, really...when was the last time you saw a monkey?


The term 'monkey,' in my opinion, is offensive, as we (all humans) are considered to be descended from the apes (monkeys), and being a 'monkey' would mean you are less developed than other humans.
So offensive and insulting, yes.
SAS's goal tally- 0
WCP's goal tally- 0
User avatar
sasquatch
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 523
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 3:48 pm
Location: The Great Northern Hotel.
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Monkey Business

Postby rod_rooster » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:29 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:It seems Brad Hogg will have to front an ICC disciplinary committee for allegedly calling the Indians "Bastards"

Reminds me of the alleged comment Bill Woodfull is meant to have said, when confronted by an angry Jardine complaining that he had been called a "bastard" by one of the Australian players,

Woodfull is alleged to have turned to the Australian dressing room and asked,

"which one of you bastards called this bastard a bastard?"

I understand that story is acrophyal because reports from players of the day is that Bill Woodfull, a school principal, had a much more polite command of the English language.


:lol: :lol: That's gold :lol: :lol:
rod_rooster
Coach
 
Posts: 6595
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Monkey Business

Postby smac » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:32 pm

purch wrote:
smac wrote:
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Calling someone a monkey hardly constitutes racism to me.

That's because (I am assuming here) you are a caucasian Clarrie.

I said in a previous post (can't remember which thread, might be time to merge some of these) that it is difficult to understand, being a white man in a white mans country. You have just proved that point a little further.


What on earth are you suggesting smac? That dark skinned people look more like a monkey than caucasian people???
Now, really...when was the last time you saw a monkey?

I was merely suggesting that a white man, in a white country, will struggle to understand racism fully.

Now, really...when was the last time something was easier to understand?
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Monkey Business

Postby Dogwatcher » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:38 pm

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:It seems Brad Hogg will have to front an ICC disciplinary committee for allegedly calling the Indians "Bastards"


Tit for tat.
How can the Indians try and make an opposing player front a tribunal which they obviously have no respect for? Seems hypocritical.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Monkey Business

Postby smac » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:39 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:It seems Brad Hogg will have to front an ICC disciplinary committee for allegedly calling the Indians "Bastards"


Tit for tat.
How can the Indians try and make an opposing player front a tribunal which they obviously have no respect for? Seems hypocritical.

Typical of the whole debacle - one issue at a time please. Get the 'monkey business' out of the way, then deal with the next issue.

This stupid finger pointing cr@p will improve the situation and relations between the 2 teams won't it?
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

PreviousNext

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |