by Pup » Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:07 pm
by Stumps » Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:12 pm
locky801 wrote:well 234 to win, should have been less, why did Cleary not bowl out his 10, Boof gets one final over which costs 20, surely but I maybe wrong that Cleary is a better bowler than Boof, oh well, up to the batsman now, is a very gettable target with our stars in the lower order
by mal » Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:33 pm
by RustyCage » Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:51 pm
by heater31 » Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:56 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Can anyone tell me why the hell Adcock had Boof on the boundary straight down the ground today? Adcocks captaincy today left me shaking my head, NSW should have made 35 runs less than they did.
The Delmont/Manout - katich non run out was comical.
by mal » Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:19 pm
by Hondo » Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:24 pm
by Brucetiki » Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:40 pm
by mal » Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:43 pm
Brucetiki wrote:How bad are NSW then if we can beat them?
by jackpot jim » Wed Nov 07, 2007 11:15 pm
mal wrote:I thought overall ADCOCK captained well
What he needs to do is make some runs
by Grahaml » Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:17 am
by another grub » Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:35 am
by blink » Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:43 am
another grub wrote:What a complete joke that was!
If Dalmont is the best young bat we have we are going to strugle for a lot of years..... did he back NSW?
Just goes to show why the redbacks are a disgrace to SA.... Elliot should have made Sweet FA....
in 1 word.....
PATHETIC
by Hondo » Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:45 am
Grahaml wrote:Lehmann would have been straight because his lack of speed across the ground would be better used there where he can take his time, rather than square where 2 metres can mean the difference between 1 and 4. Luckily Adcock understands these things better than you do.
by locky801 » Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:58 am
by Killa » Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:58 am
by Killa » Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:00 am
by rod_rooster » Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:10 am
hondo71 wrote:Grahaml wrote:Lehmann would have been straight because his lack of speed across the ground would be better used there where he can take his time, rather than square where 2 metres can mean the difference between 1 and 4. Luckily Adcock understands these things better than you do.
Nah ..... come on GrahamL it HAS to be something to do with Adcock
You know the rules:
1 If we win its despite Adcock = Adcock has to go
2 If we lose its because of Adcock = Adcock has to go
![]()
I say again, thank god there's some sensible posting going on in these SA Cricket threads to balance things out ....
by mal » Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:50 pm
Killa wrote:Adcock cost SA at least 15 runs by bowling lehmann, his last over should have been a quicker bowler.
by Hondo » Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:36 pm
rod_rooster wrote:So you think Adcock is worthy of a spot in the side hondo? With his stellar form this season how could you leave him outAt least when Mark Taylor was kept in the Australian side despite not being able to make a run, he had some previous form and performance that suggested he was capapble of making runs. What does Adcock have?
1047 runs in 24 first class matches at an average of 24. This all over a ten year period. Speaks volumes for the ability of the guy to just simply not be good enough for first class cricket.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |