One Eyed wrote:around the 300 mark
Per quarter
by Johnny Bowla » Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:22 am
One Eyed wrote:around the 300 mark
by One Eyed » Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:32 am
by Counter Punching » Thu Oct 22, 2009 11:44 am
by SomeOleFart » Thu Oct 22, 2009 2:35 pm
by Dogwatcher » Thu Oct 22, 2009 2:41 pm
by SomeOleFart » Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:15 pm
by Dogwatcher » Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:56 pm
by SomeOleFart » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:06 am
andrew_veniamin wrote:end of the day Renmark were the best side this year and they won get over it nothings going to change!
by Bum Crack » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:07 am
SomeOleFart wrote:andrew_veniamin wrote:end of the day Renmark were the best side this year and they won get over it nothings going to change!
I am not disputing Renmark didn't deserve the Win and good luck to them. The point is ..... have our league got the balls to act if it is correct that there was an uncleared player playing.
If it is correct Loxton F.C. should not go without some sort of penalty
by silicone skyline » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:10 am
Bum Crack wrote:SomeOleFart wrote:andrew_veniamin wrote:end of the day Renmark were the best side this year and they won get over it nothings going to change!
I am not disputing Renmark didn't deserve the Win and good luck to them. The point is ..... have our league got the balls to act if it is correct that there was an uncleared player playing.
If it is correct Loxton F.C. should not go without some sort of penalty
who was the player?
by Bum Crack » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:11 am
silicone skyline wrote:Bum Crack wrote:SomeOleFart wrote:andrew_veniamin wrote:end of the day Renmark were the best side this year and they won get over it nothings going to change!
I am not disputing Renmark didn't deserve the Win and good luck to them. The point is ..... have our league got the balls to act if it is correct that there was an uncleared player playing.
If it is correct Loxton F.C. should not go without some sort of penalty
who was the player?
Talked to some Loxton players last night. Denied it profusely and claimed they are always the victims of these vicious rumours. lol
by skeletal system » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:22 am
by silicone skyline » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:23 am
skeletal system wrote:I was told this about a month ago and i believe there is an investigation going on from the SANFL. Apparentky it was the fella with the half rats tail sought of hair do that played across the half back line i think?
No idea what his name is but rumour has it that he came back from Adelaide to play back at Loxton and was not cleared from that club, i think Loxton didn't think they had to?
like i said this is what is what i have been told and may not be 100% correct so don't sue me!!
by silicone skyline » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:25 am
by skeletal system » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:25 am
by silicone skyline » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:26 am
by silicone skyline » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:26 am
skeletal system wrote:You are a man of knowledge SS, it even looks like you spelt it right?
by silicone skyline » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:28 am
by skeletal system » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:29 am
by silicone skyline » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:30 am
skeletal system wrote:What is happening at Loxton North? It is leaving it pretty late to name a coach going into the very important time of recruiting players even if it is targeting ex local ones!
Any names mentioned and perhaps they have made a mistake focussing on attracting a player coach which was a pretty clear message when you read the advertisement they put in the paper?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |