by From The Outer » Mon May 16, 2011 3:46 pm
by Goldberg » Mon May 16, 2011 3:54 pm
by From The Outer » Mon May 16, 2011 4:07 pm
by From The Outer » Mon May 16, 2011 9:59 pm
by biffboy » Mon May 16, 2011 10:06 pm
From The Outer wrote:Rumour in the Bridge is that the Chooks are looking at taking the Joel Kay incident further.
by Goldberg » Tue May 17, 2011 12:15 pm
carey wrote:GWW wrote:I take your point its a tough gig FTO, I've tried to be as diplomatic as I could. Anyway its the last comment I'll make on the subject of umpiring in the RMFL.
we had 2 RMFL umpires in our league (mallee) this week and they were by far the best umpires i've seen in our league since i've been involved out here.
1 was imp's old coach and the other was a ruckmen that has won a couple of medals not sure of his name.
by slug » Tue May 17, 2011 4:28 pm
carey wrote:GWW wrote:I take your point its a tough gig FTO, I've tried to be as diplomatic as I could. Anyway its the last comment I'll make on the subject of umpiring in the RMFL.
we had 2 RMFL umpires in our league (mallee) this week and they were by far the best umpires i've seen in our league since i've been involved out here.
1 was imp's old coach and the other was a ruckmen that has won a couple of medals not sure of his name.
by GWW » Tue May 17, 2011 4:54 pm
by teaoby » Wed May 18, 2011 10:19 am
biffboy wrote:From The Outer wrote:Rumour in the Bridge is that the Chooks are looking at taking the Joel Kay incident further.
Wouldnt be surprised, was pretty rough what happened
by GWW » Wed May 18, 2011 10:58 am
by Goldberg » Wed May 18, 2011 11:25 am
by biffboy » Wed May 18, 2011 11:39 am
Goldberg wrote:I didn't really want to comment on this but then thought, I would if it was just an average player who had done the same thing so:
Weak as P!ss from a bloke who many young kids at the ground would have been very keen to watch play. If you come with big reputations, & on as he put it in the Sunday mail Big money or "where the money is", then u have an obligation to behave in a responsible manner. To elbow a bloke 40 meters off the footy, hard enough to break his jaw, or even in the region of the head at any level of intention is an absolute disgrace
by Goldberg » Wed May 18, 2011 11:58 am
Goldberg wrote:I didn't really want to comment on this but then thought, I would if it was just an average player who had done the same thing so:
Weak as P!ss from a bloke who many young kids at the ground would have been very keen to watch play. If you come with big reputations, & on as he put it in the Sunday mail Big money or "where the money is", then u have an obligation to behave in a responsible manner. To allegedly elbow a bloke 40 meters off the footy, hard enough to break his jaw, or even in the region of the head at any level of intention is an absolute disgrace
by Mr_Willy » Wed May 18, 2011 12:21 pm
by teaoby » Wed May 18, 2011 12:36 pm
Mr_Willy wrote:Interesting discussion this one - and there was in fact a player suspended in the Reserves after the fact last year after he belted another player from behind. I believe the difference was that the goal umpire saw the whole thing and later put in the report.
I was not at the game on Saturday, however I have been told that both umpires saw the incident and neither felt that it warranted further action...
by Goldberg » Wed May 18, 2011 12:46 pm
teaoby wrote:Mr_Willy wrote:Interesting discussion this one - and there was in fact a player suspended in the Reserves after the fact last year after he belted another player from behind. I believe the difference was that the goal umpire saw the whole thing and later put in the report.
I was not at the game on Saturday, however I have been told that both umpires saw the incident and neither felt that it warranted further action...
interesting. somewhat confusing seeing as it was obviously forceful enough to break the blokes jaw!?
by Mr_Willy » Wed May 18, 2011 1:13 pm
Goldberg wrote:teaoby wrote:Mr_Willy wrote:Interesting discussion this one - and there was in fact a player suspended in the Reserves after the fact last year after he belted another player from behind. I believe the difference was that the goal umpire saw the whole thing and later put in the report.
I was not at the game on Saturday, however I have been told that both umpires saw the incident and neither felt that it warranted further action...
interesting. somewhat confusing seeing as it was obviously forceful enough to break the blokes jaw!?
both umpires watching 40m behind the play were they? Who was officiating the actual play at the time?
by pigskin » Wed May 18, 2011 3:07 pm
by From The Outer » Wed May 18, 2011 9:15 pm
by biffboy » Wed May 18, 2011 11:04 pm
From The Outer wrote:Chris Ladhams will face the RMFL tribunal Tuesday night. By all reports he is in a deal of trouble. Apparently he is free to play this week however.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |