daysofourlives wrote:Ablett wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Ablett wrote:After reading a few of the teams that have been posted on here i was interested in peoples opinions about a few of the under 23 players in the association.
I may be new to this forum but i have been around and watched many years in the BLG so i no a few players.
I was quite interested in the ruckman debate... a few poeople have suggested young richie rosewell... wasn't he an under 17 last year... i would have thought there are better ruckman that are under 23 that would dominate rosewell...
I remember a few games last year when Luke Howard would have caught the selectors eyes... just wondering what people think of him... and i noticed tanunda now have two priors... just wondering whether its andrews younger bro... heard he goes alright as well...
yeah richie was an under 17 at south last year now at willaston i would say at this stage in richies development that howard is definitely in front of him, i wasnt aware that howard was under 23 thats why i picked rosewell, however when willaston played tanunda he beat wells and didnt do too badly against cragg-sappsford. still very raw but huge potential
yeah it is a younger brother goes very well
ok fairo... made the move cos of family reasons or club reasons... well im pretty sure howard is under 23 don't quote me tho... don't no enough about him... but if he was you'd have to think he'd be in with a shot as one of the ruckman??? read that howard was given best against angaston... might be to his advantage with the association game pretty close...
so andrew is trying to get a family affair going...
believe there was 2 reaasons, 1.wanted to play with his brother and willaston needed a ruckman 2.dont think the south coach rated him and he would be rotting in the 2s at south now with lutze and kennedy on their list
ok fairo... well its gwd to see some of last years under 17's playing well...
have lutze and kennedy done much this year???