by haloman » Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:52 pm
by haloman » Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:55 pm
overloaded wrote:You make some very valid points haloman and I repect your views. well said. good to have some knowlegable conversation from someone in the know.
Do the TFC have a right to put out their hand for their money back from the council haloman?
by haloman » Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:57 pm
MarblePark wrote:silicone skyline wrote:I won't read all that.
I did, and I am none the wiser.
by overloaded » Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:03 pm
haloman wrote:overloaded wrote:You make some very valid points haloman and I repect your views. well said. good to have some knowlegable conversation from someone in the know.
Do the TFC have a right to put out their hand for their money back from the council haloman?
I wouldn't think so but I have no idea what arrangments are in place between the TFC and the council. They may well have put a clause into the MOU protecting them if this was to happen.
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by untapped ability » Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:09 pm
haloman wrote:Untapped........
Not a Ravendale member dude. Bostons boy actually. I do play hockey tho, that's about as close as I get to them. As for cricket and the 20/20's. Without ravendale where is cricket playing the 20/20 stuff underlights? Dorward Oval maybe? Baseball helped cricket out bigtime over that Port Adelaide weekend so don't give me that rubbish either.
by haloman » Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:18 pm
overloaded wrote:haloman wrote:overloaded wrote:You make some very valid points haloman and I repect your views. well said. good to have some knowlegable conversation from someone in the know.
Do the TFC have a right to put out their hand for their money back from the council haloman?
I wouldn't think so but I have no idea what arrangments are in place between the TFC and the council. They may well have put a clause into the MOU protecting them if this was to happen.
Who did the busines plan?
by coyote ugly » Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:57 pm
by Media Park » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:24 pm
haloman wrote:MarblePark wrote:silicone skyline wrote:I won't read all that.
I did, and I am none the wiser.
Can't say I'm all that surprised. You already know everything MP
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by coyote ugly » Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:37 am
by onthebench » Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:55 am
by Eski » Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:42 am
by haloman » Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:00 am
coyote ugly wrote:As one of the 'I told you so' clan, can I just say why do we have to carry this burdon around with us for the next 20,30 ,40 years because of the mistakes made by a few people. shouldn't they be held accountable?
by another grub » Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:01 am
by overloaded » Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:19 am
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by another grub » Wed Jul 01, 2009 11:33 am
by onthebench » Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:21 pm
by haloman » Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:52 pm
by silicone skyline » Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:11 pm
by haloman » Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:29 pm
silicone skyline wrote:I would never bet on MP
by another grub » Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:36 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |