by Cougar » Sat Jan 14, 2012 8:50 pm
by 'Harry' » Sat Jan 14, 2012 9:36 pm
Cougar wrote:Fitzroy 180 v Rose Park 2-60
Fitzies won the toss and batted and were off to a poor start being 5-56, until the Rolling brothers put in what must of been close to 100. Harry hit hit them sweet making 60 odd while Aaron would have made 40. With 13 overs left Wehrman and Wimberley were off to flyer till both were dismissed by jaffars from Harry and Pidge leaving Rose Park 2-60.
Rose Park B and Enfield C were delayed week due to the pitch covered by foot long grass!
Seaton A 92 vs NEK 5-172
by No1_Source » Sat Jan 14, 2012 9:44 pm
by brod » Sat Jan 14, 2012 11:39 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Sat Jan 14, 2012 11:59 pm
brod wrote:Good effort by the Pirates who had....8 players.....amazingly captain Holland won the toss and bowled with 8 players on small (Salsibury North small oval for those who know it) and oval with a fast outfield
It was a shock to the senses when we went out to bat to see all those fielders
by Cougar » Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:27 am
'Harry' wrote:Cougar wrote:Fitzroy 180 v Rose Park 2-60
Fitzies won the toss and batted and were off to a poor start being 5-56, until the Rolling brothers put in what must of been close to 100. Harry hit hit them sweet making 60 odd while Aaron would have made 40. With 13 overs left Wehrman and Wimberley were off to flyer till both were dismissed by jaffars from Harry and Pidge leaving Rose Park 2-60.
Rose Park B and Enfield C were delayed week due to the pitch covered by foot long grass!
Seaton A 92 vs NEK 5-172
Now now Cougar i made 75I almost made my entire season score in one knock lol, so im taking every run i can get haha. But was definitely a good comeback, a much needed one otherwise things could have got embarrassing. We're in for a good one next week.
by whufc » Sun Jan 15, 2012 8:45 am
brod wrote:Paralowie v NE Knights
Paralowie HS
NE Knights 189
Clune 52
Allen 37
S. Holland 5/58
B. Norton 2/30 (first 38 balls were dots and after 7.5 overs 1/1 then ....664)
M. Frith 2/30
Paralowie 0/34
S. Holland 29*
B. Norton 1*
Good effort by the Pirates who had....8 players.....amazingly captain Holland won the toss and bowled with 8 players on small (Salsibury North small oval for those who know it) and oval with a fast outfield
It was a shock to the senses when we went out to bat to see all those fielders
by moriachi » Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:04 am
brod wrote:Paralowie v NE Knights
Paralowie HS
NE Knights 189
Clune 52
Allen 37
S. Holland 5/58
B. Norton 2/30 (first 38 balls were dots and after 7.5 overs 1/1 then ....664)
M. Frith 2/30
Paralowie 0/34
S. Holland 29*
B. Norton 1*
Good effort by the Pirates who had....8 players.....amazingly captain Holland won the toss and bowled with 8 players on small (Salsibury North small oval for those who know it) and oval with a fast outfield
It was a shock to the senses when we went out to bat to see all those fielders
by moriachi » Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:07 am
by carey » Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:11 am
whufc wrote:brod wrote:Paralowie v NE Knights
Paralowie HS
NE Knights 189
Clune 52
Allen 37
S. Holland 5/58
B. Norton 2/30 (first 38 balls were dots and after 7.5 overs 1/1 then ....664)
M. Frith 2/30
Paralowie 0/34
S. Holland 29*
B. Norton 1*
Good effort by the Pirates who had....8 players.....amazingly captain Holland won the toss and bowled with 8 players on small (Salsibury North small oval for those who know it) and oval with a fast outfield
It was a shock to the senses when we went out to bat to see all those fielders
Couple of stupid questions, how come Paralowie A Grade is only playing with 8 surprised to see use a struggling for numbers. Also what with the Pirates, i always thought Paralowie were the roos.
by carey » Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:14 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:brod wrote:Good effort by the Pirates who had....8 players.....amazingly captain Holland won the toss and bowled with 8 players on small (Salsibury North small oval for those who know it) and oval with a fast outfield
It was a shock to the senses when we went out to bat to see all those fielders
Restrict a side to 189 with only 8 players on that oval is a bit better than a good effort I think!! Thats awesome! Side should be filthy if they dont hit 300+ on that postage stamp!
by carey » Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:17 am
whufc wrote:brod wrote:Paralowie v NE Knights
Paralowie HS
NE Knights 189
Clune 52
Allen 37
S. Holland 5/58
B. Norton 2/30 (first 38 balls were dots and after 7.5 overs 1/1 then ....664)
M. Frith 2/30
Paralowie 0/34
S. Holland 29*
B. Norton 1*
Good effort by the Pirates who had....8 players.....amazingly captain Holland won the toss and bowled with 8 players on small (Salsibury North small oval for those who know it) and oval with a fast outfield
It was a shock to the senses when we went out to bat to see all those fielders
Couple of stupid questions, how come Paralowie A Grade is only playing with 8 surprised to see use a struggling for numbers. Also what with the Pirates, i always thought Paralowie were the roos.
by One Ball Bandit » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:16 pm
by Krav Man » Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:15 pm
by Noel Craig » Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:31 pm
Krav Man wrote:Fitzroy B Grade bowled Central Mission out for 85. Old man Lucas took 7-31.
Roys are 8-111 in reply.
by the kraft » Sun Jan 15, 2012 5:24 pm
One Ball Bandit wrote:can anyone tell me what the score from Div 2 PV vs Adelaide Lutheran? im too poor to get a Sunday Mail
by carey » Sun Jan 15, 2012 8:57 pm
the kraft wrote:One Ball Bandit wrote:can anyone tell me what the score from Div 2 PV vs Adelaide Lutheran? im too poor to get a Sunday Mail
Lutheran, all out 140ish. Starke 6for, PV 0 for 24. Or something like that.
by One Ball Bandit » Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:29 pm
carey wrote:the kraft wrote:One Ball Bandit wrote:can anyone tell me what the score from Div 2 PV vs Adelaide Lutheran? im too poor to get a Sunday Mail
Lutheran, all out 140ish. Starke 6for, PV 0 for 24. Or something like that.
Doesnt really work out well for you guys does it OBB?
Not looking to far ahead as we have 2 very tough games coming up but we were looking at the div2 ladder to see the differance between finishing 2nd or top we thought it was Adel luth 3rd and you guys 4th but i now see PV are 4th and should they win this game which looks likely it makes it even harder for you guys mate.
by the kraft » Mon Jan 16, 2012 5:27 am
by dark & stormy » Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:19 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |