Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Talk on the national game

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby White Line Fever » Tue May 10, 2011 10:58 pm

that's a disgrace.
3 games what a joke.

Someone needs to do something
User avatar
White Line Fever
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2896
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:52 pm
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby cennals05 » Wed May 11, 2011 9:09 am

I can't believe it. What a joke.

Time to put all the players in WA bibs and be done with it.
cennals05
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1487
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 12:43 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 146 times
Been liked: 248 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby Johno6 » Wed May 11, 2011 9:17 am

what.....the....fluff!!

as much as i love judd he got off with his elbow to pavlichs face ( as has been mentioned a million times etc etc etc)
but then jt gets 3 weeks for a tackle..
R.I.P Mum 28/02/12



Asterix Users - Squibs
User avatar
Johno6
Coach
 
Posts: 14684
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:37 am
Has liked: 344 times
Been liked: 604 times
Grassroots Team: Golden Grove

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby Drop Bear » Wed May 11, 2011 10:28 am

CoverKing wrote:Apparently Koschitzke only got off for his bump because he hit his good shoulder, not the one curnow had just injured. If Koschitzke got reported and suspended for that, considering curnow had gone off and came back on, I would have thought every player would go off with an "injury" and come back on since they wouldn't be allowed to be touched. Joke!


What's the difference between bumping his good or bad shoulder? He still bumped an injured player. If Montagna was banned, then so should be Koschitzke.

A fine would have been more appropriate for MonTAGna. I think a suspension is over the top, but I'm not surprised with this pathetic Tribunal.
1. M Hayden.
User avatar
Drop Bear
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2833
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: The Doghouse
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby JK » Wed May 11, 2011 10:39 am

I haven't seen the Trengove tackle, but Im guessing it was just a hard tackle with an unfortunate and unintended consequence.

I understand the AFL wanting to protect the head, but they just seem so inconsistent with how they go about it .. Would have thought Tambling was pretty lucky to only get 1 for an intentional elbow to an opponents head.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby Footy Smart » Wed May 11, 2011 10:46 am

Drop Bear wrote:
CoverKing wrote:Apparently Koschitzke only got off for his bump because he hit his good shoulder, not the one curnow had just injured. If Koschitzke got reported and suspended for that, considering curnow had gone off and came back on, I would have thought every player would go off with an "injury" and come back on since they wouldn't be allowed to be touched. Joke!


What's the difference between bumping his good or bad shoulder? He still bumped an injured player. If Montagna was banned, then so should be Koschitzke.

A fine would have been more appropriate for MonTAGna. I think a suspension is over the top, but I'm not surprised with this pathetic Tribunal.


DB, Crunow had come back on when Kosi bumped him. Montagna hit him as he was going to seek medical attention. Suspension for Montagna is suitable IMO. This doesnt mean the game is going 'soft' its a dog act to hit someone while they are down injured.
User avatar
Footy Smart
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5088
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 1:16 pm
Has liked: 54 times
Been liked: 118 times
Grassroots Team: Modbury

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby Footy Smart » Wed May 11, 2011 10:48 am

Constance_Perm wrote:I haven't seen the Trengove tackle, but Im guessing it was just a hard tackle with an unfortunate and unintended consequence.

I understand the AFL wanting to protect the head, but they just seem so inconsistent with how they go about it .. Would have thought Tambling was pretty lucky to only get 1 for an intentional elbow to an opponents head.



Trenggove had hold of Dangerfields arm and swing him from around the waiste and his head hit the ground. In that split second he waqs supposed to consider his duty of care to Dangerfield :oops: That is making the game 'soft'
User avatar
Footy Smart
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5088
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 1:16 pm
Has liked: 54 times
Been liked: 118 times
Grassroots Team: Modbury

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby teaoby » Wed May 11, 2011 11:08 am

the biggest issue i have with it is that Dangermouse actually puts his other hand out to protect himself! its not as if Jack had both his arms pinned and drove him into the ground.

also he lands on his side/shoulder not his head. yes his head gets a bit of a whiplash effect but geez its footy for crying out loud! :twisted:
beards dont kill people, people with beards kill people
User avatar
teaoby
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 919
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:10 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 11 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby JK » Wed May 11, 2011 11:13 am

The AFL is mimicking everyday life ... Seems they're determined to always make sure someone is to blame, instead of accepting that on the footy field, as in life, sometimes shit just happens.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby scoob » Wed May 11, 2011 11:18 am

The worst decision I have seen made by the tribunal... FFS Dangerfield had an arm free, I thought it was a near perfect tackle, worthy of 3 weeks - F@#k off! Are we now going to teach youngster not to pin an arm because someone may get hurt. Still perplexed how a legal tackle can get more games than an intentional elbow to an unsuspecting players head... Good Image you are putting out there AFL!!!

Do the tribunal still hear evidence from the 'victims'? Was the Crows medical staff evidence used? Why are they not speaking out about it and saying that there was nothing in it?
User avatar
scoob
Veteran
 
Posts: 3702
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: The Track
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby CoverKing » Wed May 11, 2011 11:35 am

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

Bloody good to see all these AFL players get behind trengove on Twitter and the likes. I liked Mitch Robinson's little dig. Would love to see a sit down by the players this week or something of the sorts, to get the point across that **** happens on the footy field and that a perfect tackle can get someone injured. Stop being such wankers and let the game stay how it is. Yes, its unfortunate to see Dangerfield get injured, but it was a perfect tackle. Pin the arm, so he cant dispose of the ball, its what everyone is taught. Feel sorry for the fella
I Want to be a Western Youth Ranger!
CoverKing
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7359
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:29 pm
Location: The front bar!
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Flinders Park

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby Mark_Beswick » Wed May 11, 2011 11:45 am

Thats why I gave up AFL memberships and went back to the local state league

AFL is killing the golden goose - (I guess thats becuase they are run by geese)
Mark_Beswick
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Lockleys
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby teaoby » Wed May 11, 2011 12:40 pm

scoob wrote:The worst decision I have seen made by the tribunal... FFS Dangerfield had an arm free, I thought it was a near perfect tackle, worthy of 3 weeks - F@#k off! Are we now going to teach youngster not to pin an arm because someone may get hurt. Still perplexed how a legal tackle can get more games than an intentional elbow to an unsuspecting players head... Good Image you are putting out there AFL!!!

Do the tribunal still hear evidence from the 'victims'? Was the Crows medical staff evidence used? Why are they not speaking out about it and saying that there was nothing in it?



from what i read, they actually used the crows medical report against Jack!! sighting that because of the tackle dangermouse was concussed!
beards dont kill people, people with beards kill people
User avatar
teaoby
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 919
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:10 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 11 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby Dirko » Wed May 11, 2011 12:47 pm

Tis a crock of shit for sure.

Hope the players fire up and make their felings well known to the AFL.
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby best on hill » Wed May 11, 2011 5:16 pm

forgive me if i am wrong but i thought AFL/Australian rules football was a contact sport, yes the AFL has introduced rules to protect the head but trengrove didn't make contact with dangerfields head!
im ****** if i know but the rules committee, umpires and the tribunal are reeking havoc on our great game.
COWELL FOOTBALL CLUB est.1901
premiers 1902,04,07,22,24,26,27,28,31,32,34,37,38,39,46,50,52,53,54,55,58,59,69(cowell north),96,99,2006,07,09
oldest club on E.P.!
User avatar
best on hill
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1007
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:52 am
Location: standing on magarey mound
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Cowell

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby lebron » Wed May 11, 2011 6:48 pm

Malcolm Blight made it famous, 'pathetic'!
lebron
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 525
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 7:37 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Mt Barker

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby Dutchy » Wed May 11, 2011 6:51 pm



How many weeks would have Schell got if this was in the AFL?

User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46008
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2586 times
Been liked: 4214 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby Dutchy » Wed May 11, 2011 6:54 pm

CK wrote:Chris Judd has been reported for two separate offences, instigating a melee and engaging in a melee, from last night, but remains eligible for the Brownlow, as both offences are only fines.


Unbelievable :roll:
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46008
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2586 times
Been liked: 4214 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby Aerie » Wed May 11, 2011 7:24 pm

3 weeks for that! Got to be kidding. Absolutely nothing wrong with that tackle.
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5740
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 583 times

Re: Melbourne's Trengove facing 2 weeks

Postby cripple » Wed May 11, 2011 8:07 pm

The melbourne players response on twitter is getting a fair airing at the moment on AFL 360. Rightly so far no one agree's with the 3 weeks.
cripple
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1261
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 12:21 am
Location: Mexico
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |