by Sojourner » Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:39 am
by Dogwatcher » Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:47 am
by Dogwatcher » Wed Dec 24, 2008 12:04 pm
by Pseudo » Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:51 pm
by SDK » Wed Dec 24, 2008 6:20 pm
by Sheik Yerbouti » Wed Dec 24, 2008 6:22 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Mr Xenephon was our No Pokies MP but really what did he achieve in that sphere? I can't see any major legislation that was passed in reducing pokies.
by Mickyj » Wed Dec 24, 2008 9:00 pm
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Mr Xenephon was our No Pokies MP but really what did he achieve in that sphere? I can't see any major legislation that was passed in reducing pokies.
Oh dunno about that, word around the campfire is that he passed on all his tax funded anti North Adelaide files to the owners of the Northern Tavern to continue the fight against evil.
Win win, North bought the pub & have kicked on while the pokie kings got a big quid to add a new craft at the marina.
Salt of the earth type of fella, just ask the Holden workers.
by Mic » Thu Dec 25, 2008 2:15 pm
by holden78 » Thu Dec 25, 2008 3:36 pm
by Barto » Fri Dec 26, 2008 9:58 am
Mic wrote:Not sure if they are ruining the SANFL but I reckon they are ruining most of Australia's pubs.
by SDK » Fri Dec 26, 2008 11:33 am
by Psyber » Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:02 pm
Absolutely, that's why I think they should be restricted to true clubs where the membership are clearly advised that playing them is a contribution to club funds.SDK wrote:I have never put 1 cent into the pokies since they have been here.
Cant see the fun in them and cant see the sense in playing against a machine that is programmed to beat you...you can not win over time.
by Dutchy » Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:15 pm
SDK wrote:I have never put 1 cent into the pokies since they have been here.
Cant see the fun in them and cant see the sense in playing against a machine that is programmed to beat you...you can not win over time.
by stan » Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:38 pm
Psyber wrote:Absolutely, that's why I think they should be restricted to true clubs where the membership are clearly advised that playing them is a contribution to club funds.SDK wrote:I have never put 1 cent into the pokies since they have been here.
Cant see the fun in them and cant see the sense in playing against a machine that is programmed to beat you...you can not win over time.
Then the government can quit taxing them because there are few and the revenue would be small.
At present the governments of all the states are addicted to gambling revenue, and will permit the big venues to do whatever they like for the income.re of the income.
This is a conflict of interest situation governments should not get into in the first place.
by Psyber » Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:46 pm
You are right there. Perhaps they'd like to put up government backed, and taxed, drug vending machines in the pubs and clubs too.stan wrote:Thats a good thought Psyber but in a time when governments are facing smaller bugets and there big projects falling into the toilet, there is no chance in hell they would do anything to damage that Tax Revenue.Psyber wrote:Absolutely, that's why I think they should be restricted to true clubs where the membership are clearly advised that playing them is a contribution to club funds.SDK wrote:I have never put 1 cent into the pokies since they have been here.
Cant see the fun in them and cant see the sense in playing against a machine that is programmed to beat you...you can not win over time.
Then the government can quit taxing them because there are few and the revenue would be small.
At present the governments of all the states are addicted to gambling revenue, and will permit the big venues to do whatever they like for the income.re of the income.
This is a conflict of interest situation governments should not get into in the first place.
by SDK » Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:57 pm
by Barto » Fri Dec 26, 2008 11:12 pm
by Psyber » Sat Dec 27, 2008 8:41 am
Headline: "Unemployment looms as business cuts costs!"Barto wrote:How about ZERO tax to community clubs and an increased tax to businesses? Just a thought.
by Barto » Sat Dec 27, 2008 1:43 pm
Psyber wrote:Headline: "Unemployment looms as business cuts costs!"Barto wrote:How about ZERO tax to community clubs and an increased tax to businesses? Just a thought.
Having once or twice been involved in running a small business, I can assure you they rarely make much money, except in boom times - that's why I got out.
Yet the last figures I saw suggested small business provides a lot of the jobs in this country - this means the owners work for peanuts a lot of the time.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |