by JK » Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:39 pm
by CENTURION » Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:42 pm
by eaglehaslanded » Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:43 pm
by dedja » Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:52 pm
by Grahaml » Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:13 pm
by finn » Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:13 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Liam Jurrah looks set to join the Magpies
http://www.portadelaidefc.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/6038/newsid/152264/default.aspxWhile it will not select Jurrah at tomorrow’s pre-season or rookie drafts, Port Adelaide has committed to ongoing support effective immediately:
• Port Adelaide plans to recruit Jurrah to play in its SANFL team during 2013
• Port Adelaide, the AFL and the AFL Players’ Association will work together to provide additional support to assist Jurrah as he confronts off-field issues, including his court case in the Northern Territory
• Jurrah will be given the opportunity to work with Power Community Ltd, the community development arm of the Port Adelaide Football Club
• Port Adelaide will provide all possible assistance to help Jurrah’s rehabilitation from injury
• Port Adelaide is committed to again assessing Jurrah’s suitability for selection ahead of the 2014 AFL season
“We believe these measures will enable Liam to have the best possible opportunity to find his way back into the AFL system in great physical condition, with proven form at SANFL level and with those non-football matters fully dealt with,” Rohde said.
by hereselmo1 » Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:41 pm
by The Dark Knight » Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:55 pm
dedja wrote:my bet is he won't last the season unfortunately ...
by whufc » Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:56 pm
hereselmo1 wrote:Watch the One Port concept go from an evil plot to kill off the Magpies to an evil plot to ensure the Magpies get an unfair advantage in the space of one newspaper article.
by dedja » Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:56 pm
by beenreal » Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:30 pm
Grahaml wrote:Will the Power still offer him a job if he goes to a club that isn't the Magpies? I doubt it. This is the reason people were so opposed to the one club idea. Luckily though, Port are so weak they can have these little advantages. They need them.
by RustyCage » Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:39 pm
whufc wrote:hereselmo1 wrote:Watch the One Port concept go from an evil plot to kill off the Magpies to an evil plot to ensure the Magpies get an unfair advantage in the space of one newspaper article.
In all seriousness though, do u honestly think the magpies won't use being aligned with the Power as a recruiting tool.
Have heard Henry Slattery will be working for the Power and playing for the Magpies next season as well
by whufc » Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:42 pm
beenreal wrote:Grahaml wrote:Will the Power still offer him a job if he goes to a club that isn't the Magpies? I doubt it. This is the reason people were so opposed to the one club idea. Luckily though, Port are so weak they can have these little advantages. They need them.
What part of the PAFC planning on recruiting him to its SANFL side didn't you understand?
And looking very much forward to Slattery donning the famous Black and White while working for our club.
And I don't recall us being so "weak" last time we played your mob!
by oldfella » Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:44 pm
by whufc » Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:45 pm
pafc1870 wrote:whufc wrote:hereselmo1 wrote:Watch the One Port concept go from an evil plot to kill off the Magpies to an evil plot to ensure the Magpies get an unfair advantage in the space of one newspaper article.
In all seriousness though, do u honestly think the magpies won't use being aligned with the Power as a recruiting tool.
Have heard Henry Slattery will be working for the Power and playing for the Magpies next season as well
Hasn't he worked at the Prince of Wales for a couple of years anyway?
by beenreal » Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:56 pm
oldfella wrote:This does not seem to fit the 2010 statement by a Director of the Port Adelaide Magpies, John Firthon 891 Breakfast that the approving vote from SANFL Directors for One Team was welcome news.
Mr Firth reinforced that the rejoining of the teams would not affect the on field operations of the clubs, with only administration and off field management merging. "It's commercial and administrative rather than football."
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:03 pm
beenreal wrote:oldfella wrote:This does not seem to fit the 2010 statement by a Director of the Port Adelaide Magpies, John Firthon 891 Breakfast that the approving vote from SANFL Directors for One Team was welcome news.
Mr Firth reinforced that the rejoining of the teams would not affect the on field operations of the clubs, with only administration and off field management merging. "It's commercial and administrative rather than football."
Please enlighten us on how this doesn't fit? The PAFC want to offer Jurrah a support network. How does that happen if he is at another club?
by oldfella » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:08 pm
by CENTURION » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:08 pm
by oldfella » Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:13 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |