Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Barto » Thu Feb 12, 2009 3:10 pm

smac wrote:It is now governed by the Mother's address, no more choice in those situations.


Kick mum out of home.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Dutchy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:38 am

2 page spread about this in the Mail today :shock:

Looking at the boundaries Sturt have nothing to complain about, they have a huge zone from the city and 90% of the Hills which is one fo the fastest growing areas in Australia and a massive advantage of their country zone all being within a 2 hours drive of Adelaide

To give up a suburb to Westies who have suffered from teh drought in the Riverland and have the neighbouring suburbs anyway makes sense

Also I dont see the Blackwood FC complaining about their new West Adelaide recruit, 2007 B & F winner Simon McCormick, if anything this is the perfect opportunity for them to bed a good relationship with Westies as Simon is still involved at the Bloods
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46012
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2589 times
Been liked: 4215 times

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Jimmy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:54 am

Dutchy wrote:2 page spread about this in the Mail today :shock:

Looking at the boundaries Sturt have nothing to complain about, they have a huge zone from the city and 90% of the Hills which is one fo the fastest growing areas in Australia and a massive advantage of their country zone all being within a 2 hours drive of Adelaide

To give up a suburb to Westies who have suffered from teh drought in the Riverland and have the neighbouring suburbs anyway makes sense

Also I dont see the Blackwood FC complaining about their new West Adelaide recruit, 2007 B & F winner Simon McCormick, if anything this is the perfect opportunity for them to bed a good relationship with Westies as Simon is still involved at the Bloods


well, the argument is that they have built a relationship over time and to see all the hard work go to shit, its pretty disappointing...i wonder how hard they really thought about the decision? :?
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Dutchy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:01 am

They lose one club out of approx 60/70 in a growth zone to a club that has all the neighbouring clubs anyway

Sturt seriously need to start worrying about things they can control :roll:
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46012
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2589 times
Been liked: 4215 times

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Jimmy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:07 am

Dutchy wrote:They lose one club out of approx 60/70 in a growth zone to a club that has all the neighbouring clubs anyway

Sturt seriously need to start worrying about things they can control :roll:


well gosh darn it, thank god you said coz they were just sitting on their ******* thumbs...all hail firechief Dutchy :roll:

blackwood is just an example of the type of relationship lost in this move...it sucks, but there isnt anything they can do...but still need to let them know how you feel.
Carn the blues!!!!!
Jimmy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6348
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:02 pm
Has liked: 125 times
Been liked: 44 times

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Dutchy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 12:03 pm

:D AFL players, coaches, councils, rezoning, Unley Oval....all whinging and moaning Ive heard come out of the Sturt FC in the off season....move on
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46012
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2589 times
Been liked: 4215 times

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby BL&G_Ump » Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:21 pm

Dutchy wrote:2 page spread about this in the Mail today :shock:

Looking at the boundaries Sturt have nothing to complain about, they have a huge zone from the city and 90% of the Hills which is one fo the fastest growing areas in Australia and a massive advantage of their country zone all being within a 2 hours drive of Adelaide

To give up a suburb to Westies who have suffered from teh drought in the Riverland and have the neighbouring suburbs anyway makes sense

Also I dont see the Blackwood FC complaining about their new West Adelaide recruit, 2007 B & F winner Simon McCormick, if anything this is the perfect opportunity for them to bed a good relationship with Westies as Simon is still involved at the Bloods

Exactly, Centrals and Norwood's zones are the size of a postage stamp while most of the other clubs have massive areas!
BL&G_Ump
Rookie
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:46 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby redandblack » Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:50 pm

Surely one of the biggest whinges about a totally logical decision of all time.

They've got the fastest growing area in the Metro zone and their country zone adjoins their city zone.

They've got absolutely nothing to moan about.

Losing old areas has happened to all clubs every boundary adjustment.
redandblack
 

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Wedgie » Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:13 pm

Not suprised to see North losing the most players in the zone reshuffle.
They really have upset someone down at West Lakes.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Voice » Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:22 pm

Notice that all of a sudden some of the above posts are saying that there area is to small etc. The argument when this story first came out was that their needs to be an equal amount of a certain age in all zones. Now people are telling us to stop whingeing because their area looks smaller in size to ours. Which is it, land area or amount of a certain age group in an area.
Just remember when you say ou area looks big just how many old people live in Unley and its surrounds. Not many youngans around there lads, so that might be why our area looks so big :roll:
User avatar
Voice
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:24 am
Location: :noitacoL
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Wedgie » Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:22 pm

I think the current system just looking at lads aged 10-19 is flawed, it should also look at the amount of football clubs in an area, not much used in getting a heap of teenagers that play basketball, hockey or soccer.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Voice » Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:27 pm

Wedgie wrote:I think the current system just looking at lads aged 10-19 is flawed, it should also look at the amount of football clubs in an area, not much used in getting a heap of teenagers that play basketball, hockey or soccer.

Good point! There are alot of sports for kids to choose these days. Participation rate should come in to all zoning decisions.
User avatar
Voice
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:24 am
Location: :noitacoL
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby spell_check » Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:23 pm

Hooray, they have the exact boundaries in there! :) ;)

And, I didn't know we had Virginia as part of the metro zone. Seems a bit odd, but I guess it's because the country zone above it is also Eagles.
spell_check
Coach
 
 
Posts: 18814
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:56 pm
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 225 times

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby topsywaldron » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:32 pm

redandblack wrote:They've got absolutely nothing to moan about.


Sturt fans do love a good moan don't they?

Anytime they want to swap Mt Barker for one of Norwood's zones would be fine by me.
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Dutchy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:39 pm

topsywaldron wrote:
redandblack wrote:They've got absolutely nothing to moan about.


Sturt fans do love a good moan don't they?

Anytime they want to swap Mt Barker for one of Norwood's zones would be fine by me.


They certainly dont want to mention what they have got, just what they have lost...

I dare say they better get used to it cause if the Mt Barker area keeps growing like it is then they will lose more
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46012
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2589 times
Been liked: 4215 times

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Bluedemon » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:40 pm

topsywaldron wrote:
redandblack wrote:They've got absolutely nothing to moan about.


Sturt fans do love a good moan don't they?

Anytime they want to swap Mt Barker for one of Norwood's zones would be fine by me.


We have already taken Newton off you, whooppeedoo. We can recruit the next players to play for the socceroos.
SAFooty.net, where you hear the community football news first
User avatar
Bluedemon
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4890
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 1:30 pm
Location: Goodwood
Has liked: 127 times
Been liked: 106 times

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby topsywaldron » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:34 pm

Dutchy wrote:They certainly dont want to mention what they have got


Benson "I mentioned Mt Barker once but I think I got away with it"

Chandler "However did they win in 2002?"
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Dutchy » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:53 pm

kookas wrote: We can recruit the next players to play for the socceroos.


Care to expand or edit that comment kookas?
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46012
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2589 times
Been liked: 4215 times

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Barto » Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:55 am

Probably more relevant comment in the 70's (re Newton).

Are their any market gardens left in the metro area? I haven't been to Adelaide in decades. Possibly would explain all the hydroponic stores that sprung up for a while.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Sturt lose Blackwood as a recruiting zone

Postby Ronnie » Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:11 am

A bad decision for Sturt and the people of Blackwood. Still, i understand the Sturt zone is still pretty good. A joined city and country zone, Mt Barker, Murray Bridge and surrounds, a fair slice of the hills zone, eastern suburbs etc would have most clubs happy. The only thing is Burnside and surrounds aren't renowned to be good recruiting zones or have junior football clubs. Still, a difficult balancing act for the league which they might not always get right.
Ronnie
Reserves
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 7:57 am
Has liked: 8 times
Been liked: 90 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |