by Dutchy » Fri Dec 17, 2010 7:36 pm
by whufc » Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:04 pm
by nickname » Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:11 pm
by whufc » Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:14 pm
nickname wrote:My thoughts would be to immediately try to find out what a knee ending injury was.
by statsman » Fri Dec 17, 2010 10:19 pm
whufc wrote:nickname wrote:My thoughts would be to immediately try to find out what a knee ending injury was.
lol![]()
all fixed
question still applies
by DOC » Fri Dec 17, 2010 10:26 pm
by Wedgie » Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:05 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Wedgie » Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:07 pm
once_were_warriors wrote:Wedgie wrote:I could just imagine North and Port having the conversation, "gee if we were smart like Glenelg and the Eagles we'd have 6 premierships between us instead of 50 and only have supporters that rock up when were winning and be experts at choking in the finals, let's do it"
I've read some crap on this site but he inference that clubs that make the finals in one specific year (or 2 or 3) are "smarter" than others takes the cake easily.
A bit like you grouping North in with Port to count premierships , as if North are in Port's league.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by westcoastpanther » Sat Dec 18, 2010 12:44 am
by Barto » Sat Dec 18, 2010 1:21 am
by DOC » Sat Dec 18, 2010 6:45 am
Wedgie wrote:They also both had the worst game plans for the last 2 years.
Coincidence or not?
<Insert Twilight Zone Music here>
by once_were_warriors » Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:57 am
Wedgie wrote:once_were_warriors wrote:Wedgie wrote:I could just imagine North and Port having the conversation, "gee if we were smart like Glenelg and the Eagles we'd have 6 premierships between us instead of 50 and only have supporters that rock up when were winning and be experts at choking in the finals, let's do it"
I've read some crap on this site but he inference that clubs that make the finals in one specific year (or 2 or 3) are "smarter" than others takes the cake easily.
A bit like you grouping North in with Port to count premierships , as if North are in Port's league.
13 flags and not taking the easy way out when times get hard means we're way out of your league sunshine.
North and Port are both in double figures, its more than I can say for any of your 3 clubs.
by CENTURION » Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:35 am
DOC wrote:But not many others . Weak as urine.
by Jim05 » Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:55 am
by once_were_warriors » Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:59 am
CENTURION wrote:DOC wrote:But not many others . Weak as urine.
sorry but We'll stick to the important things......like trying to win Premierships in The SANFL, after all, isn't that what it's all about?
by CENTURION » Sat Dec 18, 2010 9:13 am
once_were_warriors wrote:CENTURION wrote:DOC wrote:But not many others . Weak as urine.
sorry but We'll stick to the important things......like trying to win Premierships in The SANFL, after all, isn't that what it's all about?
Apparently Not.
Its now all about the Murdoch Cup and the huge financial rewards and accolades from winning it.
by Bluedemon » Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:02 am
by dedja » Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:05 am
Dutchy wrote:We talking 1991?![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |