csbowes wrote:I chose the right year to sell my Sturt memorabilia that's for sure... it'll be worth f*** all in a couple of years.
Sums you up then I guess
by CUTTERMAN » Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:37 am
csbowes wrote:I chose the right year to sell my Sturt memorabilia that's for sure... it'll be worth f*** all in a couple of years.
by maccad » Fri Aug 09, 2013 1:45 am
by csbowes » Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:01 am
CUTTERMAN wrote:csbowes wrote:I chose the right year to sell my Sturt memorabilia that's for sure... it'll be worth f*** all in a couple of years.
Sums you up then I guess
by csbowes » Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:03 am
smac wrote:Because it's not true.
by csbowes » Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:07 am
maccad wrote:sorry am I missing something here has the vote been done yet and if so have centrals and norwood changed their vote. please don't bag me just that I have not heard anything official.
by Harry the Horse » Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:47 am
by Wedgie » Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:48 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by RB » Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:49 am
Pseudo wrote:RB wrote:Slaven's speech tonight was basically a justification for caving in, based on fear and false assumptions. He said that WWTFC would suffer if the Crows had reserves in the amateur league. His reason for voting yes was that the club would try and use the Crows to boost their junior membership etc. He referred to the fact that he believed it important that there be a 'nexus' between the SANFL and the Crows. However he kept saying that he 'didn't know' how it would all pan out, and admitted that many of the predictions, such as Chapman's prediction that the Crows would get 4,000 every week, were impossible to be sure of at this stage.
Slaven argued that we should not reject change, but in the end he did not really explain why this would be a positive for the club or why we needed to do this. While he did not tell any obvious outright untruths, little of what he said was relevant or reason enough to do something which could seriously threaten the short and long term viability of the club. I sincerely apologize on behalf of my club to all the real SANFL supporters on this site for whom the SANFL is set to be forever sullied by the presence of the VFL reserves teams...
RB, round up enough cats and dogs to call a special general meeting and spill your board.
by LPH » Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:12 am
Harry the Horse wrote:Won't be a vote before next Friday at the earliest.
Horrible, weak and shameless abandonment of SA football by the Eagles.
But not at all unexpected from a club that was born from similar circumstances.
They are the Peel Thunder of SA.
by adelaidefc » Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:21 am
by Wedgie » Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:26 am
adelaidefc wrote:An update ... today is not going to be "D-Day: for the reserves decision. The Commission did want to have SANFL club feedback on the model it endorsed two weeks ago but it is expected that discussion will continue. The AFC has not set a deadline for a decision. David
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Dutchy » Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:41 am
by LPH » Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:50 am
Dutchy wrote:So what was the general mood at the Eagles last night? Contrite, Submissive, Angry????
by Macca19 » Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:55 am
Aerie wrote:I am willing to give this a go with what Slaven put forward tonight. Under the proposed plan by the Football Commission I wouldn't have.
by Macca19 » Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:02 am
Two clubs - Central and Norwood - want the Magpies' licence to play in the SANFL (that was signed on December 1, 2010) to be revoked.
If this move is successful, the Power would then have no choice but to replicate the Crows with a stand-alone team in the SANFL.
by UK Fan » Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:02 am
saintal wrote:Aerie wrote:It was 7-1 last night. Surprising which club was the only one against. A club that probably doesn't hold much sway in the competition (again, my thoughts only).
Why does the South vote surprise you, just out of interest? And do you think the club was being honest with this 7-1 count, and wasn't fudging figures so they didn't look like the only bad guys in all this? Would love to know what Centrals and Norwood are thinking.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by whufc » Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:05 am
by Harry the Horse » Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:05 am
LEH wrote:Harry the Horse wrote:Won't be a vote before next Friday at the earliest.
Horrible, weak and shameless abandonment of SA football by the Eagles.
But not at all unexpected from a club that was born from similar circumstances.
They are the Peel Thunder of SA.
That may have some truth Harry, but...
Don't tar us all with the same brush.
I have been fighting this since 2011 - some on here have bagged me in the past, "keyboard warrior", "that Eagle supporter in the middle of Woodville Oval", etc.
Many of those have only woken up to the issue this season when it all of a sudden became a reality - perhaps apathy when it was 1st mooted 2 yrs ago has contributed to the current situation, had some others 'come on board' instead of being typically critical, there may have been a different outcome.
BTW, Glenelg are voting Yes too - are they 'weak & shameless'?
by once_were_warriors » Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:06 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |