UK Fan wrote:Crows become more selfish so we put the rent up at Adelaide Oval and refuse to sell the licences.
Guess what happens next Timmy ????
Dont forget the rent for their training base at West Lakes
by daysofourlives » Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:50 pm
UK Fan wrote:Crows become more selfish so we put the rent up at Adelaide Oval and refuse to sell the licences.
Guess what happens next Timmy ????
by UK Fan » Thu Jul 25, 2013 4:06 pm
daysofourlives wrote:UK Fan wrote:Crows become more selfish so we put the rent up at Adelaide Oval and refuse to sell the licences.
Guess what happens next Timmy ????
Dont forget the rent for their training base at West Lakes
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by sjt » Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:05 pm
UK Fan wrote:daysofourlives wrote:UK Fan wrote:Crows become more selfish so we put the rent up at Adelaide Oval and refuse to sell the licences.
Guess what happens next Timmy ????
Dont forget the rent for their training base at West Lakes
Oh and you know how you wanted to pay those licences off over 15 years interest free.
We have had a change of heart on that aswell. Upfront payment or bugger ye orf!!!!!
Any other threats youve got chapman.
by GrandOldFlag » Thu Jul 25, 2013 9:26 pm
by SDK » Thu Jul 25, 2013 9:56 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:21 pm
by Dogwatcher » Fri Jul 26, 2013 9:38 am
CUTTERMAN wrote:Going by history I'd save my praise for Port until this thing pans out a bit more. At least until the end of 2014 and see how many Power players are moved by stealth to Port Magpies.
by Booney » Fri Jul 26, 2013 9:43 am
Dogwatcher wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Going by history I'd save my praise for Port until this thing pans out a bit more. At least until the end of 2014 and see how many Power players are moved by stealth to Port Magpies.
Agreed.
Port's decision makes them look the good guys, but, inevitably, if the Crows get what they want, by doing the heavy lifting, Port will too.
It's an interesting turn around isn't it? Port were the pariahs for ruining the SANFL in 1990. Now in the public's eye the Crows are trying to do the same in 2013, with Port looking the good guys. Well played, Port. Canny.
by Agile » Fri Jul 26, 2013 9:47 am
SDK wrote:I think the Crows are the most unprofessional, inept, poorly run club going around.
What a pathetic proposition ( or lack of ) they have put up to the SANFL. Where is that girl who designed the Power jumper maybe she could do a better job than the Crows management.
Don't they realize they are LOSING local supporters at a rate of knots ! Look at Port Adelaide's changed stance .... intelligent and very clever knowing they will not win. Port Adelaide are the winners in this debate now and have my increasing respect.
Crows are selfish and a joke and should be told in no uncertain terms to xxxx off !
I will be joining my wife and following Carlton from now on.
by Dogwatcher » Fri Jul 26, 2013 9:57 am
Booney wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Going by history I'd save my praise for Port until this thing pans out a bit more. At least until the end of 2014 and see how many Power players are moved by stealth to Port Magpies.
Agreed.
Port's decision makes them look the good guys, but, inevitably, if the Crows get what they want, by doing the heavy lifting, Port will too.
It's an interesting turn around isn't it? Port were the pariahs for ruining the SANFL in 1990. Now in the public's eye the Crows are trying to do the same in 2013, with Port looking the good guys. Well played, Port. Canny.
If the SANFL allow transfers then there is no issue, yes?
by Ronnie » Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:11 am
Agile wrote:SDK wrote:I think the Crows are the most unprofessional, inept, poorly run club going around.
What a pathetic proposition ( or lack of ) they have put up to the SANFL. Where is that girl who designed the Power jumper maybe she could do a better job than the Crows management.
Don't they realize they are LOSING local supporters at a rate of knots ! Look at Port Adelaide's changed stance .... intelligent and very clever knowing they will not win. Port Adelaide are the winners in this debate now and have my increasing respect.
Crows are selfish and a joke and should be told in no uncertain terms to xxxx off !
I will be joining my wife and following Carlton from now on.
Agrred. From here on the cows can **** off! Swans for me. First time in 50 + years I have jumped ship on anything. **** OFF COWS
by areaman » Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:13 am
daysofourlives wrote:Your only as good as your last two grand finals against the Hawks
by woodublieve12 » Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:20 am
areaman wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Your only as good as your last two grand finals against the Hawks
Completely off topic but.....
You're only as good as your last two grand finals against the Eagles
by Booney » Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:20 am
Dogwatcher wrote:Booney wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Going by history I'd save my praise for Port until this thing pans out a bit more. At least until the end of 2014 and see how many Power players are moved by stealth to Port Magpies.
Agreed.
Port's decision makes them look the good guys, but, inevitably, if the Crows get what they want, by doing the heavy lifting, Port will too.
It's an interesting turn around isn't it? Port were the pariahs for ruining the SANFL in 1990. Now in the public's eye the Crows are trying to do the same in 2013, with Port looking the good guys. Well played, Port. Canny.
If the SANFL allow transfers then there is no issue, yes?
Are you quoting Cutterman, or me?
by areaman » Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:22 am
Dogwatcher wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Going by history I'd save my praise for Port until this thing pans out a bit more. At least until the end of 2014 and see how many Power players are moved by stealth to Port Magpies.
Agreed.
Port's decision makes them look the good guys, but, inevitably, if the Crows get what they want, by doing the heavy lifting, Port will too.
It's an interesting turn around isn't it? Port were the pariahs for ruining the SANFL in 1990. Now in the public's eye the Crows are trying to do the same in 2013, with Port looking the good guys. Well played, Port. Canny.
by tipper » Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:37 am
areaman wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Going by history I'd save my praise for Port until this thing pans out a bit more. At least until the end of 2014 and see how many Power players are moved by stealth to Port Magpies.
Agreed.
Port's decision makes them look the good guys, but, inevitably, if the Crows get what they want, by doing the heavy lifting, Port will too.
It's an interesting turn around isn't it? Port were the pariahs for ruining the SANFL in 1990. Now in the public's eye the Crows are trying to do the same in 2013, with Port looking the good guys. Well played, Port. Canny.
I must have missed something along the way.
I'm struggling to see how anything Port has done makes them look good in this debate so far.
From where I sit they realise they're not going to get their way and they've gone back to regroup.
I would only praise them if they said that any plans to put a Reserves team in the SANFL is completely off the table for good.
by saintal » Fri Jul 26, 2013 12:32 pm
Ronnie wrote:Is anybody really surprised by the Crows behaviour?Agile wrote:SDK wrote:I think the Crows are the most unprofessional, inept, poorly run club going around.
What a pathetic proposition ( or lack of ) they have put up to the SANFL. Where is that girl who designed the Power jumper maybe she could do a better job than the Crows management.
Don't they realize they are LOSING local supporters at a rate of knots ! Look at Port Adelaide's changed stance .... intelligent and very clever knowing they will not win. Port Adelaide are the winners in this debate now and have my increasing respect.
Crows are selfish and a joke and should be told in no uncertain terms to xxxx off !
I will be joining my wife and following Carlton from now on.
Agrred. From here on the cows can **** off! Swans for me. First time in 50 + years I have jumped ship on anything. **** OFF COWS
The Crows have always been a fuzzy, feel good option for many South Aussies. A composite side (not a club in any sense of the word) born in haste, a 'team for all South Australians', a sort of state team in a club team competition. The fans have never had to endure a prolonged period of tough times on the field, they have a massively soft underbelly. All the time feted by an intoxicated media.
No child (Save for a rare father/son situation) can ever grow up confident of ever playing for the Crows, such is the lottery of the AFL draft system spread now across 18 clubs. A membership base with a very limited say in the running of the club. Does any of that really fit into the SANFL profile? NO
ALl i
by SDK » Fri Jul 26, 2013 1:17 pm
by beenreal » Fri Jul 26, 2013 3:31 pm
UK Fan wrote:Crows become more selfish so we put the rent up at Adelaide Oval and refuse to sell the licences.
Guess what happens next Timmy ????
by UK Fan » Fri Jul 26, 2013 3:36 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |