by CUTTERMAN » Tue Apr 05, 2011 11:02 pm
by CENTURION » Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:47 am
Mr Irate wrote:Semaphore Fish and Chip Shop Oval
by CUTTERMAN » Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:29 pm
CENTURION wrote:Mr Irate wrote:Semaphore Fish and Chip Shop Oval
Commercial Road Clap Clinic Park?
by SDK » Wed Apr 06, 2011 8:27 pm
by pipers » Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:31 pm
SDK wrote:Secret Women's business Oval ?
Gang of 49 Oval ?
by pipers » Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:33 pm
pipers wrote:SDK wrote:Secret Women's business Oval ?
Gang of 49 Oval ?
Lazy Steerotype Park
Racist Redneck **** Stadium
Where the **** are the Moderators Arena?
by CUTTERMAN » Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:46 pm
by JK » Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:48 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Okay, back on track.
Can anyone come up with a valid reason or possibility as to why a club who is apparently about to fold unless they merge with their AFL counterpart wouldn't have earned extra funds through ground naming rights? I'm puzzled!
by RustyCage » Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:51 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Okay, back on track.
Can anyone come up with a valid reason or possibility as to why a club who is apparently about to fold unless they merge with their AFL counterpart wouldn't have earned extra funds through ground naming rights? I'm puzzled!
Maybe it had something to do with the ground/club being owned by an AFL club?
by JK » Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:53 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Okay, back on track.
Can anyone come up with a valid reason or possibility as to why a club who is apparently about to fold unless they merge with their AFL counterpart wouldn't have earned extra funds through ground naming rights? I'm puzzled!
Maybe it had something to do with the ground/club being owned by an AFL club?
From memory its because the council have said naming rights isnt going to happen, won't be approved
by RustyCage » Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:56 pm
by JK » Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:59 pm
pafc1870 wrote:Thats right yes, I have no idea why, maybe they wanted to see if the magpies would even be around this season before committing to the lights? Not sure.
by CUTTERMAN » Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:01 pm
by pipers » Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:34 pm
by CENTURION » Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:05 am
pipers wrote:I dunno. Perhaps no-one wants to put their name to it???
Interesting that most clubs only get one or two years from each naming rights sponsor...
HAMRA, House Brothers, BroadRectum... so much lost tradition gone down the toilet. LOL
What do clubs generally get for flogging off the naming rights anyway? $30K ? I have no idea... does anyone know?
by Booney » Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:06 am
CENTURION wrote:pipers wrote:I dunno. Perhaps no-one wants to put their name to it???
Interesting that most clubs only get one or two years from each naming rights sponsor...
HAMRA, House Brothers, BroadRectum... so much lost tradition gone down the toilet. LOL
What do clubs generally get for flogging off the naming rights anyway? $30K ? I have no idea... does anyone know?
Hamra was 5 years, Playford will be a generation.
by CENTURION » Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:08 am
Booney wrote:CENTURION wrote:pipers wrote:I dunno. Perhaps no-one wants to put their name to it???
Interesting that most clubs only get one or two years from each naming rights sponsor...
HAMRA, House Brothers, BroadRectum... so much lost tradition gone down the toilet. LOL
What do clubs generally get for flogging off the naming rights anyway? $30K ? I have no idea... does anyone know?
Hamra was 5 years, Playford will be a generation.
Does Playford ( as a LGA ) use taxpayer money to fund the sponsorship?
by CENTURION » Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:20 am
SDK wrote:Secret Women's business Oval ?
Gang of 49 Oval ?
by RustyCage » Thu Apr 07, 2011 4:52 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Cheers mate .. BTW, whats the deal with the mayor advocating lights for the Oval, but the council only spending a comparative pittance to do up there own little area? (is that the correct story)
However, a promise by Mayor Gary Johanson to provide oval lights to help the debt-laden football club cash in on popular SANFL night games will not go ahead until Port-Enfield secures a grant from the State or Federal governments
Port-Enfield CEO Harry Wierda said the council was looking for external sources of funding to help offset the cost of lights, which could be more than $700,000.
He flagged amending the budget during the financial year if the council found a source.
“There’s no reason why lights couldn’t be done in 2011, if funding can be arranged,” he said.
by JK » Thu Apr 07, 2011 5:23 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |