SJABC wrote:Leave Westies alone. If Port got involved they'd **** up their BBQ.

Aside, I'm surprised that this far into the thread nobody has used the phrase "Bloody Port".
by Pseudo » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:10 pm
SJABC wrote:Leave Westies alone. If Port got involved they'd **** up their BBQ.
by fester69 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:49 pm
by beenreal » Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:53 am
am Bays wrote:Wedgie wrote:If you take the names of the teams out it does bring up some good points, if you discuss the teams then emotion's always going to come into it which makes it a difficult thing to discuss.
It'd be good to get a merger similar to the Wests Tigers in the NRL happening if you could bring successful elements from two different entities together.
For eg. one club with good resources, poor crowds, OK onfield performance, mediocre history and another with poor resources, great crowds and great history, or two middle of the road teams into a super club.
Might not be ideal candidates in the SANFL though.
Not the best example Wedgie, THE reason why I stopped following 'League as a Balmain supporter. Not the most fiancial club too despite the merger
by Il Duce » Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:40 am
hondo71 wrote:Why drag West Adelaide into this problem?
We don't need a dilution of supporter bases right now IMO, especially the PAM people who would surely wash their hands of the SANFL before they'd support the Western Magpies.
by Strawb » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:15 am
by CoverKing » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:18 am
Strawb07 wrote:here are the terms of the merger West Adelaide name to remain We keep our colours, jumper, nickname all port get is this West Adelaide/Port Adelaide Bloods. Like St. George and Illawarra all that is left is the Port Name nothing else.
by Strawb » Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:20 am
CoverKing wrote:Strawb07 wrote:here are the terms of the merger West Adelaide name to remain We keep our colours, jumper, nickname all port get is this West Adelaide/Port Adelaide Bloods. Like St. George and Illawarra all that is left is the Port Name nothing else.
Lets get rid of the Port name. However we will happily take the premierships with themlol
by Pseudo » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:24 am
CoverKing wrote:Strawb07 wrote:here are the terms of the merger West Adelaide name to remain We keep our colours, jumper, nickname all port get is this West Adelaide/Port Adelaide Bloods. Like St. George and Illawarra all that is left is the Port Name nothing else.
Lets get rid of the Port name. However we will happily take the premierships with themlol
by westies sarge » Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:57 pm
by Blacky » Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:52 pm
Pseudo wrote:CoverKing wrote:Strawb07 wrote:here are the terms of the merger West Adelaide name to remain We keep our colours, jumper, nickname all port get is this West Adelaide/Port Adelaide Bloods. Like St. George and Illawarra all that is left is the Port Name nothing else.
Lets get rid of the Port name. However we will happily take the premierships with themlol
If West inherits Port's premierships, does that mean the Adelaide Oval goalpost will be stuck back together?
by bosvit » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:47 pm
by Sojourner » Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:41 pm
by Zathrus » Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:56 am
bosvit wrote:I’ve been following SANFL for 30 years and in that time every team except Port (and to a lesser degree) Norwood have dropped the ball and spent their time at the bottom, shot bullets, thrown knives and detonated hand grenades. But all of them have found the guts to recover.
Are Port Adelaide that weak that at the first hurdle in living memory they are going to hoist the flag have a cry and go play with the neighbours?
by LPH » Thu Jan 07, 2010 9:41 am
beenreal wrote:Great, as if there aren't enough threads out there across a multitude of forums giving folks enough opportunity to bash the Magpies?
by NO-MERCY » Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:46 am
Zathrus wrote:
If it was just Port having a bad run on field I would just laugh and tell them to pull their heads in as all other clubs have done much much worse at times. However Ports problems are off field and thats whats going to kill them if they are not careful.
by tigerland09 » Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:26 pm
by The Yetti » Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:07 pm
by NO-MERCY » Thu Jan 07, 2010 9:52 pm
tigerland09 wrote:I couldnt care less if port folded and we had an 8 team comp. Would it still be top 5 make the finals with only 8 teams or do you think a top 4 would be better?
by goraw » Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:52 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |