Michelangelo Rucci You Were Wrong

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Michelangelo Rucci You Were Wrong

Postby Wedgie » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:49 am

You asked 2 questions mate and the answers are yes and no.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Michelangelo Rucci You Were Wrong

Postby Barto » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:51 am

To be fair to North, not one club voted for it. It's an insult that some people have suggested North swayed the rest of the clubs.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Michelangelo Rucci You Were Wrong

Postby nickname » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:53 am

on the rails wrote:
He also implied what is the SANFL going to do with another club close to the wall? Which club is he pointing the finger at - West Adelaide maybe as they had a huge loss last year but I understand they have significantly turned things around - R&B maybe can comment on that?



I don't think it would be inconsistent if the SANFL decided to help another club that was in dire straits if they had a convincing business plan with some financial modelling and a proposal that didn't offend the sensibilities of the other clubs. And if the PAMFC come up with such a plan I'm sure they will look on it as favourably as possible. The other inescapable factor at play is that with other clubs, there is the possibility of them disappearing altogether, whereas with this current example, there still remains a Port Adelaide footy club for fans to follow.
nickname
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Michelangelo Rucci You Were Wrong

Postby redandblack » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:54 am

Wedgie wrote:You asked 2 questions mate and the answers are yes and no.


Thank you, that validates the point I and many others are basing their comments on :D
redandblack
 

Re: Michelangelo Rucci You Were Wrong

Postby on the rails » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:02 am

redandblack wrote: That smacks of sour grapes and poor understanding of their role as one of 9 clubs.


There were no sour grapes on our behalf just an absolute certainty that the merger proposal was always going to be proven to be flawed and unworkable which is exactly what it was and how the other 7 clubs saw it too. So if we (the NAFC) had no understanding of our role then does that mean the other 7 NO voting clubs including yours has no understanding of their role either - we undertook all the processes as did the other clubs?

In any case you are entitled to your opinion and I don't want this to get into a stupid "he said, I said" type thread. Play on as they say.
Piss weak SANFL and the CLOWNS who run it.
on the rails
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3147
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am
Has liked: 79 times
Been liked: 83 times

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DOC and 29 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |