by Sojourner » Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:31 pm
by Wedgie » Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:43 pm
by Dutchy » Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:51 pm
by bayman » Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:58 pm
Dutchy wrote:DOnt know why its the SANFL's problem???? Sure they can give advice, but they should NEVER assist financially to just one club
by Snaggletooth Tiger » Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:05 pm
Sojourner wrote:So maybe Norwood and Wallis could go in together for the site as a win win. Norwood get to compete with the Highlander and have a club of their own and Wallis get a crack at Hoyts Tea Tree Plaza.
by Punk Rooster » Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:15 pm
Sojourner wrote:So maybe Norwood and Wallis could go in together for the site as a win win. Norwood get to compete with the Highlander and have a club of their own and Wallis get a crack at Hoyts Tea Tree Plaza.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Snaggletooth Tiger » Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:01 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:Sojourner wrote:So maybe Norwood and Wallis could go in together for the site as a win win. Norwood get to compete with the Highlander and have a club of their own and Wallis get a crack at Hoyts Tea Tree Plaza.
Never happen.
Mr Wallis is a Sturt man thru & thru.
'Aint that right Snaggletooth?
by Punk Rooster » Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:38 pm
Snaggletooth Tiger wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Sojourner wrote:So maybe Norwood and Wallis could go in together for the site as a win win. Norwood get to compete with the Highlander and have a club of their own and Wallis get a crack at Hoyts Tea Tree Plaza.
Never happen.
Mr Wallis is a Sturt man thru & thru.
'Aint that right Snaggletooth?
Spot on Punk!
But living in Glenelg's zone, played cricket for the Bay Seahorses!
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Squawk » Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Sojourner wrote:As most of you are aware the saga between the Norwood Football Club and the Highlander Hotel has been ongoing for some time, to the point where Norwood have gone from being one of the most profitable clubs to now the leagues worst performer due to lack of funds comming in. Feb 2007 sees the next round of the battle played out in the Supreme Court.
From the little that I have heard on the media it does not appear to be going well for Norwood at this stage. The Highlander Hotel has spent massive amounts of money on its redevelopment and is quite clear that they do not want the Norwood Club anywhere nearby.
Although it is not how the SANFL might operate, I think it is time that they stepped into this and got some of the problem sorted out.
My proposal would be for the SANFL to assist Norwood with a loan to purchase a hotel in their area as near as possible to the Highlander and compete directiy with them. The owners of either the Windsor or the Modbury Plaza might well sell up if made the right offer.
Another thing to consider is Wallis Cinema. They are a South Australian Company yet outside of the Piccadilly at North Adelaide do not have a Cinema in the Northern Suburbs. The last complex that they built at Mt Barker was done in conjunction with a hotel. So maybe Norwood and Wallis could go in together for the site as a win win. Norwood get to compete with the Highlander and have a club of their own and Wallis get a crack at Hoyts Tea Tree Plaza.
Surely if the SANFL, Norwood and Wallis sat down for a discussion on this and a local hotel was willing to sell up or move this could be a winner for all three of the parties?
by Barto » Thu Jan 18, 2007 12:27 am
Dutchy wrote:DOnt know why its the SANFL's problem???? Sure they can give advice, but they should NEVER assist financially to just one club
by BPBRB » Thu Jan 18, 2007 7:57 am
by topsywaldron » Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:33 am
BPBRB wrote: Norwood's current plight is a result of poor business decisions by previous boards over the years including buying the Norwood Community Club with out thinking that they could never put their own pokies in because of the legislation re pokies in shopping centres once the SAJC removed theirs.
by Dutchy » Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:35 am
Barto wrote:Dutchy wrote:DOnt know why its the SANFL's problem???? Sure they can give advice, but they should NEVER assist financially to just one club
Ironic considering your avatar there.
by Booney » Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:42 am
Dutchy wrote:Barto wrote:Dutchy wrote:DOnt know why its the SANFL's problem???? Sure they can give advice, but they should NEVER assist financially to just one club
Ironic considering your avatar there.
WTF has that got to do with the SANFL????
by BPBRB » Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:28 am
topsywaldron wrote:BPBRB wrote: Norwood's current plight is a result of poor business decisions by previous boards over the years including buying the Norwood Community Club with out thinking that they could never put their own pokies in because of the legislation re pokies in shopping centres once the SAJC removed theirs.
Two points here. For once, Drebin's 'inside information' is flat out wrong. Norwood didn't finish up operating the pokies at the NCC thanks to the monstrous duplicity on the part of a leading SAJC figure. To say that there was a conflict of interest would be an understatment of the highest order.
Secondly, buying the NCC will turn out to be the soundest investment the NFC ever made. While the return isn't as short term as its supporters would like the NCC property will turn out to be one of our saviours.
by Dutchy » Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:32 am
Booney wrote:Dutchy wrote:Barto wrote:Dutchy wrote:DOnt know why its the SANFL's problem???? Sure they can give advice, but they should NEVER assist financially to just one club
Ironic considering your avatar there.
WTF has that got to do with the SANFL????
Has farg all to do with the SANFL,but alot to do with your belief of League Administration having nothing to do with a clubs financial predicament.
by R&B Blooded » Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:05 am
BPBRB wrote:topsywaldron wrote:BPBRB wrote: Norwood's current plight is a result of poor business decisions by previous boards over the years including buying the Norwood Community Club with out thinking that they could never put their own pokies in because of the legislation re pokies in shopping centres once the SAJC removed theirs.
Two points here. For once, Drebin's 'inside information' is flat out wrong. Norwood didn't finish up operating the pokies at the NCC thanks to the monstrous duplicity on the part of a leading SAJC figure. To say that there was a conflict of interest would be an understatment of the highest order.
Secondly, buying the NCC will turn out to be the soundest investment the NFC ever made. While the return isn't as short term as its supporters would like the NCC property will turn out to be one of our saviours.
For what purpose then did the NFC buy the NCC? Apart from an asset that can be borrowed against how much income will it actually generate and is it fully leased/functional presently and if not what are the plans for it long term? Seems many people connected with the NFC can't even answer that? As for "inside" info - one of my previous bosses was a board member of the NFC who retired from the board not so long ago and with a few reds under his belt quite happily tells all and sundry about Norwoods woes past, present and future but I guess likle all clubs there are various stories doing the rounds and which one's are actually true who knows other than those curently in power?
by SimonH » Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:06 am
Stop you right there. Norwood made an application to transfer its liquor license. It was successful. It seems there's been no appeal against that decision. Norwood made an application for a pokie license (or to transfer its existing pokie license, take your pick). It was successful. The Highlander has appealed. No idea how that translates to 'does not appear to be going well for Norwood', other than the obvious fact that Norwood would like to see the appeal decided in its favour ASAP.Sojourner wrote:As most of you are aware the saga between the Norwood Football Club and the Highlander Hotel has been ongoing for some time, to the point where Norwood have gone from being one of the most profitable clubs to now the leagues worst performer due to lack of funds comming in. Feb 2007 sees the next round of the battle played out in the Supreme Court.
From the little that I have heard on the media it does not appear to be going well for Norwood at this stage. The Highlander Hotel has spent massive amounts of money on its redevelopment and is quite clear that they do not want the Norwood Club anywhere nearby.
That's only a good idea if you want to see this drag out in the courts as long as humanly possible. New site = new liquor license application plus new pokie application. All of the evidence has to be prepared again, two hearings conducted again, two new decisions made, following which two sets of rights of appeal kick in again. Big step backwards.Sojourner wrote:My proposal would be for the SANFL to assist Norwood with a loan to purchase a hotel in their area as near as possible to the Highlander and compete directiy with them. The owners of either the Windsor or the Modbury Plaza might well sell up if made the right offer.
That isn't so surprising, as appeals from pokie-granting decisions aren't made to the Supreme Court. They're made to the Licensing Court of SA. There is no further right of appeal after that.Squawk wrote:The Supreme Court Civil Registry does not currently have a listing for the Highlander or Norwood parties. I confirmed this only last week when I spoke to someone there specifically about this matter.
by topsywaldron » Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:16 am
BPBRB wrote:For what purpose then did the NFC buy the NCC? Apart from an asset that can be borrowed against how much income will it actually generate and is it fully leased/functional presently and if not what are the plans for it long term? Seems many people connected with the NFC can't even answer that?
BPBRB wrote:As for "inside" info - one of my previous bosses was a board member of the NFC who retired from the board not so long ago and with a few reds under his belt quite happily tells all and sundry about Norwoods woes past, present and future but I guess likle all clubs there are various stories doing the rounds and which one's are actually true who knows other than those curently in power?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |