Dutchy wrote:Maybe it was resign or be sacked?
Considering he orchestrated the AFL clubs into the SANFL without the knowledge and agreement of the Commission or League Directors, it is entirely possible
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jul 23, 2014 6:51 pm
Dutchy wrote:Maybe it was resign or be sacked?
by Bounce of the ball » Wed Jul 23, 2014 7:30 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Haters will hate but he is a very big loss to the future of the SANFL.
Disappointed is all I'll say
by matt1 » Wed Jul 23, 2014 8:09 pm
Bounce of the ball wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Haters will hate but he is a very big loss to the future of the SANFL.
Disappointed is all I'll say
Why if you say he is a backstabber ??(as per above)
Jimmy_041 wrote:Dutchy wrote:Maybe it was resign or be sacked?
Considering he orchestrated the AFL clubs into the SANFL without the knowledge and agreement of the Commission or League Directors, it is entirely possible
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jul 23, 2014 8:40 pm
Bounce of the ball wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Haters will hate but he is a very big loss to the future of the SANFL.
Disappointed is all I'll say
Why if you say he is a backstabber ??(as per above)
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jul 23, 2014 8:43 pm
matt1 wrote:Bounce of the ball wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Haters will hate but he is a very big loss to the future of the SANFL.
Disappointed is all I'll say
Why if you say he is a backstabber ??(as per above)Jimmy_041 wrote:Dutchy wrote:Maybe it was resign or be sacked?
Considering he orchestrated the AFL clubs into the SANFL without the knowledge and agreement of the Commission or League Directors, it is entirely possible
Think Jimmy may be pointing out that the Commission and League Directors need to shoulder the blame, not the person paid to implement it............
If he got that through without the Commission and League Directors knowing what they were voting on he is a genius!
by LPH » Wed Jul 23, 2014 8:52 pm
by klaan » Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:13 pm
LPH wrote:I don't know the man, so I'm not prepared to 'bag him'.
That said, I don't think it is inappropriate to suggest that 'on his watch', he has overseen the biggest upheaval in the SANFL since 1990.
It would also be prevalent to note that by his 'rubber stamp' of AFL Reserves Teams in the competition, has indeed alienated many core supporters & contributed significantly to loss of revenue for Clubs both through Membership numbers & Attendance figures.
I wish him well but can't say I'm sorry to see him go.
Now if we can just see the other 7 CEOs go the same way...
by whufc » Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:16 pm
klaan wrote:LPH wrote:I don't know the man, so I'm not prepared to 'bag him'.
That said, I don't think it is inappropriate to suggest that 'on his watch', he has overseen the biggest upheaval in the SANFL since 1990.
It would also be prevalent to note that by his 'rubber stamp' of AFL Reserves Teams in the competition, has indeed alienated many core supporters & contributed significantly to loss of revenue for Clubs both through Membership numbers & Attendance figures.
I wish him well but can't say I'm sorry to see him go.
Now if we can just see the other 7 CEOs go the same way...
Teenage rejoinder alert. Some balance please; whether we like it or nor, the SANFL Clubs do receive an extra $100,000 per year from the AFL Clubs being in the competition. If crowds and membership numbers drop significantly, I'll absolutely agree with you LPH and it should be seen to have happened under his watch.
Hey Topsy - how is Joe? Enjoying the extra work from his puppet master?
by Wedgie » Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:27 pm
by dedja » Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:32 pm
LPH wrote:I don't know the man, so I'm not prepared to 'bag him'.
That said, I don't think it is inappropriate to suggest that 'on his watch', he has overseen the biggest upheaval in the SANFL since 1990.
It would also be prevalent to note that by his 'rubber stamp' of AFL Reserves Teams in the competition, has indeed alienated many core supporters & contributed significantly to loss of revenue for Clubs both through Membership numbers & Attendance figures.
I wish him well but can't say I'm sorry to see him go.
Now if we can just see the other 7 CEOs go the same way...
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:35 pm
by LPH » Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:39 pm
by topsywaldron » Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:58 pm
smac wrote:Alienating your core audience shouldn't be a deliberate move.
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:09 pm
topsywaldron wrote:smac wrote:Alienating your core audience shouldn't be a deliberate move.
We have a winner ladies and gents.
by Big Phil » Thu Jul 24, 2014 7:10 am
by UK Fan » Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:53 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:topsywaldron wrote:smac wrote:Alienating your core audience shouldn't be a deliberate move.
We have a winner ladies and gents.
Bloody stupid of the clubs to do it then
Maybe Joe should have put us ahead of Gordon Prickards money
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Dogwatcher » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:27 am
by am Bays » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:41 am
Dogwatcher wrote:Whatever your thoughts, it would not be an easy job.
I also have a inkling of someone who may be very interested in the position...
by LPH » Thu Jul 24, 2014 11:16 am
by Dogwatcher » Thu Jul 24, 2014 11:20 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |