by LPH » Wed Dec 10, 2014 7:16 pm
by kickinit » Wed Dec 10, 2014 8:37 pm
LPH wrote:Port supporters questioning financial handouts & 'helping hands' given to other Clubs?
Interesting...
by Special One » Thu Dec 11, 2014 2:13 am
by DOC » Thu Dec 11, 2014 6:29 am
kickinit wrote:LPH wrote:Port supporters questioning financial handouts & 'helping hands' given to other Clubs?
Interesting...
Everyone is on the the front foot when it us, so why shouldn't we be able to. My stance is the SANFL should have been helping all the clubs out a lot more then they have. The SANFL have made many millions out of SA football and the only club that is doing half decent is a club that is getting headquarters rent free.
by kickinit » Thu Dec 11, 2014 6:37 am
DOC wrote:kickinit wrote:LPH wrote:Port supporters questioning financial handouts & 'helping hands' given to other Clubs?
Interesting...
Everyone is on the the front foot when it us, so why shouldn't we be able to. My stance is the SANFL should have been helping all the clubs out a lot more then they have. The SANFL have made many millions out of SA football and the only club that is doing half decent is a club that is getting headquarters rent free.
You are quite right.
If they had not been pouring money down the throat of Port they would have been in a position to.
by johntheclaret » Thu Dec 11, 2014 7:03 am
kickinit wrote:LPH wrote:Port supporters questioning financial handouts & 'helping hands' given to other Clubs?
Interesting...
Everyone is on the the front foot when it us, so why shouldn't we be able to. My stance is the SANFL should have been helping all the clubs out a lot more then they have. The SANFL have made many millions out of SA football and the only club that is doing half decent is a club that is getting headquarters rent free.
by johntheclaret » Thu Dec 11, 2014 7:07 am
kickinit wrote:DOC wrote:kickinit wrote:LPH wrote:Port supporters questioning financial handouts & 'helping hands' given to other Clubs?
Interesting...
Everyone is on the the front foot when it us, so why shouldn't we be able to. My stance is the SANFL should have been helping all the clubs out a lot more then they have. The SANFL have made many millions out of SA football and the only club that is doing half decent is a club that is getting headquarters rent free.
You are quite right.
If they had not been pouring money down the throat of Port they would have been in a position to.
That's a load of crap. They had a stadium which was sponsored and which they were making millions from. $70m from the land sale and the clubs aren't going to see a cent? The SANFL have a lot to answer to why football in this state is in such a bad state.
by stan » Thu Dec 11, 2014 7:42 am
johntheclaret wrote:kickinit wrote:DOC wrote:kickinit wrote:[quote="LPH"]Port supporters questioning financial handouts & 'helping hands' given to other Clubs?
Interesting...
Everyone is on the the front foot when it us, so why shouldn't we be able to. My stance is the SANFL should have been helping all the clubs out a lot more then they have. The SANFL have made many millions out of SA football and the only club that is doing half decent is a club that is getting headquarters rent free.
You are quite right.
If they had not been pouring money down the throat of Port they would have been in a position to.
That's a load of crap. They had a stadium which was sponsored and which they were making millions from. $70m from the land sale and the clubs aren't going to see a cent? The SANFL have a lot to answer to why football in this state is in such a bad state.
by Booney » Thu Dec 11, 2014 8:21 am
LPH wrote:Port supporters questioning financial handouts & 'helping hands' given to other Clubs?
Interesting...
by Booney » Thu Dec 11, 2014 8:22 am
johntheclaret wrote:kickinit wrote:LPH wrote:Port supporters questioning financial handouts & 'helping hands' given to other Clubs?
Interesting...
Everyone is on the the front foot when it us, so why shouldn't we be able to. My stance is the SANFL should have been helping all the clubs out a lot more then they have. The SANFL have made many millions out of SA football and the only club that is doing half decent is a club that is getting headquarters rent free.
I didn't realise South received $16.5m in handouts from the SANFL
by stan » Thu Dec 11, 2014 8:30 am
Booney wrote:johntheclaret wrote:kickinit wrote:LPH wrote:Port supporters questioning financial handouts & 'helping hands' given to other Clubs?
Interesting...
Everyone is on the the front foot when it us, so why shouldn't we be able to. My stance is the SANFL should have been helping all the clubs out a lot more then they have. The SANFL have made many millions out of SA football and the only club that is doing half decent is a club that is getting headquarters rent free.
I didn't realise South received $16.5m in handouts from the SANFL
See my comment above, John boy.
Surely one conversation can be conducted without it being made all about another?
by LPH » Thu Dec 11, 2014 11:23 am
by Booney » Thu Dec 11, 2014 12:01 pm
by o five » Thu Dec 11, 2014 3:38 pm
by JohnnyG » Thu Dec 11, 2014 8:46 pm
o five wrote:Their all lying pigs who I would not trust.
by Bounce of the ball » Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:49 pm
by Rik E Boy » Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:48 pm
by johntheclaret » Fri Dec 12, 2014 6:33 pm
Booney wrote:johntheclaret wrote:kickinit wrote:LPH wrote:Port supporters questioning financial handouts & 'helping hands' given to other Clubs?
Interesting...
Everyone is on the the front foot when it us, so why shouldn't we be able to. My stance is the SANFL should have been helping all the clubs out a lot more then they have. The SANFL have made many millions out of SA football and the only club that is doing half decent is a club that is getting headquarters rent free.
I didn't realise South received $16.5m in handouts from the SANFL
See my comment above, John boy.
Surely one conversation can be conducted without it being made all about another?
by kickinit » Fri Dec 12, 2014 6:45 pm
Bounce of the ball wrote:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/messenger/north-northeast/central-district-bulldogs-call-for-fans-to-back-the-club-to-avoid-cuts-to-junior-programs/story-fni9ll1r-1227150954316
It was all fine when they were winning and that amazing dynasty has actually done harm. I also think that Centrals may not have planned ahead very well as it was always going to end.
by Special One » Fri Dec 12, 2014 6:59 pm
kickinit wrote:Bounce of the ball wrote:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/messenger/north-northeast/central-district-bulldogs-call-for-fans-to-back-the-club-to-avoid-cuts-to-junior-programs/story-fni9ll1r-1227150954316
It was all fine when they were winning and that amazing dynasty has actually done harm. I also think that Centrals may not have planned ahead very well as it was always going to end.
You also have to consider the area they are in. A lot of people in that area would work for Holden or someone who does work for them. Tough times a head out there, I only expect centrals situation to get worse.
Is it time for the SANFl to drop the Jnr's and we have a separate Jnr's program?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |