by Mr Beefy » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:42 am
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:46 am
by Booney » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:48 am
Dogwatcher wrote:FFS.
But really? Lads?
But really? Why do we care?
They're stupid for sending. The public who want to know this crap are stupid.
Stupid, stupid, stupid.
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:50 am
by Booney » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:51 am
Dogwatcher wrote:It's a whole soup of stupid.
by Footy Chick » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:53 am
Dogwatcher wrote:Cloke and Swan are a whole soup of stupid.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Magellan » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:56 am
by Q. » Mon Jan 18, 2016 9:34 am
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jan 18, 2016 9:42 am
by JK » Mon Jan 18, 2016 9:58 am
by Booney » Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:01 am
JK wrote:So Cloke's gone the choke and upset a few folk .. Seriously who cares
by Magellan » Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:20 am
Q. wrote:I expect the feminists to come out any minute now and denounce the actions of this woman.
by am Bays » Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:43 am
Booney wrote:JK wrote:So Cloke's gone the choke and upset a few folk .. Seriously who cares
Silly bloke.
by Q. » Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:45 am
am Bays wrote:Booney wrote:JK wrote:So Cloke's gone the choke and upset a few folk .. Seriously who cares
Silly bloke.
I bet Josh Bootsma cares.....
Will Collingwood follow Carltons precedent and sack them???
Or will it be different because they're guns and Bootsma was....
by Q. » Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:47 am
by Mr Beefy » Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:52 am
Collingwood have released a statement in relation to leaked nude pictures of Dane Swan and Travis Cloke.
"The club is aware three currently listed players were involved in consensual exchanges of messages + pictures via Instagram," Collingwood tweeted.
"The exchanges have been on sale to media outlets for some time + as a result have been obtained + published by a media publication."
"At this point, the club will not take any action as it considers this a private matter for the player."
by am Bays » Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:53 am
Q. wrote:It's interesting that none of the TV networks wanted a bar of the photos and that they've ended up in some trash mag.
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:55 am
am Bays wrote:Q. wrote:It's interesting that none of the TV networks wanted a bar of the photos and that they've ended up in some trash mag.
Ed wouldn't have anything to do with that would he....
by Magellan » Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:56 am
Q. wrote:It's interesting that none of the TV networks wanted a bar of the photos
by Q. » Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:57 am
Magellan wrote:Q. wrote:It's interesting that none of the TV networks wanted a bar of the photos
Pun hopefully intended.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |