Footy Smart wrote:mumford to GWS for 3rd rounder.... bargain!
they reckon GWS set to offload pick 2. you would think they have a decent player lined up?
Who is they?
by The Sleeping Giant » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:49 pm
Footy Smart wrote:mumford to GWS for 3rd rounder.... bargain!
they reckon GWS set to offload pick 2. you would think they have a decent player lined up?
by bennymacca » Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:51 pm
Footy Smart wrote:[
Na they still think Taylor Adams for Heater
by Q. » Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:00 pm
bennymacca wrote:Footy Smart wrote:[
Na they still think Taylor Adams for Heater
they want more out of that deal than just heater, thats the sticking point apparently
by the wonder elephant » Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:02 pm
by daysofourlives » Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:11 pm
Q. wrote:bennymacca wrote:Footy Smart wrote:[
Na they still think Taylor Adams for Heater
they want more out of that deal than just heater, thats the sticking point apparently
No, the sticking point is that Collingwood should get more than just Taylor Adams for a proven gun being offered $750K a year to play. In the end I think it will just be player for player unfortunately.
by Jim05 » Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:12 pm
the wonder elephant wrote:Bernie Vince to Melbourne for pick 23 .... good luck Melbourne keeping him out of the nightclubs
by Q. » Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:23 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Q. wrote:bennymacca wrote:Footy Smart wrote:[
Na they still think Taylor Adams for Heater
they want more out of that deal than just heater, thats the sticking point apparently
No, the sticking point is that Collingwood should get more than just Taylor Adams for a proven gun being offered $750K a year to play. In the end I think it will just be player for player unfortunately.
What would you know Q, you think Hogan is a midfielder
by bennymacca » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:19 am
Q. wrote:bennymacca wrote:Footy Smart wrote:[
Na they still think Taylor Adams for Heater
they want more out of that deal than just heater, thats the sticking point apparently
No, the sticking point is that Collingwood should get more than just Taylor Adams for a proven gun being offered $750K a year to play. In the end I think it will just be player for player unfortunately.
by Jim05 » Sat Oct 19, 2013 8:01 am
bennymacca wrote:Q. wrote:bennymacca wrote:Footy Smart wrote:[
Na they still think Taylor Adams for Heater
they want more out of that deal than just heater, thats the sticking point apparently
No, the sticking point is that Collingwood should get more than just Taylor Adams for a proven gun being offered $750K a year to play. In the end I think it will just be player for player unfortunately.
No way will shaw be on 750. And maybe you should go read a bit, because gws definitely want more than just shaw for Adams
by Q. » Sat Oct 19, 2013 10:29 am
by bennymacca » Sat Oct 19, 2013 10:36 am
Q. wrote:GWS are bluffing. They already announced Shaw as a signing, and they desperately need an experienced player. They will look like giant fools if they don't seal this, and lose Adams anyway.
by Q. » Sat Oct 19, 2013 10:40 am
bennymacca wrote:Q. wrote:GWS are bluffing. They already announced Shaw as a signing, and they desperately need an experienced player. They will look like giant fools if they don't seal this, and lose Adams anyway.
decent pun there, WP
and yeah i agree i think it might include a swap for minor picks, like collingwood's second for the giants third or something. the thing is collingwood dont exactly have much bargaining power anyway.
by Jim05 » Sat Oct 19, 2013 10:47 am
Q. wrote:bennymacca wrote:Q. wrote:GWS are bluffing. They already announced Shaw as a signing, and they desperately need an experienced player. They will look like giant fools if they don't seal this, and lose Adams anyway.
decent pun there, WP
and yeah i agree i think it might include a swap for minor picks, like collingwood's second for the giants third or something. the thing is collingwood dont exactly have much bargaining power anyway.
Except for the fact that Shaw is contracted and they don't have to trade.
After getting shafted on the Buddy deal, GWS need this deal and Silvagni is being a flog about it.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Oct 19, 2013 11:11 am
Q. wrote:bennymacca wrote:Q. wrote:GWS are bluffing. They already announced Shaw as a signing, and they desperately need an experienced player. They will look like giant fools if they don't seal this, and lose Adams anyway.
decent pun there, WP
and yeah i agree i think it might include a swap for minor picks, like collingwood's second for the giants third or something. the thing is collingwood dont exactly have much bargaining power anyway.
Except for the fact that Shaw is contracted and they don't have to trade.
After getting shafted on the Buddy deal, GWS need this deal and Silvagni is being a flog about it.
by Q. » Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:23 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Q. wrote:bennymacca wrote:Q. wrote:GWS are bluffing. They already announced Shaw as a signing, and they desperately need an experienced player. They will look like giant fools if they don't seal this, and lose Adams anyway.
decent pun there, WP
and yeah i agree i think it might include a swap for minor picks, like collingwood's second for the giants third or something. the thing is collingwood dont exactly have much bargaining power anyway.
Except for the fact that Shaw is contracted and they don't have to trade.
After getting shafted on the Buddy deal, GWS need this deal and Silvagni is being a flog about it.
Oh dear. Still 5 days of trading to go. God forbid Silvagni trying to get some value for his team. GWS are in the box seat. Shaw doesn't want to be at Collingwood, Buckley doesn't want Shaw, Gws can also deal with Geelong.
Who is being the flog?
by Jim05 » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:30 pm
Q. wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Q. wrote:bennymacca wrote:[quote="Q."]GWS are bluffing. They already announced Shaw as a signing, and they desperately need an experienced player. They will look like giant fools if they don't seal this, and lose Adams anyway.
decent pun there, WP
and yeah i agree i think it might include a swap for minor picks, like collingwood's second for the giants third or something. the thing is collingwood dont exactly have much bargaining power anyway.
Except for the fact that Shaw is contracted and they don't have to trade.
After getting shafted on the Buddy deal, GWS need this deal and Silvagni is being a flog about it.
Oh dear. Still 5 days of trading to go. God forbid Silvagni trying to get some value for his team. GWS are in the box seat. Shaw doesn't want to be at Collingwood, Buckley doesn't want Shaw, Gws can also deal with Geelong.
Who is being the flog?
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Oct 19, 2013 3:00 pm
Q. wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Oh dear. Still 5 days of trading to go. God forbid Silvagni trying to get some value for his team. GWS are in the box seat. Shaw doesn't want to be at Collingwood, Buckley doesn't want Shaw, Gws can also deal with Geelong.
Who is being the flog?
GWS want a premiership player on a five year $3.5mil deal and want to trade an unproven rookie for him AND want one of Collingwood's picks. Yeah right.
They need Shaw way more than we need Adams.
by Q. » Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:24 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Q. wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Oh dear. Still 5 days of trading to go. God forbid Silvagni trying to get some value for his team. GWS are in the box seat. Shaw doesn't want to be at Collingwood, Buckley doesn't want Shaw, Gws can also deal with Geelong.
Who is being the flog?
GWS want a premiership player on a five year $3.5mil deal and want to trade an unproven rookie for him AND want one of Collingwood's picks. Yeah right.
They need Shaw way more than we need Adams.
I thought you would understand market forces. Adams wanted by many. Shaw wanted by few.
It isn't as simple as here is this players stats and achievements, here is the other guys.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:26 pm
by stan » Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:56 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |