by Footy Smart » Fri Nov 01, 2013 3:42 pm
by Rik E Boy » Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:05 pm
by Punk Rooster » Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:28 pm
Turbo wrote:Reckon the afl would love to see st Kilda relocate. Maybe the first NZ team??
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by dedja » Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:41 pm
by Jim05 » Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:06 pm
by Turbo » Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:10 pm
Jim05 wrote:Gee what a shock that another club surviving on AFL handouts can find the money to pay out a coach, $400-450k handout coming their way.
Im glad our fine is being put to good use
by dedja » Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:11 pm
by Jim05 » Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:35 pm
dedja wrote:That's actually a reasonable point. In Melbourne's case they needed the financial assurance of the AFL in order to sack Neeld.
Just watched a reply of the press conference. Lord help The Saints with that muppet as president.
by woodublieve12 » Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:12 pm
by Turbo » Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:06 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:So clubs who scab of the afl is acceptable but a club who manages it's list very well and works within the rules is a disgrace!!! Anyways, go swans in 2014
by gadj1976 » Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:35 pm
by daysofourlives » Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:51 pm
Turbo wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:So clubs who scab of the afl is acceptable but a club who manages it's list very well and works within the rules is a disgrace!!! Anyways, go swans in 2014
The swans do scab. COLA!
by daysofourlives » Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:54 pm
Jim05 wrote:dedja wrote:That's actually a reasonable point. In Melbourne's case they needed the financial assurance of the AFL in order to sack Neeld.
Just watched a reply of the press conference. Lord help The Saints with that muppet as president.
Melbourne, Brisbane and the Saints all got a decent handout from the AFL this year. Im all for struggling clubs being helped out but not to finance sacking a coach mid contract.
When clubs are in financial trouble the last thing they should be doing is paying out huge sums of money. Will the AFL also pay Chocco's wage they have done with Roos?
by daysofourlives » Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:57 pm
by gadj1976 » Sat Nov 02, 2013 12:23 am
daysofourlives wrote:Jim05 wrote:dedja wrote:That's actually a reasonable point. In Melbourne's case they needed the financial assurance of the AFL in order to sack Neeld.
Just watched a reply of the press conference. Lord help The Saints with that muppet as president.
Melbourne, Brisbane and the Saints all got a decent handout from the AFL this year. Im all for struggling clubs being helped out but not to finance sacking a coach mid contract.
When clubs are in financial trouble the last thing they should be doing is paying out huge sums of money. Will the AFL also pay Chocco's wage they have done with Roos?
Why shouldnt the AFL fund a new coach or the paying out of one mid contract if it is going to do more harm than good to keep them. is alot cheaper for the AFL in the long run.
by Jim05 » Sat Nov 02, 2013 8:49 am
daysofourlives wrote:
Why shouldnt the AFL fund a new coach or the paying out of one mid contract if it is going to do more harm than good to keep them. is alot cheaper for the AFL in the long run.
by NO-MERCY » Sat Nov 02, 2013 9:01 am
by dedja » Sat Nov 02, 2013 9:04 am
by Ron Burgundy » Sat Nov 02, 2013 9:25 am
by dedja » Sat Nov 02, 2013 9:31 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |