MW wrote:10 disposals, no goals, no hitouts. Trengrove would have given you better output and may have swayed the result.
What was it? Crows supporters that are more worried about Port than their own team... says more about the supporter
MW wrote:10 disposals, no goals, no hitouts. Trengrove would have given you better output and may have swayed the result.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
The Bedge wrote:MW wrote:10 disposals, no goals, no hitouts. Trengrove would have given you better output and may have swayed the result.
What was it? Crows supporters that are more worried about Port than their own team... says more about the supporter
MW wrote:The Bedge wrote:MW wrote:10 disposals, no goals, no hitouts. Trengrove would have given you better output and may have swayed the result.
What was it? Crows supporters that are more worried about Port than their own team... says more about the supporter
What?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
MW wrote:10 disposals, no goals, no hitouts. Trengrove would have given you better output and may have swayed the result.
The Bedge wrote:MW wrote:The Bedge wrote:MW wrote:10 disposals, no goals, no hitouts. Trengrove would have given you better output and may have swayed the result.
What was it? Crows supporters that are more worried about Port than their own team... says more about the supporter
What?
I'm sure it was your post a couple Mondays ago when there was discussion about how Port had handled the departures compared to Adelaide and you didn't hold back talking about Port constantly being more worried about what the Crows are doing (or along those lines).
Yet you post in here ragging on Port more than most
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
MW wrote:10 disposals, no goals, no hitouts. Trengrove would have given you better output and may have swayed the result.
amber_fluid wrote:
You guys are getting mixed up with the Boak who played in 2013 and 2014 who had some leg speed(was never quick though) and used the ball well.
This Boak is too slow to play as an outside mid and his disposal is not what it use to be.
He might be playing off the bench for most of the year I’d say.
morell wrote:MW wrote:10 disposals, no goals, no hitouts. Trengrove would have given you better output and may have swayed the result.
Could've done more, and needed to limit McGovern, but I very much doubt Trengove would have been the difference.
Of those 10 disposals 3 were very clever and resulted in goals. He played his role structurally which enabled Dixon to run riot. If you want to measure Marshall, measure Dixon at the same time.
Plus, and perhaps most importantly in my books, a young tall forward got to experience a cut throat final.
Booney wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Dear Kenny
Please recruit Watts and hinder the progress of a promsing young forward.
Now, now...while I think Marshall has a bright future ahead of him I'm a little reluctant to throw him in the deep in for a full season of playing a key position in his current physical form. I'd have him in my plans for 2018, but I'd also have him playing 60 or 70% of the games. He's completely different to SPP, Wines and co. who can come in and play full seasons in their first year, we need to be mindful of managing him early.
Booney wrote:Selection in that match can't be questioned. After the siren after extra time loss when we dominated play, execution can be questioned but not selection.
If we'd lost by 8 goals, question selection.
Dutchy wrote:Will Port even attend the draft?
valleys07 wrote:Dutchy wrote:Will Port even attend the draft?
Why wouldn't we?
2 of our recruits thus far are Restricted Free Agents.
Users browsing this forum: gadj1976 and 183 guests