Page 18 of 23
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 3:57 pm
by Rik E Boy
The Dark Knight wrote:JK wrote:Luke Darcy: "It's either a 50 (metre penalty) or it's not"
LOL, all those years of experience paying off.
Hahaha hilarious!
I liked Matthew Richardson's comment, can't remember it word for word but it was something along the lines of- "If the Crows can get through the Bulldogs press they can score". Wow, no f**king shit mate, the object of the game is to get through/past the opposition then score more goal/points than they do.
I can top that with "Lambert took a year off Footy working in a factory stacking cans to build up his strength" LMAO Hamish you bell end. Maybe he had to pay the rent!
regards,
REB
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 3:59 pm
by another grub
How weak was that Hanson
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 3:59 pm
by Rik E Boy
TYRONE! Hansen left grasping thin air. Brilliant goal!
regards,
REB
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 3:59 pm
by helicopterking
If Vickery does that to you, you need to have a good hard look at yourself.
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:05 pm
by another grub
North made their run, made a prelim last year. There finished
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:11 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
Wow....how boring does Bruce sound when the Hawks aren't involved??
its 15points and apparently game over but on friday night the hawks were 50 down but allegedly there was a sense they could win....
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:15 pm
by HH3
another grub wrote:North made their run, made a prelim last year. There finished
I beg your pardon?
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:20 pm
by HH3
Wow! These umpires are spuds.
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:22 pm
by Q.
That Garner goes alright.
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:23 pm
by Spargo
Richmond 5 goals from free kicks
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:25 pm
by carey
Spargo wrote:Richmond 5 goals from free kicks
4 of them were there tho
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:25 pm
by helicopterking
Maric gets a free kick for exactly the same thing that happened in the Roos forward line just 20 secs earlier that wasn't called.
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:26 pm
by another grub
Furrito what a spud
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:26 pm
by Spargo
Spargo wrote:Richmond 5 goals from free kicks
Make it 6 after a blatant push to Higgins down the other end wasn't paid.
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:26 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
Wowee
the AFL want Richmond to continue in the finals
the umpiring is horrid
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:27 pm
by another grub
Umps ruining a good game
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:29 pm
by carey
Frees are 11 a piece. Or did the umpires kick The Roos 8 behinds?
Umpiring hasn't been great but it's certainly not the difference between the 2 sides. It's been a great contest thus far
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:31 pm
by Spargo
carey wrote:Frees are 11 a piece. Or did the umpires kick The Roos 8 behinds?
Umpiring hasn't been great but it's certainly not the difference between the 2 sides. It's been a great contest thus far
Pay free kicks for both teams for the same infringements and I'll shut up.
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:31 pm
by Q.
carey wrote:Frees are 11 a piece. Or did the umpires kick The Roos 8 behinds?
Umpiring hasn't been great but it's certainly not the difference between the 2 sides. It's been a great contest thus far
I guess the difference is that North aren't getting them inside 50
Re: Week 1, 2015 AFL Finals Series
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2015 4:31 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
But its where the frees are paid
that 50m penalty that resulted in a goal was an umpiring blunder