Booney wrote:Adelaide Oval was $535m then $555m ended up around $610m.
We would spend twice that knowing what it has done for the city and the state.
Build it and they will come.
Difference is $1.3 Billion for 26,000 people and no cricket.
Other than 11 home games what else would they fill it will. International artists are not going there, might jag a soccer international but nothing else.
AO has two tenants, gets used every week of the home & away season, plus you've got the hotel there now too
That was my point
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
Booney wrote:Adelaide Oval was $535m then $555m ended up around $610m.
We would spend twice that knowing what it has done for the city and the state.
Build it and they will come.
Different situations though. AO is used every week in footy season and our test matches continue to smash records The Hobart ground will host about 7-8 AFL games per year and no tests. Will most likely blow out $$1.2bn and for a state that is broke and predicted to have a $10bn debt in this decade I can see why alarm bells are ringing
The Tasmanian Labor leader has just stated both parties are fully behind it and nothing will change in regards to stadium timeframe regardless of who wins this current election drama
Jim05 wrote:The Tasmanian Labor leader has just stated both parties are fully behind it and nothing will change in regards to stadium timeframe regardless of who wins this current election drama
But he didn’t say it will be the current stadium but a stadium
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
Jim05 wrote:The Tasmanian Labor leader has just stated both parties are fully behind it and nothing will change in regards to stadium timeframe regardless of who wins this current election drama
But he didn’t say it will be the current stadium but a stadium
They won’t get a team then. AFL won’t cave in on this
Why is it only a 26000 seated stadium? Build it and they will come.. 26000 is a disgrace. Needs to be double that to attract other major events and concerts.
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Why is it only a 26000 seated stadium? Build it and they will come.. 26000 is a disgrace. Needs to be double that to attract other major events and concerts.
They’re going to get 10% of their population to each match?
If that was the going rate, Adelaide Oval needs to be upgraded to hold 150,000
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Why is it only a 26000 seated stadium? Build it and they will come.. 26000 is a disgrace. Needs to be double that to attract other major events and concerts.
They’re going to get 10% of their population to each match?
If that was the going rate, Adelaide Oval needs to be upgraded to hold 150,000
Yep.
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
dedja wrote:Plus 250K population compared to 1.5M here
Very different set up too, Adelaide metro is dense and central, Hobart is kind of isolated as Tassie is made up of a lot of smaller cities with nothing in between them.
TAS Parliament has called it a day. 19 of the 35 MPs have had 20 mins each to speak to the no confidence motion, so the remaining 16 will continue tomorrow.
You would think that only the leaders of each party would state their case, but here we are.
Nobody wants to sit out in sideways rain and hail when it's -1. No crowds no devils. So a 23000 seat stadium with a roof might guarantee a decent return rather than 5000 a week maybe
tigerpie wrote:Nobody wants to sit out in sideways rain and hail when it's -1. No crowds no devils. So a 23000 seat stadium with a roof might guarantee a decent return rather than 5000 a week maybe
The 18,000 difference won’t repay the $billion loan anytime soon though That’s the problem
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
tigerpie wrote:Nobody wants to sit out in sideways rain and hail when it's -1. No crowds no devils. So a 23000 seat stadium with a roof might guarantee a decent return rather than 5000 a week maybe
The 18,000 difference won’t repay the $billion loan anytime soon though That’s the problem
tigerpie wrote:Nobody wants to sit out in sideways rain and hail when it's -1. No crowds no devils. So a 23000 seat stadium with a roof might guarantee a decent return rather than 5000 a week maybe
The 18,000 difference won’t repay the $billion loan anytime soon though That’s the problem
A few big rock concerts could help massively.
Hobart is the second driest capital city in Australia. It’s warmer and drier in winter than Canberra and the AFL plays night games there. Forget that logic.
North Hobart Oval should be rejuvenated similar to Adelaide Oval. Fantastic location (unlike Bellerive) and it also holds significant historical significance to Tasmanian Football.
Last edited by LaughingKookaburra on Wed Jun 04, 2025 8:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Can you bring a man to his feet when defeat is on repeat?