
by LBT » Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:15 am
by youngster » Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:01 pm
by Jimmy » Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:12 pm
by godoubleblues » Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:18 pm
by smithy » Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:33 pm
by LBT » Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:35 pm
smithy wrote:Coming from North it would have to be for the love of the jumper.
by Bluedemon » Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:37 pm
by drebin » Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:33 pm
smithy wrote:Coming from North it would have to be for the love of the jumper.
by CUTTERMAN » Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:13 pm
by Punk Rooster » Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:41 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by the joker » Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:36 pm
by Ian » Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:59 pm
by bayman » Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:18 pm
by Punk Rooster » Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:37 pm
the joker wrote:Lets be serious he didnt leave to try get in the midfield more.
He wanted More Money and roosters wouldnt give him the money they wanted
thats one reason the roosters are in such a good state of the field. unlike sturt
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Jimmy » Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:10 am
the joker wrote:thats one reason the roosters are in such a good state of the field. unlike sturt
by Punk Rooster » Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:32 am
Jimmy wrote:the joker wrote:thats one reason the roosters are in such a good state of the field. unlike sturt
LMFAO!!!!!!!:D:D
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Jimmy » Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:46 am
Punk Rooster wrote:Jimmy wrote:the joker wrote:thats one reason the roosters are in such a good state of the field. unlike sturt
LMFAO!!!!!!!:D:D
what's with the laughter Jim-bob?
Financially we would be streets ahead of Strut...
by the joker » Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:49 am
it is a little bit jokular. but they could be in a better spot.Jimmy wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Jimmy wrote:the joker wrote:thats one reason the roosters are in such a good state of the field. unlike sturt
LMFAO!!!!!!!:D:D
what's with the laughter Jim-bob?
Financially we would be streets ahead of Strut...
I didnt say you werent, but his comment seemed to imply that 'Sturt' are not in a good state off the field when in fact its the complete opposite. I'm sure he is only joking as his posts are generally insightful and factful, but this one, if not a joke, was shocking.
by hawks21 » Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:24 pm
the joker wrote:Lets be serious he didnt leave to try get in the midfield more.
He wanted More Money and roosters wouldnt give him the money they wanted
thats one reason the roosters are in such a good state of the field. unlike sturt
by Punk Rooster » Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:57 pm
Hmmm. We're heading in the right direction financially (servicing debt with a good income stream), however, there are worrying signs off the field in a coupe of positions. Once these are adressed, things should improve on-field.hawks21 wrote:the joker wrote:Lets be serious he didnt leave to try get in the midfield more.
He wanted More Money and roosters wouldnt give him the money they wanted
thats one reason the roosters are in such a good state of the field. unlike sturt
You may be in a good state off the field but maybe its time to look what state your in on the field..
Doubt he would be on big money playing 2's and with sturt's financial situation. Maybe he just wanted out like a lot of other North players have over the years..
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |