Speculation anybody?

by Mr66 » Tue May 27, 2008 10:36 pm
by Sponge Bob » Tue May 27, 2008 10:39 pm
Mr66 wrote:This is being alluded to, in another thread.
Speculation anybody?
by Mr66 » Tue May 27, 2008 10:40 pm
Captain Cordial wrote:Mr66 wrote:This is being alluded to, in another thread.
Speculation anybody?
I wouldn't think there was anything to speculate on, would you??
by bayman » Tue May 27, 2008 10:53 pm
by Mr66 » Tue May 27, 2008 10:55 pm
Captain Cordial wrote:
I wouldn't think there was anything to speculate on, would you??
by Sponge Bob » Tue May 27, 2008 10:57 pm
bayman wrote:ok, i'll ask it could michael taylor return to norwood now that jack has left noarlunga ?
by bayman » Tue May 27, 2008 10:59 pm
Captain Cordial wrote:bayman wrote:ok, i'll ask it could michael taylor return to norwood now that jack has left noarlunga ?
He's a bit like Jack, Too old, Too slow. That would be a backward step that Norwood would take a long time to recover from if it ever happened. Coaching is a younger guys world nowadays, the dinosaurs are long gone.![]()
by Sponge Bob » Tue May 27, 2008 11:01 pm
Mr66 wrote:Captain Cordial wrote:
I wouldn't think there was anything to speculate on, would you??
1.3.9 is a pretty good reason.
by Mr66 » Tue May 27, 2008 11:20 pm
Captain Cordial wrote:You didn't last work in Pentridge did you in about 1968????
by Interceptor » Wed May 28, 2008 12:02 am
Captain Cordial wrote:Mr66 wrote:Captain Cordial wrote:
I wouldn't think there was anything to speculate on, would you??
1.3.9 is a pretty good reason.
I'd start to be concerned if that trend continued but don't scalp a guy after 1 bad loss. You didn't last work in Pentridge did you in about 1968????
by Brucetiki » Wed May 28, 2008 1:09 am
by Adelaide Hawk » Wed May 28, 2008 7:24 am
Brucetiki wrote:Trevor Who (I mean Hill)
by gadj1976 » Wed May 28, 2008 8:46 am
Mr66 wrote:Captain Cordial wrote:
I wouldn't think there was anything to speculate on, would you??
1.3.9 is a pretty good reason.
by RyderCourtney » Wed May 28, 2008 10:49 am
Interceptor wrote:Captain Cordial wrote:Mr66 wrote:Captain Cordial wrote:
I wouldn't think there was anything to speculate on, would you??
1.3.9 is a pretty good reason.
I'd start to be concerned if that trend continued but don't scalp a guy after 1 bad loss. You didn't last work in Pentridge did you in about 1968????
There's been several bad losses and one inept draw this year.
Plus 7 goalless quarters already this season.
Only wins have been against a struggling West, the traditional foes Port and an inspired performance against North.
Hill is simply unable to extract good peformances out of the players on a consistent basis and that is what a good coach does.
He seemed like a reasonable signing when he started, but as far as I'm concerned he has to go.
by Sponge Bob » Wed May 28, 2008 1:19 pm
Interceptor wrote:Captain Cordial wrote:Mr66 wrote:Captain Cordial wrote:
I wouldn't think there was anything to speculate on, would you??
1.3.9 is a pretty good reason.
I'd start to be concerned if that trend continued but don't scalp a guy after 1 bad loss. You didn't last work in Pentridge did you in about 1968????
There's been several bad losses and one inept draw this year.
Plus 7 goalless quarters already this season.
Only wins have been against a struggling West, the traditional foes Port and an inspired performance against North.
Hill is simply unable to extract good peformances out of the players on a consistent basis and that is what a good coach does.
He seemed like a reasonable signing when he started, but as far as I'm concerned he has to go.
by Interceptor » Wed May 28, 2008 1:51 pm
Captain Cordial wrote:Interceptor wrote:There's been several bad losses and one inept draw this year.
Plus 7 goalless quarters already this season.
Only wins have been against a struggling West, the traditional foes Port and an inspired performance against North.
Hill is simply unable to extract good peformances out of the players on a consistent basis and that is what a good coach does.
He seemed like a reasonable signing when he started, but as far as I'm concerned he has to go.
So where did the 'inspired performance" come from, the coach, players or the front bar. Someone should get the credit so who might that be? Norwood are like Essendon, underachievers and always looking to blame someone for what is a club and not an individual issue.
by Sojourner » Wed May 28, 2008 2:14 pm
bayman wrote:ok, i'll ask it could michael taylor return to norwood now that jack has left noarlunga ?
by SDK » Wed May 28, 2008 2:26 pm
by G » Wed May 28, 2008 2:36 pm
by Sponge Bob » Wed May 28, 2008 3:36 pm
Interceptor wrote:Captain Cordial wrote:Interceptor wrote:There's been several bad losses and one inept draw this year.
Plus 7 goalless quarters already this season.
Only wins have been against a struggling West, the traditional foes Port and an inspired performance against North.
Hill is simply unable to extract good peformances out of the players on a consistent basis and that is what a good coach does.
He seemed like a reasonable signing when he started, but as far as I'm concerned he has to go.
So where did the 'inspired performance" come from, the coach, players or the front bar. Someone should get the credit so who might that be? Norwood are like Essendon, underachievers and always looking to blame someone for what is a club and not an individual issue.
It seems you haven't been paying much attention to the SANFL lately so let me explain.
Lee Blake, whilst not a household name was known to many here as a recent Norwood player who had recently suffered a relapse of cancer. He entered hospital shortly before the Port game and died shortly after that game. His funeral was held in the week prior to the North game.
That is where the emotion/inspiration came from.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |